The Academic Effects of Moving to Middle School on Students With Disabilities Relative to Their General Education Peers

Abstract

Middle school transitions are increasingly required, despite documented negative effects on general education students (GENs). We explore if and how the move to middle school differentially affects students with disabilities (SWDs), a large and low-performing group. Using an instrumental variables strategy and New York City (NYC) data on nine student cohorts, we find the middle school transition causes a 0.29 SD decline in SWD math performance, a 0.16 SD decline in English language-arts (ELA) performance, and a one percentage point increase in grade retention. Accounting for potential mediators (e.g., peer cohort stability) does not substantially explain estimated effects on SWD performance. However, the middle school transition has similarly large negative effects on GENs, suggesting the need to ease this transition for all students.

Keywords

middle schools special education educational policy longitudinal studies quasi-experimental analysis regression analyses secondary data analysis

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Akos

(2017). Transition programs. In Mertens

S. B.

Caskey

M. M.

Flowes

(Eds.), The encyclopedia of middle grades education (2nd ed., pp. 407–411). Information Age Publishing.

Akos

Rose

R. A.

Orthner

(2015). Sociodemographic moderators of middle school transition effects on academic achievement. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 35(2), 170–198. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431614529367

Anderson

K. P.

(2021). The relationship between inclusion, absenteeism, and disciplinary outcomes for students with disabilities. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 43(1), 32–59. https://doi.org/10.0.12.30/0162373720968558

Anderson

M. L.

(2008). Multiple inference and gender differences in the effects of early intervention: A reevaluation of the Abecedarian, Perry preschool, and Early Training Projects. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 103(484), 1481–1495. https://doi.org/10.1198/016214508000000841

Angrist

J. D.

Pischke

(2008). Mostly harmless econometrics. Princeton University Press.

Arcia

(2007). A comparison of elementary/K-8 and middle schools’ suspension rates. Urban Education, 42(5), 456–469. https://doi.org/10.0.4.153/0042085907304879

Atteberry

Wedow

Cook

N. J.

McEachin

(2022). A replication of a quasi-experimental approach to estimating middle school structural transition effects on student learning trajectories. Educational Policy, 36(7), 1612–1651. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904820987797

Balfanz

(2009). Putting middle grades students on the graduation path: A policy and practice brief. National Middle School Association. https://www.amle.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/Policy_Brief_Balfanz.pdf

Ballis

Heath

(2021). The long-run impacts of special education. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 13(4), 72–111. https://doi.org/10.0.4.233/pol.20190603

10.

Barnard-Brak

Lechtenberger

(2010). Student IEP participation and academic achievement across time. Remedial and Special Education, 31(5), 343–349. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932509338382

11.

Boston Public Schools. (2018). BuildBPS phase ii proposed facilities plan, 2018–2027. https://www.bostonpublicschools.org/cms/lib/MA01906464/Centricity/Domain/1901/BuildBPSversion2.pdf

12.

Byrnes

Ruby

(2007). Comparing achievement between K–8 and middle schools: A large-scale empirical study. American Journal of Education, 114(1), 101–135. https://doi.org/10.0.4.62/520693

13.

Cappella

Schwartz

Hill

Kim

H. Y.

Seidman

(2019). A national sample of eighth-grade students: The impact of middle grade schools on academic and psychosocial competence. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 39(2), 167–200. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431617735653

14.

Cosier

Causton-Theoharis

Theoharis

(2013). Does access matter? Time in general education and achievement for students with disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 34(6), 323–332. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932513485448

15.

DiSalvo

R. W.

(2022). An examination of test score trajectories around school switching due to grade configuration. Education Finance and Policy, 17(1), 27–52. https://doi.org/10.0.4.138/edfp_a_00336

16.

Edwards

(2019). Cut costs, not ribbons: Alternatives that reduce school crowding. Citizens Budget Commission. https://cbcny.org/research/cut-costs-not-ribbons

17.

Every Student Succeeds Act, 20 U.S.C. § 6301. (2016). https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/senate-bill/1177

18.

Fish

R. E.

(2019). Standing out and sorting in: Exploring the role of racial composition in racial disparities in special education. American Educational Research Journal, 56(6), 2573–2608. https://doi.org/10.0.12.30/0002831219847966

19.

Giano

Williams

A. L.

Becnel

J. N.

(2022). Grade retention and school dropout: Comparing specific grade levels across childhood and early adolescence. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 42(1), 33–57. https://doi.org/10.0.4.153/02724316211010332

20.

Gilmour

A. F.

Henry

G. T.

(2018). A comparison of teacher quality in math for late elementary and middle school students with and without disabilities. The Elementary School Journal, 118(3), 426–451. https://doi.org/10.1086/696140

21.

Goldman

S. E.

Burke

M. M.

(2017). The effectiveness of interventions to increase parent involvement in special education: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Exceptionality, 25(2), 97–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/09362835.2016.1196444

22.

Goldring

Taie

Riddles

(2014). Teacher attrition and mobility: Results from the 2012-13 teacher follow-up survey (NCES 2014-077). National Center for Education Statistics. https://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2014077

23.

Gottfried

M. A.

(2010). Evaluating the relationship between student attendance and achievement in urban elementary and middle schools: An instrumental variables approach. American Educational Research Journal, 47(2), 434–465. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831209350494

24.

Grades 3–8 Technical Information and Reports. (n.d.). New York State Education Department. https://www.nysed.gov/state-assessment/grades-3-8-technical-information-and-reports

25.

Hanushek

E. A.

Kain

J. F.

Rivkin

S. G.

(2002). Inferring program effects for special populations: Does special education raise achievement for students with disabilities? The Review of Economics and Statistics, 84(4), 584–599. https://doi.org/10.0.4.138/003465302760556431

26.

Hong

Zimmer

Engberg

(2018). How does grade configuration impact student achievement in elementary and middle school grades? Journal of Urban Economics, 105, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.0.3.248/j.jue.2018.02.002

27.

Hurwitz

Perry

Cohen

E. D.

Skiba

(2020). Special education and individualized academic growth: A longitudinal assessment of outcomes for students with disabilities. American Educational Research Journal, 57(2), 576–611. https://doi.org/10.0.12.30/0002831219857054

28.

Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act, 20 U.S.C. § 1350. (2004). https://www.congress.gov/bill/108th-congress/house-bill/1350

29.

James

(2018). Students with disabilities transitioning from elementary to middle school: A qualitative study (Publication No. 2071904803) [Doctoral dissertation, Capella University]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. https://www-proquest-com-s.web.bisu.edu.cn/docview/2071904803/abstract/5D14058586DC4E73PQ/1

30.

Jessen

S. B.

(2013). Special education & school choice: The complex effects of small schools, school choice and public high school policy in New York City. Educational Policy, 27(3), 427–466. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904812453997

31.

Jones

Winters

M. A.

(2022). Are two teachers better than one?: The effect of co-teaching on students with and without disabilities. Journal of Human Resources, 0420-10834R3. https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.0420-10834R3

32.

Kim

H. Y.

Schwartz

Cappella

Seidman

(2014). Navigating middle grades: Role of social contexts in middle grade school climate. American Journal of Community Psychology, 54(1–2), 28–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-014-9659-x

33.

Knesting

Hokanson

Waldron

(2008). Settling in: Facilitating the transition to an inclusive middle school for students with mild disabilities. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 55(3), 265–276. https://doi.org/10.1080/10349120802268644

34.

Lai

Wood

W. J.

Imberman

S. A.

Jones

N. D.

Strunk

K. O.

(2021). Teacher quality gaps by disability and socioeconomic status: Evidence from Los Angeles. Educational Researcher, 50(2), 74–85. https://doi.org/10.0.12.30/0013189X20955170

35.

Mac Iver

M. A.

Mac Iver

D. J

. (2006). Which bets paid off? Early findings on the impact of private management and K-8 conversion reforms on the achievement of Philadelphia Students. Review of Policy Research, 23(5), 1077–1093. https://doi.org/10.0.4.87/j.1541-1338.2006.00250.x

36.

Mariano

L. T.

Martorell

Berglund

(2018). The effects of grade retention on high school outcomes: Evidence from New York City Schools. RAND Corporation. https://www.rand.org/pubs/working_papers/WR1259.html

37.

Marinell

W. H.

Coca

V. M.

(2013). Who stays and who leaves? Findings from a three-part study of teacher turnover in NYC middle schools. The Research Alliance for New York City Schools. https://research.steinhardt.nyu.edu/research_alliance/publications/ttp_synthesis

38.

Merlin

(2020). Spotlight on American Education Week, Part 1: Celebrating U.S. public education with the National Teacher and Principal Survey (NTPS). National Center for Education Statistics. https://nces.ed.gov/blogs/nces/2020/11/18/default

39.

Morgan

P. L.

Wang

Woods

A. D.

Mandel

Farkas

Hillemeier

M. M.

(2019). Are U.S. schools discriminating when suspending students with disabilities? A best-evidence synthesis. Exceptional Children, 86(1), 7–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402919868528

40.

National Center for Education Statistics. (2020). Table 204.60. Percentage distribution of students 6 to 21 years old served under Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), Part B, by educational environment and type of disability: Selected years, fall 1989 through fall 2018. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d19/tables/dt19_204.60.asp

41.

NYC Department of Education ASD Nest Program. (n.d.). https://steinhardt.nyu.edu/metrocenter/asdnest/new-york-city

42.

Perry and Associates. (2012). Educating all students well: Special education reform in New York City Public Schools. Fund for public advocacy. https://www.perryandassociatesinc.com/NYC%20-%20Special-Ed-Report_August-2012.pdf

43.

Rockoff

J. E.

Lockwood

B. B.

(2010). Stuck in the middle: Impacts of grade configuration in public schools. Journal of Public Economics, 94(11), 1051–1061. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2010.06.017

44.

Samuels

C. A.

(2013). Los Angeles moves to “mainstream” hundreds of students. Education Week. https://www.edweek.org/leadership/los-angeles-moves-to-mainstream-hundreds-of-students/2013/06

45.

Schaffer

M. E.

(2010). xtivreg2: Stata module to perform extended IV/2SLS, GMM and AC/HAC, LIML and k-class regression for panel data models. http://ideas.repec.org/c/boc/bocode/s456501.html

46.

Schenker

Gentleman

J. F.

(2001). On judging the significance of differences by examining the overlap between confidence intervals. The American Statistician, 55(3), 182–186. https://doi.org/10.1198/000313001317097960

47.

Schnoes

Reid

Wagner

Marder

(2006). ADHD among students receiving special education services: A national survey. Exceptional Children, 72(4), 483–496. https://doi.org/10.0.4.153/001440290607200406

48.

Schwartz

A. E.

Hopkins

B. G.

Stiefel

(2021). The effects of special education on the academic performance of students with learning disabilities. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 40(2), 480–520. https://doi.org/10.0.3.234/pam.22282

49.

Schwartz

A. E.

Stiefel

Cordes

S. A.

(2017). Moving matters: The causal effect of moving schools on student performance. Education Finance and Policy, 12(4), 419–446. https://doi.org/10.0.4.138/edfp_a_00198

50.

Schwartz

A. E.

Stiefel

Rubenstein

Zabel

(2011). The path not taken: How does school organization affect eighth-grade achievement? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 33(3), 293–317. https://doi.org/10.0.12.30/0162373711407062

51.

Schwerdt

West

M. R.

(2013). The impact of alternative grade configurations on student outcomes through middle and high school. Journal of Public Economics, 97, 308–326. https://doi.org/10.0.3.248/j.jpubeco.2012.10.002

52.

Setren

(2021). Targeted vs. general education investments: Evidence from special education and English language learners in Boston Charter Schools. The Journal of Human Resources, 56(4), 1073–1112. https://doi.org/10.0.13.40/jhr.56.4.0219-10040R2

53.

Shifrer

(2013). Stigma of a label: Educational expectations for high school students labeled with learning disabilities. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 54(4), 462–480. https://doi.org/10.0.4.153/0022146513503346

54.

SRI International. (2005). Declassification—Students who leave special education. https://seels.sri.com/designdocs/SEELS_Declass_FINAL.pdf

55.

Stiefel

Shiferaw

Schwartz

A. E.

Gottfried

(2018). Who feels included in school? Exa mining feelings of inclusion among students with disabilities. Educational Researcher, 47(2), 105–120. https://doi.org/10.0.12.30/0013189X17738761

56.

Welsh

R. O.

(2017). School Hopscotch: A comprehensive review of K–12 student mobility in the United States. Review of Educational Research, 87(3), 475–511. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316672068

57.

Welsh

R. O.

Little

(2018). The school discipline dilemma: A comprehensive review of disparities and alternative approaches. Review of Educational Research, 88(5), 752–794. https://doi.org/10.0.12.30/0034654318791582

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.32 MB