For ethnobiology as a field to achieve its full relevance in the scientific and social realms, ethnobiologists need to take stock of the field as a collective. In 2008, the members of the International Society of Ethnobiology (ISE), Society of Ethnobiology (SoE) and the Society of Economic Botany (SEB) were surveyed to determine the demographics of the societies, member interests and priorities, and the future they envision for each society and for the field as a whole. The three societies share relatively few members, suggesting that the societies fulfill substantively different roles for ethnobiologists. The ISE strives to be a meeting ground for all stakeholders internationally and draws more biologists. The SoE was founded with an academic emphasis and draws most members from North America and anthropological traditions. SEB is also an academically-oriented society with a strong focus on botany. We call for synergies and networking among these societies and a broader ethnobiology constituency to leverage the insights and applications of the field to contemporary ecological and social crises.
BannisterK. and SolomonM.. 2009. Appropriation of Traditional Knowledge: Ethics in the Context of Ethnobiology (Part I). InThe Ethics of Cultural Appropriation. eds.YoungJ. O. and BrunkC. G.. pp.140–172. Wiley-Blackwell. Oxford.
BrookR. K. and McLachlanS. M.. 2008. Trends and Prospects for Local Knowledge in Ecological and Conservation Research and Monitoring. Biodiversity Conservation17:3501–3512.
4.
BurtonM., WatsonP., QuinnN., and WebsterC.. 1994. Academic Employment of Women in Anthropology. Anthropology News35(7):11–12.
5.
ClémentD.1998. The Historical Foundations of Ethnobiology. Journal of Ethnobiology18:161–187.
FordR. I.1994. Preface to Second Edition. InThe Nature and Status of Ethnobotany. ed.FordR. I.pp.viii–xxxii. Anthropological Papers No. 67, Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan. Ann Arbor.
8.
FordR. I.2001. Introduction: Ethnobiology at a Crossroads. InEthnobiology at the Millennium: Past Promise and Future Prospects. ed.FordR. I.pp.1–9. Museum of Anthropology Publications, University of Michigan. Ann Arbor.
9.
GagnonC. A. and BerteauxD.. 2009. Integrating Traditional Ecological Knowledge and Ecological Science: A Question of Scale. Ecology and Society14(2):19.
10.
HamiltonA. C., ShengjiP., KessyJ., KhanA. A., Lagos-WitteS., and ShinwariZ. K.. 2003. The Purposes and Teaching of Applied Ethnobotany. People and Plants Working Paper 11. WWF. Godalming, UK.
11.
HunnE. S.2008. A Zapotec Natural History: Trees, Herbs, and Flowers, Birds, Beasts, and Bugs in the Life of San Juan Gbëë. University of Arizona Press. Tucson.
12.
International Society of Ethnobiology2006. International Society of Ethnobiology Code of Ethics (with 2008 additions). Available at: www.ethnobiology.net/ethics.php (verified 8 February 2011).
13.
Kaua'i DeclarationThe. 1997. Ethnobotany, the science of survival: a declaration from Kaua'i. Economic Botany61:1–2.
14.
LairdS. A.ed.2002. Biodiversity and Traditional Knowledge: Equitable Partnerships in Practice. Earthscan Publications Ltd. London.
15.
McClatcheyW., PaulA., FlasterT., and McClatcheyV.. 1999. An Evaluation of Educational Trends in Economic [Botany] and Ethnobotany. Fact Sheet EBOO1, Ethnobotany Educational Publications Series, The Centre for International Ethnomedicinal Education and Research, Honolulu.
16.
McRaeM.1989. Ethnobiologist Forced from Brazil After Harassment by Authorities. The Scientist3(18):14–24.
17.
NabhanG. P.2009. Ethnoecology: Bridging Disciplines, Cultures and Species. Journal of Ethnobiology29:3–7.
PoseyD. A.1998. The ‘Balance-Sheet’ and the ‘Sacred Balance’: Valuing the Knowledge of Indigenous and Traditional People. Worldviews: Environment, Religion, Culture2:91–106.
20.
PoseyD. A. and DutfieldG.. 1996. Beyond Intellectual Property: Toward Traditional Resource Rights for Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities. International Development Research Centre. Ottawa.
21.
RobbinsW. J.1947. Why Another Botanical Magazine?Economic Botany1:3–4.
22.
SalickJ.Ethnobiology Working Group2004. Intellectual Imperatives in Ethnobiology: NSF Biocomplexity Workshop ReportMissouri Botanical Garden. Available at:http://www.econbot.org/pdf/NSF_brochure.pdf (verified 8 February 2011).
23.
SalomonA. K., TanapeN. M.Sr, and HuntingtonH. P.. 2007. Depletion of Marine Invertebrates Leads to the Decline of a Strongly Interacting Grazer. Ecological Applications17(6):1752–1770.
24.
Society for Conservation Biology2010. Available at: www.conbio.org/AboutUs/ (verified 22 January 2010).
25.
Society for Economic Botany2010. Available at: www.econbot.org/_about_/ (verified 5 April 2010).
TippoO.1982. Review of the Journal of Ethnobiology. Economic Botany52:457.
29.
TurnerN.2001. Pieces into Patterns: Botany of British Columbia Cultures and Influences of Society of Ethnobiology Members. InEthnobiology at the Millennium: Past Promise and Future Prospects. ed.FordR. I.pp.163–173. Museum of Anthropology Publications, University of Michigan. Ann Arbor.
30.
WeberS. A.1986. The Development of a Society: An Introduction to the Special Issue. Journal of Ethnobiology6:iii–vi.
31.
WickensG. E.1990. What Is Economic Botany?Economic Botany44:12–28.
32.
WyndhamF. S. and TiffanyS.. 2009. Whither the International Society of Ethnobiology? Some Results from our 2008 Survey of Members. International Society of Ethnobiology News1.1(January):18–20.
