A case is made for using thermoplastics in prosthetics and orthotics when available in developing countries due to the cost-benefits that may accrue.
References
1.
BlesseyR. L.HislopH. J.WatersR. L.AntoneixiD. Metabolic energy cost of unrestrained walking. Phys. Ther.1976; 56: 1019–1024
2.
ConveryP.HughesJ.JonesD.WhitefieldG. A clinical evaluation of an ultra-lightweight polypropylene below-knee prosthesis. Orthot. Trosthet.1986; 40(3)30–37
3.
ÖbergK. Report on Orthopaedic Technology in Major Centres in Thailand, India and Jordan: a report commissioned by WHO RHB/HO. WHO, Geneva1988
4.
ÖbergK.GoerdtA. Report on WHO/ AIARF/NRC Inter-regional Seminar on Orthopaedic Technology in Developing Countries. Dakar, Senegal May—3 June, 1989; 29: 1989, WHO/ RHB/89.1
5.
QuigleyM. J.IronsG. P.DonalsonN. R. The Rancho ultralight below-knee prosthesis. Rancho Los Amigos Hospital, Downey, CA1977; 1977, Rehabilitation Engineering Centre, University of Southern California
6.
TerseliusB. Polymerteknologi. Kungliga Tekniska Högskolan. Inst för polymerteknologi. StockholmSweden1988