A Quasi-Experimental Investigation of How the Gates Millennium Scholars Program Is Related to College Students’ Time Use and Activities

Abstract

A national scholarship program provided by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation is designed to improve access to and success in higher education for low-income high-achieving minority students by providing them with full tuition scholarships and non-monetary support. We use a regression discontinuity approach to investigate whether the receipt of the scholarship changes the use of time and participation in different activities among college students during their freshmen and junior years. We find that receiving a Gates scholarship reduces hours worked per week, as well as influencing high participation in volunteering activities and cultural events. The sub-group analyses reveal racial/ethnic differences in the allocation of time to and the levels of participation in various activities in response to the Gates scholarship.

Keywords

time allocation financial aid regression discontinuity student time use minority student

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Angrist

Lavy

(1999). Using Maimonides’ rule to estimate the effect of class size on scholastic achievement. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114, 533–575.

Angrist

J. D.

Pischke

(2009). Mostly harmless econometrics: An empiricist’s companion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Aries

McCarthy

Salovev

Banaji

(2004). Athletes at highly selective colleges: Academic performance and personal development. Research in Higher Education, 45(6), 577–602.

Astin

A. W.

(1993). What matters in college? Four critical years revisited. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Astin

Sax

Avalos

(1999). Long-term effects of volunteerism during the undergraduate years. Review of Higher Education, 22(2), 187–202.

Becker

G. S.

(1965). A theory of the allocation of time. Economic Journal, 75, 493–517.

Becker

G. S.

(1967). Human capital and the personal distribution of income. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Becker

G. S.

(1993). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education (3rd ed.). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Beer

(1992). Classroom and home study times and grades while at college using a single-subject design. Psychological Reports, 71, 233–234.

10.

Ben-Porath

(1967). The production of human capital and the life cycle of earnings. Journal of Political Economy, 75, 352–365.

11.

Bill and Melinda Gates announce new Millennium Scholars program to bridge the gap in access to higher education. (1999, September 16). Business Wire.

12.

Black

D. M.

(1999). The uncertain relationship between board composition and firm performance. The Business Lawyer, 54(3), 921–964.

13.

Britton

Tesser

(1991). Effects of time management practices on college grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(3), 405–410.

14.

Campbell

Svenson

Jarvis

(1992). Perceived level of stress among university undergraduate students in Edmonton, Canada. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 75(2), 552–554.

15.

Cheng

Alcantara

(2007). Assessing working students’ college experiences: A grounded theory approach. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 32(3), 301–311.

16.

Cohn

Geske

T. G.

(1990). The economics of education (3rd ed.). Oxford: Pergamon Press.

17.

Cook

T. D.

(2008). “Waiting for life to arrive”: A history of the regression-discontinuity design in psychology, statistics and economics. Journal of Econometrics, 142(2), 636–654.

18.

Cook

T. D.

Campbell

D. T.

(1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings. Chicago: Rand McNally.

19.

Davis

Murrell

(1993). A structural model of perceived academic, personal, and vocational gains related to college student responsibility. Research in Higher Education, 34, 267–289.

20.

DesJardins

S. L.

McCall

B. P.

(2010). The impact of the Gates Millennium Scholars Program on the retention, college finance- and work-related choices, and future educational aspirations of low-income minority students. Unpublished manuscript, University of Michigan.

21.

DesJardins

S. L.

Toutkoushian

R. K.

(2005). Are students really rational? The development of rational thought and its application to student choice. In Smart

J. C.

(Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 20, pp. 191–240). Netherlands: Springer.

22.

Dolton

Marcenaro

Navarro

(2003). The effective use of student time: A stochastic frontier production function case study. Economics of Education Review, 22, 547–560.

23.

Dundes

Marx

(2006). Balancing work and academics in college: Why do students working 10 to 19 hours per week excel? Journal of College Student Retention, 8(1), 107–120.

24.

Ehrenberg

R. G.

Sherman

D. R.

(1987). Employment while in college, academic achievement, and post-college outcomes. Journal of Human Resources, 22(1), 1–24.

25.

Fjortoft

N. F.

(1995). College student employment: Opportunity or deterrent? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 386079)

26.

Furr

Elling

(2000). The influence of work on college student development. NASPA Journal, 37(2), 454–470.

27.

Gellin

(2003). The effect of undergraduate student involvement on critical thinking: A meta-analysis of the literature 1991-2000. Journal of College Student Development, 44(6), 746–762.

28.

George

Dixon

Stansal

Gelb

Pheri

(2008). Time diary and questionnaire assessment of factors associated with academic and personal success among university undergraduates. Journal of American College Health, 56(6), 706–715.

29.

Guryan

(2000). Does money matter? Regression discontinuity estimates from education finance reform in Massachusetts. Working paper, The University of Chicago.

30.

Hahn

Todd

Klaauw

W.V.d.

(2001). Identification and estimation of treatment effects with a regression-discontinuity design. Econometrica, 69(1), 201–209.

31.

Heller

D. E.

(1997). Student price response in higher education—An update to Leslie and Brinkman. Journal of Higher Education, 68(6), 624–657.

32.

Henry

G. T.

Rubenstein

(2002). Paying for grades: Impact of merit-based financial aid on educational quality. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 21(1), 93–109.

33.

Holland

(1986). Statistics and causal inference. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 81(396), 945–960.

34.

Hood

Craig

Ferguson

(1992). The impact of athletics, part-time employment, and other academic activities on academic achievement. Journal of College Student Development, 33, 447–453.

35.

Horn

(1998). Undergraduates who work: National postsecondary student aid study. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.

36.

Hotz

Tienda

Ahituv

(2002). Are there returns to the wages of young men from working while in school? Review of Economics and Statistics, 84(2), 221–236.

37.

Huang

Chang

(2004). Academic and co-curricular involvement: Their relationship and best combinations for student growth. Journal of College Student Development, 45(4), 391–406.

38.

Jacob

B. A.

Lefgren

(2002). The impact of teacher training on student achievement: Quasi-experimental evidence from school reform efforts in Chicago. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 8916.

39.

Kane

T. J.

(2003). A quasi-experimental estimate of the impact of financial aid on college-going. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 9703.

40.

Kuh

(1999). How are we doing? Tracking the quality of the undergraduate experience, 1960s to the present. The Review of Higher Education, 22(2), 99–120.

41.

Kuh

G. D.

Kinzie

J. I.

Schuh

J. H.

Whitt

E. J.

& Associates. (2005). Student success in college: Creating conditions that matter. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

42.

Lahmers

Zulauf

(2000). The secret to academic success: Hours and hours of study. Journal of College Student Development, 41(5), 545–554.

43.

Lammers

Onwuegbuzie

Slate

(2001). Academic success as a function of the gender, class, age, study habits, and employment of college students. Research in the Schools, 8(2), 71–81.

44.

Lee

D. S.

Lemieux

(2009). Regression discontinuity designs in economics. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

45.

Lemieux

Milligan

(2004). Incentive effects of social assistance: A regression discontinuity approach. NBER Working Paper No. 10541, Cambridge, MA.

46.

Leppel

(2002). Similarities and differences in the college persistence of men and women. Review of Higher Education, 25(4), 433–450.

47.

Levin

H. M.

Tsang

M. C.

(1987). The economics of student time. Economics of Education Review, 6(4), 357–364.

48.

Light

(2001). In-school work experience and the returns to schooling. Journal of Labor Economics, 19(1), 65–93.

49.

Lohfink

Paulsen

(2005). Comparing the determinants of persistence for first-generation and continuing-generation students. Journal of College Student Development, 46(4), 409–428.

50.

Lundberg

(2004). Working and learning: The role of involvement for employed students. NASPA Journal, 41(2), 201–215.

51.

Macan

Shahani

Dipboye

Phillips

(1990). College students’ time management: Correlations with academic performance and stress. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(4), 760–768.

52.

Markus

Howard

King

(1993). Integrating community service and classroom instruction enhances learning: Results from an experiment. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 15(4), 410–419.

53.

Martorell

(2004). Do high school graduation exams matter? A regression discontinuity approach. Unpublished manuscript, University of California Berkeley. Retrieved March 15, 2006, from http://www.utdallas.edu/research/tsp/pdfpapers/paper38.pdf

54.

Michaels

Miethe

(1989). Academic effort and college grades. Social Forces, 68(1), 309–319.

55.

Miller

Danner

Staten

(2008). Relationship of work hours with selected health behaviors and academic progress among a college student cohort. Journal of American College Health, 56(6), 675–679.

56.

Mincer

(1958). Investment in human capital and personal income distribution. Journal of Political Economy, 66(4), 281–302.

57.

Misra

McKean

(2000). College students’ academic stress and its relation to their anxiety, time management, and leisure satisfaction. American Journal of Health Studies, 16(1), 41–51.

58.

Moore

Lovell

McGann

Wyrick

(1998). Why involvement matters: A review of research on student involvement in the collegiate setting. College Student Affairs Journal, 17(2), 4–17.

59.

Mouw

Khanna

(1993). Prediction of academic success: A review of the literature and some recommendations. College Student Journal, 27(3), 328–336.

60.

Nonis

Hudson

(2006). Academic performance of college students: Influence of time spent studying and working. Journal of Education for Business, 81(3), 151–159.

61.

Nonis

Philhours

Hudson

(2006). Where does the time go? A diary approach to business and marketing students’ time use. Journal of Marketing Education, 28(2), 121–134.

62.

Pace

C. R.

(1980). Measuring the quality of student effort. Current Issues in Higher Education, 2, 10–16.

63.

Pascarella

Edison

Nora

Hagedorn

Terenzini

(1998). Does work inhibit cognitive development during college? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 20(2), 75–93.

64.

Pascarella

Pierson

Wolniak

Terenzini

(2004). First-generation college students: Additional evidence on college experiences and outcomes. Journal of Higher Education, 75(3), 249–284.

65.

Pascarella

Terenzini

(1991). How college affects students: Findings and insight from twenty years of research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

66.

Pascarella

Terenzini

(2005). How college affects students: A third decade of research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

67.

Paulsen

M. B.

(2001). The economics of human capital and investment in higher education. In Paulsen

M. B.

Smart

J. C.

(Eds.), The finance of higher education: Theory, research, policy & practice (pp. 55–94). New York: Agathon Press.

68.

Paulsen

M. B.

St. John

E. P.

(2002). Social class and college costs: Examining the financial nexus between college choice and persistence. Journal of Higher Education, 73(2), 189–236.

69.

Perna

L. W.

Titus

M. A.

(2004). Understanding differences in the choice of college attended: The role of state public policies. Review of Higher Education, 27(4), 501–526.

70.

Plant

E. A.

Ericsson

K. A.

Hill

Asberg

(2005). Why study time does not predict grade point average across college students: Implications of deliberate practice for academic performance. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30(1), 96–116.

71.

Rau

Durand

(2000). The academic ethic and college grades: Does hard work help students to “make the grade”? Sociology of Education, 73, 19–38.

72.

Riggert

Boyle

Petrosko

Ash

Rude-Parkins

(2006). Student employment and higher education: Empiricism and contradiction. Review of Educational Research, 76(1), 63–92.

73.

Rubin

D. B.

(1978). Bayesian inference for causal effects: The role of randomization. Annals of Statistics, 6, 34–58.

74.

Schneider

Carnoy

Kilpatrick

Schmidt

W. H.

Shavelson

R. J.

(2008). Estimating causal effects using experimental and observational designs. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.

75.

Schulman

Bowen

(2001). The game of life: College sports and educational values. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

76.

Schultz

T. W.

(1961). Investment in human capital. The American Economic Review, 51(1), 1–17.

77.

Schuman

Walsh

Olson

Etheridge

(1985). Effort and reward: The assumption that college grades are affected by quantity of study. Social Forces, 63(4), 945–966.

78.

Sedlacek

W. E.

(1998). Admissions in higher education: Measuring cognitive and non-cognitive variables. In Wilds

D. J.

Wilson

(Eds.), Minorities in higher education 1997-98: Sixteenth annual status report (pp. 47–71). Washington, DC: American Council on Education.

79.

Sedlacek

W. E.

(2003). Alternative measures in admissions and scholarship selection. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 35, 263–272.

80.

Sedlacek

W. E.

(2004). Beyond the big test: Noncognitive assessment in higher education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

81.

Shadish

W. R.

Cook

T. D.

Campbell

D. T.

(2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.

82.

Stern

Nakata

(1991). Paid employment among U.S. college students: Trends, effects and possible causes. The Journal of Higher Education, 62(1), 25–43.

83.

Stinebrickner

(2003). Working during school and academic performance. Journal of Labor Economics, 21(2), 473–491.

84.

Stinebrickner

(2004). Time-use and college outcomes. Journal of Econometrics, 121, 243–269.

85.

Stinebrickner

(2008). The causal effect of studying on academic performance. B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 8(1), Article 14.

86.

Svanum

Bigatti

(2006). The influences of course effort and outside activities on grades in a college course. Journal of College Student Development, 47(5), 564–576.

87.

Terenzini

Springer

Pascarella

Nora

(1995). Influences affecting the development of students’ critical thinking skills. Research in Higher Education, 36(1), 23–39.

88.

Thistlewaite

D. L.

Campbell

D. T.

(1960). Regression discontinuity analysis: An alternative to the ex post facto experiment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 51, 309–317.

89.

Tilghman

(2007). Expanding equal opportunity: The Princeton experience with financial aid. Harvard Educational Review, 77(4), 435–441.

90.

Tripp

(1997). Greek organizations and student development: A review of the research. College Student Affairs Journal, 16, 31–39.

91.

Trochim

W.M. K.

(1984). Research design for program evaluation: The regression-discontinuity approach. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

92.

Van der Klaauw

(2002). Estimating the effect of financial aid offers on college enrollment: A regression-discontinuity approach. International Economic Review, 43(4), 1249–1287.

93.

Young

Klemz

Murphy

(2003). Enhancing learning outcomes: The effects of instructional technology, learning styles, instructional methods, and student behavior. Journal of Marketing Education, 25(2), 130–142.