The Geometric Young Formula for Elementary Aggregate Producer Price Indexes

Abstract

We re-estimate historical U.S. Producer Price Indexes (PPI) using the geometric Young formula at the elementary level. The geometric Young has better axiomatic properties than the modified Laspeyres, and may better approximate a feasible economic target. We find in most cases, indexes that use the geometric Young escalate between 0.1 and 0.3 percentage points less each year than those that use the modified Laspeyres. However, for wholesale and retail trade, as well as some other services, the differences are much larger. As a result, using the geometric Young at the elementary level lowers the U.S. PPI for Final Demand by 0.55 percentage points per year during the study period, a magnitude larger than what has been previously found for the U.S. Consumer Price Index.

Keywords

Inflation Aggregation geometric Young index Jevons index

References

Archibald, R.B. 1977. “On the Theory of Industrial Price Measurement: Output Price Indexes.” In Annals of Economic and Social Measurement Vol. 6, edited by S.V. Berg. (pp. 57–72). Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research. Available at: http://www.nber.org/chapters/c10502 (accessed October 2018).

Boskin, M.J., E.R. Dulberger, R.J. Gordon, Z. Griliches, D. Jorgenson. 1996. “Toward a more accurate measure of the cost of living: Final Report to the U.S. Senate Finance Committee.” In U.S. Senate Finance Committee. Senate Print 104–72, December, 104th Congress, 2nd Session. Washington, DC: GPO.

Carruthers, A.G., D.J. Sellwood, and P.W. Ward. 1980. “Recent Developments in the Retail Prices Index.” The Statistician 29(1): 1–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2987492.

Caves, D.W., L.R. Christensen, and W.E. Diewert. 1982. “The Economic Theory of Index Numbers and the Measurement of Input, Output, and Productivity.” Econometrica 50(6): 1393–1414. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1913388.

Dalén, J. 1992. “Computing Elementary Aggregates in the Swedish Consumer Price Index.” Journal of Official Statistics 8(2): 129–147. Available at: https://www.scb.se/-contentassets/ca21efb41fee47d293bbee5bf7be7fb3/computing-elementary-aggregates-in-the-swedish-consumer-price-index.pdf (accessed January 2022).

Diewert, W.E. 1983. “The Theory of the Output Price Index and the Measurement of Real Output Change.” In Price Level Measurement, edited by W.E. Diewert and C. Montmarquette Diewert. 1049–1113. Ottawa: Statistics Canada.

Fisher, F.M., and K. Shell. 1972. “The Pure Theory of the National Output Deflator.” In The Economic Theory of Price Indexes, edited by F.M. Fisher and K. Shell. 49–113. New York: Academic Press.

International Monetary Fund. 2004. In Producer Price Index Manual: Theory and Practice, edited by P. Armknecht. Washington, DC: IMF/ILO/OECD/Eurostat/UNECE/World Bank. Available at: https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/ppi/2010/manual/ppi.pdf (accessed March 2019).

Martin, R.S. 2020. Revisiting Taste Change in Cost-of-Living Measurement. Working Paper 515, Washington, DC: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Available at: https://www.bls.gov/osmr/research-papers/2019/ec190050.htm (accessed May 2020)

10.

McClelland, R. 1996. Evaluating Formula Bias in Various Indexes Using Simulations. Working Paper 289, Washington, DC: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Available at: https://www.bls.gov/osmr/research-papers/1996/ec960140.htm (accessed May 2020).

11.

OECD, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. 2011. Producer Price Indices – Comparative Methodological Analysis. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Available at: http://www.oecd.org/sdd/prices-ppp/48370389.pdf (accessed January 2018).

12.

Reinsdorf, M.B. 1998. “Formula Bias and Within-Stratum Substitution Bias in the U.S. CPI.” The Review of Economics and Statistics (MIT Press) 80(2): 175–187. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/003465398557375.

13.

Reinsdorf, M.B., and B.R. Moulton. 1996. “The Construction of Basic Components of Cost-of-Living Indexes.” In The Economics of New Goods, 397–436. University of Chicago Press. Available at: http://www.nber.org/chapters/c6073 (accessed May 2020).

14.

U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 2015. “Chapter 14: Producer Prices.” In Handbook of Methods. Washington D.C.: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Available at: https://www.bls.gov/opub/hom/pdf/ppi-20111028.pdf (accessed March 2019).

15.

U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 2019. “Chapter 17: The Consumer Price Index.” In Handbook of Methods. Washington, DC: Bureau of Labor Statistics. Accessed August 14, 2019. https://www.bls.gov/opub/hom/pdf/cpihom.pdf (accessed August 2019)..

16.

Waehrer, K. 2000. A Comparison of the Substitution Effects for Input and Output Price Indexes. Working Paper 327, Washington, DC: Bureau of Labor Statistics. Available at: https://www.bls.gov/osmr/research-papers/2000/ec000020.htm (accessed July 2019).

17.

Weinhagen, J. 2020. “Measuring the substitution effect in Producer Price Index goods data: 2002–2016.” Monthly Labor Review. Available at: https://www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/2020/article/measuring-the-substitution-effect-in-ppi-data.htm (accessed July 2020).