Two techniques for butterfly DNA storage were compared using Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) amplification of a fragment from the ND4 gene. Extracted DNA was put into microcentrifuge tubes and stored at -20°C; alternatively, they were put on filter paper and stored at ambient temperatures. Fragments of DNA amplified through PCR that came from filter paper exhibited high quality. Our results suggest storage on filter paper to be a simple, effective and inexpensive alternative to preserve extracted DNA.
AVISEJ.2004. Molecular markers, natural history, and evolution. Sinauer associates, Inc. Miami. United States of America. 684 р.
2.
CAMPBELLD.; PIERCEN.2003. Phylogenetic relationships of the Riodinidae: implications for the evolution of ant association, pp. 395–408. En: BoggsC.; WattW.; EhrlichP. (eds.). Butterflies. Ecology and evolution taking flight. The University of Chicago Press. Chicago. United States of America. 739 p.
3.
DESSAUERH.; COLEC.; HAFNERM.1996. Collection and storage of tissues, pp. 29–47. En: HillisD.; MoritzC.; MableB. (eds.). Molecular systematics. Sinauer associates. Miami. United States of America. 656 р.
4.
DEVOSTN.; CHOYF.2000. Mutation analysis of Gaucher disease using dot-blood samples on FTA filter paper. American Journal of Medical Genetics94: 417–420.
5.
HOYM.1994. Insect molecular genetics. Academic press, Inc. California. United States of America 546 p.
6.
KEYGHOBADIN.; ROLANDJ.; FOWNESS.; STROBECKC.2003. Ink marks and molecular markers: examining the effects of landscape on dispersal using both mark-recapture and molecular methods, pp. 169–183. En: BoggsC.; WattW.; EhrlichP. (eds.). Butterflies. Ecology and evolution taking flight. The University of Chicago Press. Chicago. United States of America. 739 р.
7.
MALLARINOR.; BERMINGHAME.; WILLMOTTK.; WHINNETTA.; JIGGINSC.2005. Molecular systematics of the butterfly genus Ithomia (Lepidoptera: Ithomiinae): a composite phylogenetic hypothesis based on seven genes. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution34 (3): 625–44.
8.
NATARAJANP.; TRINHT.; MERTZL.; GOLDSBOROUGHM.; FOXD.2000. Paper-based archiving of mammalian and plant samples for RNA analysis. Biotechniques29: 1328–1333.
9.
QUICKED. L.1993. Principles and techniques of contemporary taxonomy. Blackie academic & professional. Great Britain. 311 p.
10.
SNOWDENK. F.; LOGANK.; VINSONS.2002. Simple, filter-based PCR detection of Thelohania solenopsae (Microspora) in fire ants (Solenopsis invicta). Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology49: 447–448.
11.
SPERLINGF.2003. Butterfly molecular systematics: from species definitions to higher -level phylogenies, pp. 431–458. En: BoggsC.; WattW.; EhrlichP. (eds.). Butterflies. Ecology and evolution taking flight. The University of Chicago Press. Chicago. United States of America. 739 p.
12.
SPERLINGF.; HARRISONR.1994. Mitochondrial DNA variation within and between species of the Papilio machaon group of swallowtail butterflies. Evolution48: 409–422.
13.
URIBES.; LEHMANNT.; ROWTONE.; VÉLEZI.; PORTERC. H.2001. Speciation and population structure in the morphospecies Lutzomyia longipalpis (Lutz & Neiva) as derived from the mitochondrial ND4 gene. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution18 (1): 84–93.
14.
WAHLBERGN.2006Lepidoptera Evolution, Taxonomy and Systematics- Scientific Report European Science Foundation. Stockholm, Sweden, 12 p.
15.
WHINNETTA.; BROWERA.; LEEM.; WILLMOTTK.; MALLETJ.2005. The phylogenetic utility of Tektin, a novel region for inferring systematic relationships amongst Lepidoptera. Annals of the Entomological Society of America98 (6): 873–886.
16.
YANGH.; GOLENBERGE.; SHOSHANIJ.1997. Probosidean DNA from museum and fossil specimens: An assessment of ancient DNA extraction and amplification techniques. Biochemical Genetics35 (5/6): 165–179.
