Changes in Norwegian public opinion on alcohol policy,2005-2012

Abstract

Aims

During the last two decades there has been a substantial liberalisation of Norwegian alcohol policy in terms of increased availability of alcohol. We have studied what happens with public support for alcohol control policies in a country where the policy is liberalised. First, we summarise the findings from previous Norwegian studies on changes in attitudes toward alcohol control policies. Second, we present new empirical analyses on changes in attitudes toward a broad spectre of policies in 2005–2012, and whether the pattern of change varied according to gender, age, education and alcohol use.

Design

The empirical analyses were based on self-reported attitudes toward Norwegian alcohol policies from nine web surveys conducted among 20–69-year-old Norwegians (N = 12 304).

Results

The analyses showed increased support for a wide range of restrictive alcohol policy measures from 2005 to 2012 – both for measures that had been liberalised and those that had been stable. We found no substantial moderation by gender, age, educational level and drinking frequency, which indicates that the pattern of change was similar for various sub-groups based on such variables.

Conclusions

Previous research has observed a shift toward increasing support for a restrictive alcohol policy around the millennium. Current data shows that this trend has continued until 2012. We discuss the relationship between alcohol policy and public opinion, and propose that the trend may be connected to changes in value orientations, increased experience with alcohol-related harm and changes in beliefs about the harm-limiting effect of restrictive measures.

Keywords

alcohol policy public opinion attitudes support

References

Brand

D. A.

, Saisana

, Rynn

L. A.

, Pennoni

, & Lowenfels

A. B.

(2007). Comparative analysis of alcohol control policies in 30 countries. PLos Medicine, 4, 752–759.

Dalen

, & Lilleb⊘

(2005). Telefonunders⊘kelse om Vinmonopolets omd⊘mme april 2005 [Telephone interview about the reputation of Vinmonopolet, April 2005]. Oslo, Norway: MMI.

Edland-Gryt

(2012). Alcohol and drugs in Norway. Oslo, Norway: Norwegian Institute for Alcohol and Drug Research (SIRUS).

Giesbrecht

, & Greenfield

T. K.

(1999). Public opinion on alcohol policy issues: A comparison of American and Canadian surveys. Addiction, 94, 521–531.

Giesbrecht

, Ialomiteanu

, Anglin

, & Adlaf

(2007). Alcohol marketing and retailing: Public opinion and recent policy development in Canada. Journal of Substance Use, 12, 389–404.

Giesbrecht

, Ialomiteanu

, Room

, & Anglin

(2001). Trends in public opinion on alcohol policy measures: Ontario 1989–1998. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 62, 142–149.

Greenfield

T. K.

, Johnson

S. P.

, & Giesbrecht

(2004). Public opinion on alcohol policy: A review of U.S. research. Contemporary Drug Problems, 31, 759–790.

Greenfield

T. K.

, Yu

, & Giesbrecht

(2007a). Alcohol policy opinions in the United States over a 15-year period of dynamic per capita consumption changes: Implications for today's public health practice. Contemporary Drug Problems, 34, 649–680.

Greenfield

T. K.

, Yu

, & Giesbrecht

(2007b). Views of alcohol control policies in the 2000 National Alcohol Survey: What news for alcohol policy development in the US and its states. Journal of Substance Use, 12, 429–445.

10.

Hellevik

(2008). Jakten på den norske lykke [Striving for Norwegian happiness]. Oslo, Norway: Universitetsforlaget.

11.

Hellevik

(2012). Utviklingen i nordmenns verdisyn: Resultater fra Norsk Monitor [Developments in Norwegian values: Results from Norsk Monitor]. Presentation at the Ministry of Education and Research. Retrieved June 5, 2013, from http://www.regjeringen.no/upload/KD/Kampanjer/Kunnskapsbanken/Dokumenter/Hellevik_Norske_verdier.pdf.

12.

Hestmann

M. L.

(2012). Vinmonopolets ⊘md⊘mmemåling 2012 [A study of the reputation of Vinmonopolet, 2012]. Oslo, Norway: TNS Gallup.

13.

Holmberg

, & Weibull

(2011). Alkoholvanor och alkoholopinion [Drinking habits and opinion on alcohol]. In Holmberg

, Weibull

, & Oscarsson

(Eds.), Lycksalighetens ö [Blissful island] (pp. 377–392). Göteborg, Sweden: SOM-institutet, Göteborgs Universitet.

14.

Holmberg

, & Weibull

(2013). Förändringar i alkoholopinionen [Changes in opinion on alcohol]. In Weibull

, Oscarsson

, & Bergström

(Eds.), Vägskäl [Crossroads] (pp. 203–222). Göteborg, Sweden: SOM-institutet, Göteborgs Universitet.

15.

Holmila

, Mustonen

, Österberg

, & Raitasalo

(2009). Public opinion and community-based prevention of alcohol-related harms. Addiction Reseach and Theory, 17, 360–371.

16.

Horverak,

Ø.

(2008). The transition from over-the-counter to self-service sales of alcoholic beverages in Norwegian monopoly outlets: Implications for sales and customer satisfaction. Nordic Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 25, 77–99.

17.

Hübner

(2012). Swedish public opinion on alcohol and alcohol policy, 1995 and 2003. Journal of Substance Use, 17, 218–229.

18.

Ialomiteanu

, Giesbrecht

, Adlaf

, Irving

, Paglia-Boak

, & Rehm

(2010). An exploratory approach to analyzing alcohol control policy opinions held by Ontario adults. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 7, 827–841.

19.

Ipsos-MMI. (2013). Unders⊘kelse om nordmenns holdninge til skatter og avgifter [A study of Norwegian attitudes towards taxes]. Oslo, Norway: Ipsos MMI.

20.

Karlsson

, & Österberg

(2001). A scale of formal alcohol control policy in 15 European countries. Nordic Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 18, 117–121.

21.

Lavik

, & Nordlund

(2009). Norway at the border of EU: cross-border shopping and its implications. Nordic Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 26, 205–231.

22.

Macdonald

, Stockwell

, & Luo

J. S.

(2011). The relationship between alcohol problems, perceived risks and attitudes toward alcohol policy in Canada. Drug and Alcohol Review, 30, 652–658.

23.

Maclennan

, Kypri

, Langley

, & Room

(2012). Non-response bias in a community survey of drinking, alcohol-related experiences and public opinion on alcohol policy. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 126, 189–194.

24.

Nordlund

(2007). The influence of EU on alcohol policy in a non-EU country. Journal of Substance Use, 12, 405–418.

25.

Nordlund

(2010). Effects of increasing availability of wine and spirits in Norway. Nordic Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 27, 127–140.

26.

Rossow

(2010). Challenges in an affluent society. Trends in alcohol consumption, harms and policy: Norway 1990–2010. Nordic Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 27, 449–463.

27.

Saglie

, & Nordlund

(1993). Alkoholpolitikken og opinionen [Alcohol policy and the opinions]. SIFA-report 3/1993. Oslo, Norway: Norwegian Institute for Alcohol and Drug Research (SIFA).

28.

Skjælaaen,

Ø.

(2009). Kommunenes forvaltning av alkoholloven 2009 [Municipal administration of the Alcohol Act in 2009]. Oslo, Norway: Norwegian Institute for Alcohol and Drug Research (SIRUS).

29.

Skjælaaen,

Ø.

(2011). Alkoholpolitikk [Alcohol policy]. In Skretting

, & Storvoll

E. E.

(Eds.), Utviklingstrekk på rusmidelfeltet. Grunnlagsmateriale til regjeringens stortingsmelding om rusmiddelpolitikken [Developments in the field of alcohol and drugs: Background information for the government's report on alcohol and drugs policy to the parliament]. SIRUS-report 3/2011 (pp. 68–81). Oslo, Norway: Norwegian Institute for Alcohol and Drug Research (SIRUS).

30.

Storvoll

E. E.

, & Rossow

(2011). Alkoholrelaterte skader og problemer [Alcohol-related harms and problems]. In Skretting

, & Storvoll

E. E.

(Eds.), Utviklingstrekk på rusmiddelfeltet. Grunnlagsmateriale til regjeringens stortingsmelding om rusmiddelpolitikken [Developments in the field of alcohol and drugs: Background information for the government's report on alcohol and drugs policy to the parliament]. SIRUS-report 3/2011 (pp. 96–105). Oslo, Norway: Norwegian Institute for Alcohol and Drug Research (SIRUS).

31.

Storvoll

E. E.

, Rossow

, & Rise

(2010). Alkoholpolitikken og opinionen. Endringer i befolkningens holdninger til alkoholpolitikken og oppfatninger om effekten av ulike virkemidler i perioden 2005-2009 [Alcohol policy and public opinion: Changes in attitudes to alcohol policy and perception of the effect of different measures during the period 2005–2009]. SIRUS-report 1/2010. Oslo, Norway: Norwegian Institute for Alcohol and Drug Research (SIRUS).

32.

Storvoll

E. E.

, Rossow

, & Rise

(2013). Changes in attitudes towards restrictive alcohol policy measures: The mediating role of changes in beliefs. Journal of Substance Use, early online, 1–6.

33.

van der Sar

, Storvoll

E. E.

, Brouwers

E. P. M.

, van de Goor

I. A. M.

, Rise

, & Garretsen

H. F. L.

(2012). Dutch and Norwegian support of alcohol policy measures to prevent young people from problematic drinking: A cross-national comparison. Alcohol and Alcoholism, 47, 479–485.

34.

Wilkinson

, Room

, & Livingston

(2009). Mapping Australian public opinion on alcohol policies in the new millennium. Drug and Alcohol Review, 28, 263–274.

35.

Österberg

(2007). Finnish attitudes to alcohol policy in 2005. Journal of Substance Use, 12, 419–427.

36.

Østhus

(2005). Befolkningens holdninger til alkoholpolitikken – en analyse av sammenhengen mellom alkoholpolitikken og folkemeningen i perioden fra 1962 og fram til i dag. [Population attitudes towards alcohol policy: An analysis of the association between alcohol policy and opinion in the period from 1962 to today]. SIRUS-report 3/2005. Oslo, Norway: Norwegian Institute for Alcohol and Drug Research (SIRUS). Østhus, S., Bye, E. K., & Storvoll, E. E. (2011). Alkoholkonsum [Alcohol consumption]. In Skretting

, & Storvoll

E. E.

(Eds.), Utviklingstrekk på rusmiddelfeltet. Grunnlagsmateriale til regjeringens stortingsmelding om rusmiddelpolitikken. [Developments in the field of alcohol and drugs: Background information for the government's report on alcohol and drugs policy to the parliament]. SIRUS-report 3/2011 (pp. 82–95). Oslo, Norway: Norwegian Institute for Alcohol and Drug Research (SIRUS).