A learning disability is commonly defined as a discrepancy between IQ and achievement. This has been criticized for identifying too many children as having a learning disability who have high IQs and average academic achievement. Such overidentification as actually occurred was assessed in 473 referred children (8–16 years, M= 10, SD = 2) with normal intelligence. Learning disability was defined as a significant discrepancy (p<.05) between predicted and obtained achievement in reading, mathematics, or written expression on the Wechsler Individual Achievement Test. Predicted achievement was based on the child's WISC-III Full Scale IQ. Overidentification was considered to occur when a child scored at or above age level in reading, mathematics, and writing but still had a significant discrepancy between predicted and obtained achievement by virtue of a high IQ. Learning disability was diagnosed in 312 (66%) of the children. There was no overidentification because all children had one or more WIAT scores below the normative level for their age, i.e., < 100. Further, only 7% of the children were identified with a learning disability based on a WIAT score in the 90s. These children had a mean IQ of 123 and were rated by their teachers and parents as having learning problems.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AaronP. G. (1997) The impending demise of the discrepancy formula. Review of Educational Research, 67, 461–502.
2.
AlgozzineB.YsseldykeJ. E.McGueM. (1995) Differentiating low-achieving students: Thoughts on setting the record straight. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 10, 140–144.
3.
American Psychiatric Association. (1994) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. (4th ed.) Washington, DC: Author.
4.
AndersonJ. A.KutashK.DuchnowskiA. J. (2001) A comparison of the academic progress of students with EBD and students with LD. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 9, 106–115.
5.
BarkleyR. A., (1990) Associated problems, subtyping, and etiology. In BarkleyR. A. (Ed.), Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: A handbook for diagnosis and treatment. New York: Guilford. Pp. 74–105.
6.
BeitchmanJ. H.CantwellD. P.FornessS. R.KavaleK. A.KauffmanJ. M. (1998) Practice parameters for the assessment and treatment of children and adolescents with language and learning disorders. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 37, 46S–62S.
7.
CaseyJ. E.RourkeB. P.Del DottoJ. E. (1996) Learning disabilities in children with attention deficit disorder with and without hyperactivity. Child Neuropsychology, 2, 83–98.
8.
DanoffB.HarrisK. R.GrahamS. (1993) Incorporating strategy instruction within the writing process in the regular classroom: Effects on the writing of students with and without learning disabilities. Journal of Reading Behavior, 25, 295–322.
9.
Federal Register. (March 12, 1999) Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). Washington, DC: Author.
10.
FeltonR. H.WoodF. B. (1992) A reading level match study of nonword reading skills in poor readers with varying IQ. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25, 318–326.
11.
FletcherJ. M.FrancisD. J.RourkeB. P.ShaywitzS. E.ShaywitzB. A. (1992) The validity of discrepancy-based definitions of reading disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25, 555–561.
12.
FletcherJ. M.FrancisD. J.ShaywitzS. E.LyonG. R.FoormanB. R.SteubingK. K.ShaywitzB. A. (1998) Intelligent testing and the discrepancy model for children with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 13, 186–203.
13.
FletcherJ. M.ShaywitzS. E.ShankweilerD. P.KatzL.LibermanI. Y.StuebingK. K.FrancisD. J.FowlerA. E.ShaywitzB. A. (1994) Cognitive profiles of reading disability: Comparisons of discrepancy and low achievement definitions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 6–23.
14.
GonzalezJ. E. J.EspinelA. I. G. (1999) Is IQ-achievement discrepancy relevant in the definition of arithmetic learning disabilities?Learning Disability Quarterly, 22, 291–301.
15.
GordonM.LewandowskiL.KreiserS. (1999) The LD label for relatively well-functioning students: A critical analysis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32, 485–490.
16.
GrahamS. (1990) The role of production factors in learning disabled students' compositions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 781–791.
17.
GreenblattE.MattisS.TradP. V. (1991) The ACID pattern and the Freedom From Distractibility factor in a child psychiatric population. Developmental Neuropsychology, 7, 121–130.
18.
GreshamF. M.MacMillanD. L.BocianK. M. (1996) Learning disabilities, low achievement, and mild mental retardation: More alike than different?Journal of Learning Disabilities, 29, 570–581.
19.
HallS. J.HalperinJ. M.SchwartzS. T.NewcornJ. H. (1997) Behavioral and executive functions in children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and reading disability. Journal of Attention Disorders, 1, 235–247.
20.
HoskynM.SwansonH. L. (2000) Cognitive processing of low achievers and children with reading disabilities: A selective meta-analytic review of the published literature. School Psychology Review, 29, 102–119.
21.
HurfordD. P.JohnstonM.NepoteP.HamptonS.MooreS.NealJ.MuellerA.McGeorgeK.HuffL.AwadA.TatroC.JulianoC.HuffmanD. (1994) Early identification and remediation of phonological-processing deficits in first-grade children at risk for reading disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27, 647–659.
22.
JimenezJ. E.OrtizM.RodrigoM.Hernandez-ValleI.RamirezG.EstevezI.O'Shan-AhanI.TrabaueLuz M. (2003) Do the effects of computer-assisted practice differ for children with reading disabilities with and without IQ-achievement discrepancy?Journal of Learning Disabilities, 36, 34–47.
23.
KavaleK. A. (1995) Setting the record straight on learning disability and low achievement: The tortuous path of ideology. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 10, 145–152.
24.
KershnerJ. R. (1990) Self-concept and IQ as predictors of remedial success in children with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23, 368–374.
25.
KorkmanM.PesonenA-E. (1994) A comparison of neuropsychological test profiles of children with attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder and/or learning disorder. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27, 383–392.
26.
LaneS. E.LewandowskiL. (1994) Oral and written composition of students with and without learning disabilities. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 12, 142–153.
27.
LindgrenS. D.KoepplG. K. (1987) Assessing child behavior problems in a medical setting: Development of the Pediatric Behavior Scale. In PrinzR. J. (Ed.), Advances in behavioral assessment of children and families. Greenwich, CT: JAI. Pp. 57–90.
28.
MacArthurC. A. (1996) Using technology to enhance the writing processes of students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 29, 344–354.
29.
MacArthurC. A. (2000) New tools for writing: Assistive technology for students with writing difficulties. Topics in Language Disorders, 20, 85–100.
30.
MayesS. D.CalhounS. L. (2003a) Ability profiles in children with autism. Autism, 6, 65–80.
31.
MayesS. D.CalhounS. L. (2003b) Analysis of WISC-III, Stanford-Binet: IV, and academic achievement test scores in children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 33, 329–341.
32.
MayesS. D.CalhounS. L.CrowellE. W. (1998) WISC-III profiles for children with and without learning disabilities. Psychology in the Schools, 35, 309–316.
33.
MayesS. D.CalhounS. L.CrowellE. W. (2000) Learning disabilities and ADHD: Overlapping spectrum disorders. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 417–424.
34.
McNaughtonD.HughesC.OfieshN. (1997) Proofreading for students with learning disabilities: Integrating computer and strategy use. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 12, 16–28.
35.
MinshewN. J.GoldsteinG.TaylorH. G.SiegelD. J. (1994) Academic achievement in high functioning autistic individuals. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 16, 261–270.
36.
The Psychological Corporation. (1992) Wechsler Individual Achievement Test manual. New York: Psychological Corp.
37.
SattlerJ. M. (2002) Assessment of children: Behavioral and clinical implications. (4th ed.) San Diego, CA: Jerome M. Sattler.
38.
SawyerR. J.GrahamS.HarrisK. R. (1992) Direct teaching, strategy instruction, and strategy instruction with explicit self-regulation: Effects on the composition skills and self-efficacy of students with learning disabilities. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 340–352.
39.
SchuerholzL. J.HarrisE. L.BaumgardnerT. L.ReissA. L.FreundL. S.ChurchR. P.MohrJ.DencklaM. B. (1995) An analysis of two discrepancy-based models and a processing-deficit approach in identifying learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 28, 18–29.
40.
Semrud-ClikemanM.BiedermanJ.Sprich-BuckminsterS.LehmanB. K.FaraoneS. V.NormanD. (1992) Comorbidity between ADHD and learning disability: A review and report in a clinically referred sample. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 31, 439–448.
41.
ShaywitzB. A.FletcherJ. M.HolahanJ. M.ShaywitzS. E. (1992) Discrepancy compared to low achievement definitions of reading disability: Results from the Connecticut Longitudinal Study. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25, 639–648.
42.
ShaywitzS. E.ShaywitzB. A. (1993) Learning disabilities and attention deficits in the school setting. In MeltzerL. G. (Ed.), Strategy assessment and instruction for students with learning disabilities: From theory to practice. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed. Pp. 221–245.
43.
ShinnM. R.YsseldykeJ. E.DenoS. L.TindalG. A. (1986) A comparison of differences between students labeled learning disabled and low achieving on measures of classroom performance. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 19, 545–552.
44.
StanovichK. E.SiegelL. S. (1994) Phenotypic performance profile of children with reading disabilities: A regression-based test of the phonological-core variable-difference model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 24–53.
45.
VaughnS.GerstenR.ChardD. J. (2000) The underlying message in LD intervention research: Findings from research syntheses. Exceptional Children, 67, 99–114.
46.
VellutinoF. R.ScanlonD. M.LyonG. R. (2000) Differentiating between difficult-to-remediate and readily remediated poor readers. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 223–238.
47.
VellutinoF. R.ScanlonD. M.SipayE. R.SmallS. G. (1996) Cognitive profiles of difficult-to-remediate and readily remediated poor readers: Early intervention as a vehicle for distinguishing between cognitive and experiential deficits as basic causes of specific reading disability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 601–638.
48.
WechslerD. (1991) Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children. (3rd ed.) New York: Psychological Corp.
49.
WeissL. G.PrifiteraA. (1995) An evaluation of differential prediction of WIAT achievement scores from WISC-III FSIQ across ethnic and gender groups. Journal of School Psychology, 33, 297–304.
50.
WiseB. W.RingJ.OlsonR. K. (1999) Training phonological awareness with and without explicit attention to articulation. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 72, 271–304.
51.
YsseldykeJ. E.AlgozzineB.ShinnM. R.McGueM. (1982) Similarities and differences between low achievers and students classified learning disabled. Journal of Special Education, 16, 73–85.
