Abstract
The purpose of the study was to measure objectively the home use of the reciprocating gait orthosis (RGO) and the electrically augmented (hybrid) RGO. It was hypothesised that RGO use would increase following provision of functional electrical stimulation (FES). Five adult subjects participated in the study with spinal cord lesions ranging from C2 (incomplete) to T6. Selection criteria included active RGO use and suitability for electrical stimulation. Home RGO use was measured for up to 18 months by determining the mean number of steps taken per week. During this time patients were supplied with the hybrid system. Three alternatives for the measurement of steps taken were investigated: a commercial digital pedometer, a magnetically actuated counter and a heel contact switch linked to an electronic counter. The latter was found to be the most reliable system and was used for all measurements. Additional information on RGO use was acquired using three patient diaries administered throughout the study and before and after the provision of the hybrid system. Testing of the original hypothesis was complicated by problems in finding a reliable measurement tool and difficulties with data collection. However, the results showed that overall use of the RGO, whether with or without stimulation, is low. Statistical analysis of the step counter results was not realistic. No statistically significant change in RGO use was found between the patient diaries. The study suggests that the addition of electrical stimulation does not increase RGO use. The study highlights the problem of objectively measuring orthotic use in the home.