Objective: The release of patients from a security patients hospital has been the subject of public controversy. The present study uses empirical data to examine the length of stay, leave, and re-offending of patients from a security hospital.
Methods: Survival analysis was used to examine factors that may be predictive of length of stay and time under restriction, as well as time to first overnight leave. Data on re-offending were obtained from a variety of sources and were compared with seriousness of index offences.
Results: Consistent with international research, patients with more serious offences had longer hospitalisations. Patients with more serious offences were also hospitalised for longer periods before leave was granted. Compared with international studies, re-offending was in the lower range.
Conclusions: Despite concerns raised in the media regarding patient ‘dangerousness’, time spent in hospital and the granting of leave, patients with serious offences were more likely to be hospitalised longer, which suggests decision makers do take into account public safety.
References
1.
FreibergA.The disposition of mentally disordered offenders in Australia: ‘Out of mind, out of sight’ revisited. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law1994; 1:97–118.
2.
ShawJWhiteLJenningsIFuglerAFerrisPO'BrienK.Not guilty by reason of insanity: A quantitative review in South Australia. In: FreckeltonIGreigDMcMahonM (eds). Forensic Issues in Mental Health: Proceedings of the 12th Annual Congress of the Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law. Auckland: Conference Publishing, 1991.
3.
RabinerC.Releasing NGRI offenders: The Larsen Case. Psychiatric Annals1992; 22:574–578.
4.
PerlinM.Myths, realities, and the political world: The anthropology of the insanity defense attitudes. Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and Law1996; 24:5–26.
5.
SnowdenP.Regional secure units and forensic services in England and Wales. In: BluglassRBowdenP (eds). Principles and Practice of Forensic Psychiatry. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 1990:1375–1386.
6.
ReedJ.Risk assessment and clinical management: The lessons from recent inquiries. British Journal of Psychiatry.1997; 170(Suppl. 32):4–7.
7.
MasonKRyanABennettH.Report of the Committee of Inquiry Into Procedures in Certain Psychiatric Hospitals in Relation to Admission, Discharge, or Release on Leave of Certain Classes of Psychiatric Patients. Wellington: Department of Health, 1988.
8.
SteadmanHCocozzaJ.Careers of the Criminally Insane: Excessive Social Control of Deviance. Lexington: Lexington Books, 1974.
9.
PotasI.Just Deserts for the Mad. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology, 1982.
10.
DellS.Transfer of special hospital patients into national health service hospitals. In: GunnJFarringtonD (eds). Abnormal Offenders, Delinquency and the Criminal Justice System. Chichester: John Wiley, 1982:325–338.
11.
GoldingSEavesDKowazA.The assessment, treatment and community outcome of insanity acquittees: Forensic history and response to treatment. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry1989; 12:149–179.
12.
HarrisGRiceMCormierC.Length of detention in matched groups of insanity acquittees and convicted offenders. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry1991; 14:223–236.
13.
GilesD.Insane killers walk free. The Sunday Mail1995; 21 May; 3.
14.
KochT.Theatre of the absurd. Courier Mail1997; 14 October: 15.
15.
American Psychiatric Association.Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 3rd edn, revised.Washington: American Psychiatric Association, 1987.
16.
Australian Bureau of Statistics.Australian National Classification of Offences, 1985. Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics, 1986.
17.
CollettD.Modelling Survival Data in Medical Research. London: Chapman and Hall, 1994.
18.
WillettJSingerJ.Investigating onset, cessation, relapse and recovery: Why you should, and how you can, use discrete-time survival analysis to examine event occurence. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology1993; 61:952–965.
SilverE.Punishment or treatment? Comparing the lengths of confinement of successful and unsuccessful insanity defendants. Law and Human Behavior1995; 19:375–388.
21.
WiederandersM.Recidivism of disordered offenders who were conditionally vs. unconditionally released. Behavioral Sciences and the Law1992; 10:141–148.
22.
WiederandersMBromleyDChoateP.Forensic conditional release programs and outcomes in three states. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry1997; 20:249–257.
23.
CavanaughJWasyliwO.Treating the not guilty by reason of insanity outpatient: A two-year study. Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law1985; 13:407–415.
24.
BogenbergerRPasewarkRGudemanHBeiberS.Follow-up of insanity acquittees in Hawaii. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry1987; 10:283–295.
25.
HeilbrunKGriffinP.Community-based forensic treatment of insanity acquittees. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry1993; 16:133–150.
26.
HodginsS.A follow-up study of persons found incompetent to stand trial and/or not guilty by reason of insanity in Quebec. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry1983; 6:399–411.
27.
RiceMHarrisG.A comparison of criminal recidivism among schizophrenic and non-schizophrenic offenders. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry1992; 15:397408.
28.
RussoG.Follow-up of 91 mentally ill criminals discharged from the maximum security hospital in Barcelona P.G. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry1994; 17:279–1994.
29.
SilverSCohenMSpodakM.Follow-up after release of insanity acquittees, mentally disordered offenders and convicted felons. Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and Law1989; 17:387–400.
30.
BaileyJMacCulloghM.Characteristics of 112 cases discharged directly from a new special hospital and some comparisons of performance. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry1993; 3:91–112.
31.
BuchananA.Criminal conviction after discharge from special (high-security) hospital. British Journal of Psychiatry1998; 172:472–476.
32.
SteadmanHMulveyEMonahanJViolence by people discharged from acute psychiatric inpatient facilities and others in the same neighborhoods. Archives of General Psychiatry1998; 55:393–401.
33.
WesselyS.The epidemiology of crime, violence and schizophrenia. British Journal of Psychiatry1997; 170(Suppl. 32):8–11.
34.
SteadmanHCocozzaJ.The criminally insane patient: Who gets out?Social Psychiatry1973; 8:230–238.
35.
QuinseyVMaguireA.Maximum security psychiatric patients: Actuarial and clinical prediction of dangerousness. Journal of Interpersonal Violence1986; 1:143–171.
