Bring in the Subs: A Mixed-Methods Investigation of the Substitute Teacher Labor Market in Michigan

Abstract

This study focuses on the substitute labor market in Michigan and how substitutes navigate it using a survey of a random sample of the population of substitute teachers and interviews with district administrators, principals, and substitute teachers. Leaders in varied locales and contexts report increasing problems with substitute coverage and teacher absenteeism and leveraged higher pay and community connections to address it. Substitute survey and interview data find that the most important factors in attracting and retaining substitute teachers are pay, flexibility, working conditions, the psychological rewards of teaching, and support or respect. Findings point to a segmented substitute labor market, with highly varied preferences for flexibility and pay, and suggest important parallels and differences compared with teacher labor markets.

Keywords

substitute teachers career development educational policy in-depth interviewing mixed methods qualitative research retention survey research teacher research

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Achinstein

Ogawa

R. T.

Sexton

Freitas

(2010). Retaining teachers of color: A pressing problem and a potential strategy for “hard-to-staff” schools. Review of Educational Research, 80(1), 71–107. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465 4309355994

Addonizio

(2021, April 2). America gets a D+ for school infrastructure—but federal COVID relief could pay for many repairs. The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/america-gets-a-d-for-school-infrastructure-but-federal-covid-relief-could-pay-for-many-repairs-15683

Boyd

Lankford

Loeb

Wyckoff

(2010). The role of teacher quality in retention and hiring: Using applications to transfer to uncover preferences of teachers and schools. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 30(1), 88–110. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.20545

Boyd

Lankford

Loeb

Wyckoff

(2005). The draw of home: How teachers’ preference for proximity disadvantages urban schools. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 24(1), 113–132. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.20072

Boyer

C. E.

(1998). Behaviors and attitudes of teachers toward substitutes: The relationship between effective practices and attitudes of inclusion. ERS Spectrum, 16(2), 43–47.

Burroughs

Gardner

Zuschlag

(2019). There is no substitute: Michigan's substitute teacher shortage (MAPPR Policy Brief). Institute for Public Policy and Social Research. https://ippsr.msu.edu/sites/default/files/MAPPR/MAPPR%20-%20There%20is%20No%20Substitute.pdf

Cardon

P. W.

(2002). A qualitative study of the perceptions of substitute teaching quality. SubJournal: For Personnel Responsible for Substitute Teaching, 3(2), 29–43.

Clifton

R. A.

Rambaran

(1987). Substitute teaching: Survival in a marginal situation. Urban Education, 22(3), 310–327. https://doi.org/10.1177/004208598702200303

Coverdill

J. E.

Oulevey

(2007). Getting contingent work: Insights into on-call work, matching processes, and staffing technology from a study of substitute teachers. The Sociological Quarterly, 48(3), 553–557. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.2007.00088.x

10.

Creswell

J. W.

Plano Clark

V. L.

(2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage.

11.

Deterding

N. M.

Waters

M. C.

(2021). Flexible coding of in-depth interviews: A twenty-first-century approach. Sociological Methods & Research, 50(2), 708–739. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124118799377

12.

Dorward

Hawkins

Smith

G. G.

(2000). Substitute teacher availability, pay, and influence on teacher professional development: A national survey. ERS Spectrum, 18(3), 40–46.

13.

Gardner

J. A.

Torres

A. C.

(2025). Gaining a better understanding of teacher absenteeism: How structural and organizational factors impact a teacher's decision to be absent. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 33(38), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.14 507/epaa.33.8625

14.

Gershenson

(2012). How do substitute teachers substitute? An empirical study of substitute-teacher labor supply. Economics of Education Review, 31, 410–430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2011.12.006

15.

Goldhaber

Lavery

Theobald

(2015). Uneven playing field? Assessing the teacher quality gap between advantaged and disadvantaged students. Educational Researcher, 44(5), 293–307. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x15592622

16.

Gonzales

(2017). Support for substitute teachers is crucial as shortage grows. Leadership, 46(3), 14–16.

17.

Griswold

P. A.

(2001). The substitute teacher: An irony of the school improvement process. Journal of School Improvement, 2(2), 33–38.

18.

Guarino

C. M.

Brown

A. B.

Wyse

A. E.

(2011). Can districts keep good teachers in the schools that need them most? Economics of Education Review, 30(5), 962–979. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2011.04.001

19.

Hegewisch

Jaimes

Mahoney

Mendoza

(2025). Women at work five years since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic: Any progress?Institute for Women's Policy Research. https://iwpr.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/Women-at-Work-Five-Years-Since-the-Start-of-the-COVID-19-Pandemic-fact-sheet_March-2025.pdf

20.

Henderson

Protheroe

Porch

(2002). What do we know about: Developing an effective substitute teacher program. Educational Research Service.

21.

Higgins

(2016, December 25). Wanted: Substitute teachers for Michigan classrooms. Detroit Free Press. http://www.freep.com/story/news/education/2016/12/25/michigan-substitute-teachers-shortages/95622652/

22.

Holme

Jabbar

Germain

Dinning

(2017). Rethinking teacher turnover: Longitudinal measures of instability in schools. Educational Researcher, 47(1), 62–75. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x17735813

23.

Jabbar

Castro

Germain

(2019). To switch or not to switch? The influence of school choice and labor market segmentation on teachers’ job searches. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 41(3), 375–399. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373719857689

24.

Johnson

S. M.

Kardos

S. M.

Kauffman

Liu

Donaldson

M. L.

(2004). The support gap: New teachers’ early experiences in high-income and low-income schools. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 12(61), 1–24. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ853526.pdf

25.

Joseph

Waymack

Zielaski

(2014). Roll call: The importance of teacher attendance. National Council on Teacher Quality. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED556249.pdf

26.

Kilbride

Rogers

Moriarty

Powell

(2025). Michigan teacher shortage study: 2025 report (Research report). Education Policy Innovation Collaborative. https://epicedpolicy.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/Teacher-Shortage-Report_Full-Report_Dec2024.pdf

27.

Kistler

H. C.

Djamaoeddin

Donohue

Papay

J. P.

Schwartz

N. L.

(2024). Pathways to the teaching profession: Teaching assistants’ and substitute teachers’ transitions into the teacher workforce (EdWorkingPaper No. 24-1089). Annenberg Institute for School Reform at Brown University. https://doi.org/10.26300/cb5b-aq50

28.

Kraft

M. A.

Lyon

M. A.

(2024). The rise and fall of the teaching profession: Prestige, interest, preparation, and satisfaction over the last half century. American Educational Research Journal, 61(6), 1192–1236. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312241276856

29.

Kraft

M. A.

Conklin

Falken

G. T.

(2022). Preferences, inequities, and incentives in the substitute teacher labor market (EdWorkingPaper No. 22-680). Annenberg Institute for School Reform at Brown University. https://doi.org/10.26300/tb06-3m94

30.

Lankford

Loeb

Wyckoff

(2002). Teacher sorting and the plight of urban schools: A descriptive analysis. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24(1), 37–62. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737024001037

31.

Liu

Loeb

Shi

(2022). More than shortages: The unequal distribution of substitute teaching. Education Finance and Policy, 17(2), 285–308. https://doi.org/10.1162/edfp_a_00329

32.

Lochmiller

C. R.

(2021). Conducting thematic analysis with qualitative data. The Qualitative Report, 26(6), 2029–2044. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2021.5008

33.

Loeb

Reininger

(2004). Public policy and teacher labor markets: What we know and why it matters. Education Policy Center, Michigan State University. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED485592.pdf

34.

Lortie

D. C.

(1975). Schoolteacher: A sociological study. University of Chicago Press.

35.

Merriam

S. B.

Tisdell

E. J.

(2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.

36.

Merrill

B. C.

(2021). Configuring a construct definition of teacher working conditions in the United States: A systematic narrative review of researcher concepts. Review of Educational Research, 91(2), 163–203. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654320985611

37.

Michigan Department of Education. (2019). Critical shortage: Academic years 2016–17, 2017–18, 2018–19, 2019–20 (critical shortage disciplines for employment of retirees). https://www.michigan.gov/-/media/Project/Websites/mde/educator_services/cert/critical_shortage/critical_shortage_retirees_list.pdf?rev=3ca00822898346a0a7244fde421e4263

38.

National Center for Education Statistics. (2024). Table 211.70i. Employment and average annual wage of short-term substitute teachers in elementary and secondary education industry, by state or jurisdiction: 2016, 2019, and 2022 [Data table]. U.S. Department of Education. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d23/tables/dt23_211.70i.asp

39.

National Education Association. (2017). Status of substitute teachers: A state-by-state summary. http://www.nea.org/home/14813.htm

40.

Patton

M. Q.

(2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). Sage.

41.

Polivka

A. E.

Nardone

(1989). On the definition of contingent work. Monthly Labor Review, 112, 9–16.

42.

Retkowsky

Nijs

Akkermans

Jansen

Khapova

S. N.

(2023). Toward a sustainable career perspective on contingent work: A critical review and a research agenda. Career Development International, 28(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1108/cdi-06-2022-0181

43.

Reupert

Sullivan

Tippett

White

Woodcock

Chen

Simons

(2023). An exploration of the experiences of substitute teachers: A systematic review. Review of Educational Research, 93(6), 901–941. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543221149418

44.

Saldaña

(2015). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). Sage.

45.

Strauss

R. P.

Strauss

D. A.

(2003). The market for substitute classroom teachers in southwest Pennsylvania in 2001–02. The Pittsburgh Foundation. https://www.andrew.cmu.edu/user/rs9f/substitute_8_4_03.pdf

46.

Strunk

K. O.

Harbatkin

McIlwain

Cullum

Torres

Watson

(2022). Partnership turnaround: Year four report. Education Policy Innovation Collaborative. https://epicedpolicy.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/Yr4_PartnershipRpt_Full.pdf

47.

Topchyan

Woehler

(2021). Do teacher status, gender, and years of teaching experience impact job satisfaction and work engagement? Education and Urban Society, 53(2), 119–145. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013124520926161

48.

Vialet

von Moos

(2021). Substantial classrooms: Redesigning the substitute teaching experience. Wiley.

49.

Weems

(2003). Representations of substitute teachers and the paradoxes of professionalism. Journal of Teacher Education, 54(3), 254–265. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487103054003007

50.

Wilkinson

French

(2019, August 7). Michigan leans on long-term substitutes as its schools struggle. Bridge Michigan. https://www.bridgemi.com/talent-education/michigan-leans-long-term-substitutes-its-schools-struggle

51.

Zubrzycki

(2012, July 17). Substitute teaching undergoes new scrutiny. Education Week. https://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2012/07/18/36substitutes_ep.h31.html

52.

Zuo

Hueget

Steiner

E. D.

(2023). Principal perspectives on school staffing struggles: Findings from the 2022 Learn Together Survey (Research Report No. RRA827-14). RAND Corporation. https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA827-14.html