This article presents a qualitative, interpretivist research study that documents the emergence, in the context of typed expression, of increasingly useful and reliable speech for a young person labeled with autism. The authors construct a descriptive narrative of the process of this young man's emergent speech development and organize the data around four components of this complex, dynamic, and nonlinear process: (a) echolalia or “unreliable” speech, (b) reading out loud, (c) using reliable speech, and (d) integrating speaking and typing. Additionally, the authors identify three categories of supports that this young man and his family experienced and interpreted as being supportive of his emergent speech. These categories include (a) the importance of taking risks, (b) the importance of seeing and hearing words together, and (c) the importance of an inclusive academic education including rich literacy experiences. Throughout, this inductive analysis constructs an understanding of how this young man and his family have experienced and interpreted his emergence as a reliable speaker.
AttfieldR. (1998). My half of the tide. Facilitated Communication Digest, 6(2).
2.
BeukelmanD.MirendaP. (1998). Augmentative and alternative communication: Management of severe communication disorders in children and adults (2nd ed.). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
3.
BiklenD. (1990). Communication unbound: Autism and praxis. Harvard Educational Review, 60, 291–314.
4.
BiklenD. (1993). Communication unbound: How facilitated communication is challenging traditional views of autism and ability/disability. New York: Teachers College Press.
5.
BiklenD. (1999). The metaphor of mental retardation: Rethinking ability and disability. In BersaniH.Jr. (Ed.), Responding to the challenge: Current trends and international issues in developmental disabilities: Essays in honor of Gunnar Dybwad (pp. 35–52). Cambridge: Brookline Books.
6.
BiklenD. (2000). Lessons from the margins, narrating mental retardation: A review essay. Mental Retardation, 38 (5), 444–456.
7.
BiklenD.CardinalD. (Eds.) (1997). Contested words, contested science: Unraveling the facilitated communication controversy. New York: Teachers College Press.
8.
BiklenD.RiceN. E., Producers (1999). Sharisa: My life as a pioneer [Videotape]. Syracuse: Syracuse University, Facilitated Communication Institute.
9.
BiklenD.SahaN.KliewerC. (1995). How teachers confirm authorship of facilitated communication: A portfolio approach. Journal of the Association of Persons with Severe Handicaps, 20 (1), 45–56.
10.
BlackmanL. (1999). Lucy's story: Autism and other adventures. Brisbane: Book in Hand.
11.
BogdanR.BiklenS. (1998). Introduction to qualitative research in education (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
12.
BogdanR.TaylorS. J. (1989). Relationships with severely disabled people: The social construction of humanness. Social Problems, 36, 135–148.
13.
BorthwickC.CrossleyR. (October 17, 1999). Language and retardation: Target article on language-retardation. Psycoloquy [On-line serial], 10 (038). Available E-mail: cborthwick@vichealth.uic.gov.au.
14.
BroderickA.Kasa-HendricksonC. (1999). Toward independent typing: The collaborative use of portfolio documentation. The Facilitated Communication Digest, 7 (3), 2–14.
15.
CalculatorS. N.SingerK. M. (1992). Preliminary validation of facilitated communication [Letter to the editor]. Topics in Language Disorders, 12(4), ix–xvi.
16.
CrossleyR. (1994). Facilitated communication training. New York: Teachers College Press.
17.
CrossleyR. (1997). Speechless: Facilitating communication for people without voices. New York: Dutton.
18.
DenzinN.LincolnY. (Eds.) (2000). Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
19.
DonnellanA. M.LearyM. R. (1995). Movement differences and diversity in autism/mental retardation: Appreciating and accommodating people with communication and behavioral challenges. Madison, WI: DRI Press.
20.
FergusonP. M.FergusonD. L.TaylorS. J. (Eds.) (1992). Interpreting disability: A qualitative reader. New York: Teachers College Press.
21.
GoodeD. (1992). Who is Bobby?: Ideology and method in the discovery of a Down Syndrome person's competence. In FergusonP. M.FergusonD. L.TaylorS. J. (Eds.), Interpreting disability: A qualitative reader (pp. 197–212). New York: Teachers College Press.
22.
GoodeD. (1994). A world without words: The social construction of children born deaf and blind. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
23.
GreenG.ShaneH. C. (1994). Science, reason, and facilitated communication. Journal of the Association of Persons with Severe Handicaps, 19, 151–172.
24.
JacobsonJ. W.MulickJ. A.SchwartzA. A. (1995). A history of facilitated communication: Science, pseudoscience, and antiscience. American Psychologist, 50 (9), 750–765.
25.
LearyM. R.HillD. A. (1996). Moving on: Autism and movement disturbance. Mental Retardation, 34 (1), 39–53.
26.
MeyersL. (1998). Giving voice: Assitive technology and FC. The Facilitated Communication Digest, 6 (2), 4–11.
27.
RichardsonL. (2000). Writing: A method of inquiry. In DenzinN.LincolnY. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
28.
RomskiM. A.SevcikR. A.AdamsonL. B. (1999). Communication patterns of youth with mental retardation with and without their speech-output communication devices. American Journal of Mental Retardation, 104 (3), 249–259.
29.
RubinS.BiklenD.Kasa-HendricksonC.KluthP.CardinalD. N.BroderickA. (2001). Independence, participation, and the meaning of intellectual ability. Disability and Society, 16 (3), 413–429.
30.
SmithP. (1999). Drawing new maps: A radical cartography of developmental disabilities. Review of Educational Research, 69 (2), 117–144.
31.
TaylorS. J.BogdanR. (1998). Introduction to qualitative research methods (3rd ed.). New York: Wiley.
32.
ThelenE. (1995). Motor development: A new synthesis. American Psychologist, 50 (2), 79–95.
33.
ThelenE.SmithL. (1994). A dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action. Cambridge: MIT Press.
34.
WheelerD. L.JacobsonJ. W.PaglieriR. A.SchwartzA. A. (1993). An experimental assessment of facilitated communication. Mental Retardation, 31 (1), 49–60.
