The effect of reciprocally linking the hip hinges of a hip-knee-ankle-foot orthosis on standing performance was studied in a comparative trial of the Advanced Reciprocating Gait Orthosis (ARGO) and an ARGO in which the Bowden cable was removed (A_GO). Six male subjects with spinal cord injury (SCI) at T4 to T12 level participated in the study, which was conducted using a single case experimental design. Standing balance, the ability to handle balance disturbances (standing stability), and the performance of a functional hand task during standing were assessed in both orthosis configurations in the order A_GO-ARGO-A_GO-ARGO.
No significant differences with respect to standing performance were found for the two orthosis configurations. However, the results indicate that the crutch force needed for maintaining balance during various tasks, especially for quiet standing with two crutches, may be much higher in the orthosis without Bowden cable. Therefore, it is very likely that the reciprocal hip joint link in the ARGO provides a substantial and clinically relevant reduction of upper body effort required for standing under functional conditions.
References
1.
AndrewsB JBarnettR WPhillipsG FKjrkwoodC ADonaldsonNRushtonD NPerkinsT A. Rule-based control of a hybrid FES orthosis for assisting paraplegic locomotion. Aulomedica1989; 11: 175–199
2.
CybulskiG RJaegerR J. Standing performance of persons with paraplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1986; 67: 103–108
3.
DouglasRLarsonP FD'AmbrosiaRMcCallR E. The LSU reciprocating gait orthosis. Orthopedics1983; 6: 834–839
4.
FerrarinMStallardJPalmieriRPedottiA. Estimation of deformation in a walking orthosis for paraplegic patients. Clin Biomech1993; 8: 255–261
5.
FerrarinMRabuffettiM. On the improvement provided by hip transversal rotation on paraplegic gait walking with reciprocating orthosis. Neuroprosthetics — from basic research to clinical applications, PedottiAFerarinMQuinternJReinerR. Springer-Verlag, Berlin1996; 493–502
6.
FigoniS F. Cardiovascular and haemodynamic responses to tilting and to standing in tetraplegic patients: a review. Paraplegia1984; 22: 99–109
7.
GellmanHSibIWatersR L. Late complications of the weight-bearing upper extremity in the paraplegic patient. Clin Orthop1988; 233: 132–135
8.
GeurtsA CHNienhuisBMulderThW. Intrasubject variability of selected force-platform parameters in quantification of postural control. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1993; 74: 1144–1150
9.
GoldieP ABachT MEvansO M. Force platform measures for evaluating postural control: reliability and validity. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1989; 70: 510–517
10.
IjzermanM JBaardmanGHermensH JVeltinkP HBoomH BKZilvoldG. The influence of the reciprocal cable linkage in the advanced reciprocating gait orthosis on paraplegic gait performance. Prosthet Orthot Int1997; 21: 52–61
11.
JebsenR HTaylorNTrieschnannR BTrotterM HHowardL A. An objective and standardized test of hand function. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1969; 50: 311–319
12.
JeffersonR JWhittleM W. Performance of three walking orthoses for die paralysed: a case study gait analysis. Prosthet Orthot Int1990; 14: 103–110
13.
KarcnikTKrauABajdT. Stability and energy criteria in healthy and paraplegic subjects gait. Proceedings of the 5th Vienna International Workshop on Functional Electrostimulation. Austrian Society for Artificial Organs, Vienna1995; 87–90
14.
KunkelC FScreminA MEisenbergBGarciaJ FRobertsSMartinezS. Effects of “standing” on spasticity, contracture and osteoporosis in paralyzed man. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1993; 74: 73–78
15.
MayagorriaR EAndrewsB J. Stability in FES and orthoses assisted standing. Proceedings 3rd Vienna International Workshop on Functional Electrostimulation. Austrian Society for Artificial Organs, Vienna1989; 85–88
16.
MessengerNRithauaS VBowkerPOgilvieC. Effects of ambulation on the blood flow in paralyzed limbs. J Homed Eng1989; 11: 249–252
17.
MotlochW. Principles of orthotic management for child and adult paraplegia and clinical experience with the Isocentric RGO. Proceedings of 7th World Congress of the International Society in Prosthetics and Orthotics, Chicago, 1992. ISPO, Alexandria, VA June 28 – July 3, 1992; 28
18.
MoynahanMChjzbckH J. Characterization of paraplegic disturbance response during FNS standing. IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng1993; 1: 43–48
19.
NeneA VMajorR E. Dynamics of reciprocal gait of adult paraplegics using the Para Walker (Hip Guidance Orthosis). Prosthet Orthot Int1987; 11: 124–127
OgilvieCBowkerPRowleyD I. The physiological benefits of paraplegic orthotically aided walking. Paraplegia1993; 31: 111–115
22.
RoseG K. The principles and practice of hip guidance articulations. Prosthet Orthot Int1979; 3: 37–43
23.
SlobounovSNewellK M. Postural dynamics as a function of skill level and task constraints. Gait Posture1994; 2: 85–93
24.
StallardJMajorR EPatrickJ H. A review of the fundamental design problems of providing ambulation for paraplegic patients. Paraplegia1989; 27: 70–75
25.
StallardJMajorR E. The case for lateral stiffness in walking orthoses for paraplegic patients. /. Eng Med1993; 207H: 1–6
26.
StallardJMajorR E. The influence of orthosis stiffness on paraplegic ambulation and its implications for functional electrical stimulation (FES) walking systems. Prosthet Orthot Int1995; 19: 108–114
27.
TrioloR JRejlleyB WBFreedmanWBetzR R. Development and standardization of a clinical evaluation of standing function: the functional standing test. IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng1993; 1: 18–25
28.
WhittleM WCochraneG M. A comparative evaluation of the Hip Guidance Orthosis (HGO) and the Reciprocating Gait Orthosis (RGO). Health Equipment Information, No. 192. NHS Procurement Directotate, London1989
29.
WhittleM WCochraneG MChaseA PCoppingA VJeffersonR JStaplesD JFennP TThomasD C. A comparative trial of two walking systems for paralysed people. Paraplegia1991; 29: 97–102
30.
WinchesterP KCarolloJ JParekhR NLutzL MAstonJWJR. A comparison of paraplegic gait performance using two types of reciprocating gait orthoses. Prosthet Orthot Int1993; 17: 101–106
