Suture-Button versus Screw Fixation in a Syndesmosis Rupture Model: A Biomechanical Comparison

Abstract

Background:

Flexible suture-button devices are used to stabilize the distal tibiofibular joint after syndesmotic rupture, but little is known about how they affect fibular motion during cyclic physiological loading. This study examined how much fibular motion occurs during cyclic loading of ankles repaired with suture-buttons or screws relative to one with intact ligaments.

Materials and Methods:

Ten pairs of cadaveric legs with intact ligaments were tested in axial compression (750 N), external rotational torque (7.5 Nm), and a combination thereof. Fibular rotation and translation in the sagittal and frontal planes were measured with linear variable displacement transducers. Then we sectioned the anterior tibiofibular, posterior tibiofibular, deltoid, and interosseous ligaments. Ankles were repaired with suture-buttons or a 3.5-mm screw through four-cortices. The ankles were tested for 10,000 cycles using the same loading protocol. Surviving ankles were brought to failure by increasing external rotation (1 degree/sec). Data from the linear variable differential transducers were used to calculate fibular motion at 100, 1,000, 5,000, and 10,000 cycles.

Results:

There was no significant difference in the effect of the suture-button or screw for translation in the sagittal or coronal plane or for rotation about the fibular axis. The screw repair had a significantly greater (p = 0.02) failure torque (median, 26.5 Nm; inner quartile range, 25.7 to 35.2 Nm) than did the suture-button repair (median, 23.6 Nm; inner quartile range, 16.5 to 25.6 Nm).

Conclusion:

The fibular motion that occurs during cyclic loading appears to be similar for the suture-button and syndesmotic screw. Motion in both constructs was similar, but neither restored native ankle motion.

Clinical Relevance:

It appears the suture-button behaves similarly to the syndesmotic screw in the syndesmotic rupture injury model tested. Clinical trials are needed to determine how the device performs in vivo.

Keywords

Ankle Syndesmosis Tibiofibular Suture-Button Flexible

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bartonicek

: Anatomy of the tibiofibular syndesmosis and its clinical relevance. Surg. Radiol. Anat. 25(5–6):379–386, 2003. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1007/s00276-003-0156-4.

Beumer

Campo

Niesing

: Screw fixation of the syndesmosis: a cadaver model comparing stainless steel and titanium screws and three and four cortical fixation. Injury 36(1):60–64, 2005. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1016/j.injury.2004.05.024.

Beumer

Valstar

Garling

: Effects of ligament sectioning on the kinematics of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis. A radiostereometric study of 10 cadaveric specimens based on presumed trauma mechanisms with suggestions for treatment Acta Orthop. 77(3):531–540, 2006. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1080/17453670610012557.

Beumer

Valstar

Garling

: Kinematics before and after reconstruction of the anterior syndesmosis of the ankle. A prospective radiostereometric and clinical study in 5 patients Acta Orthop. 76(5):713–720, 2005.

Beumer

Valstar

Garling

: Kinematics of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis. Radiostereometry in 11 normal ankles Acta Orthop. Scand. 74(3):337–343, 2003. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1080/00016470310014283.

Candal-Couto

Burrow

Bromage

Briggs

: Instability of the tibio-fibular syndesmosis: have we been pulling in the wrong direction Injury 35(8):814–818, 2004. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1016/j.injury.2003.10.013.

Chissell

Jones

: The influence of a diastasis screw on the outcome of Weber type-C ankle fractures. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 77(3):435–438, 1995.

Cottom

Hyer

Philbin

Berlet

: Treatment of syndesmotic disruptions with the Arthrex Tightrope: a report of 25 cases. Foot Ankle Int. 29(8):773–780, 2008. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.3113/FAI.2008.0773.

Forsythe

Freedman

Stover

Patwardhan

: Comparison of a novel FiberWire-Button construct versus metallic screw fixation in a syndesmotic injury model. Foot Ankle Int. 29(1):49–54, 2008. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.3113/FAI.2008.0049.

10.

Marqueen

Owen

Nicandri

Wayne

Carr

: Comparison of the syndesmotic staple to the transsyndesmotic screw: a biomechanical study. Foot Ankle Int. 26(3):224–230, 2005.

11.

Miller

Weinhold

Dahners

: Comparison of tricortical screw fixation versus a modified suture construct for fixation of ankle syndesmosis injury: a biomechanical study. J. Orthop. Trauma 13(1):39–42, 1999. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1097/00005131-199901000-00009.

12.

Shoemaker

Markolf

: In vivo rotatory knee stability. Ligamentous and muscular contributions J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 64(2):208–216, 1982.

13.

Taylor

Tenuta

Uhorchak

Arciero

: Aggressive surgical treatment and early return to sports in athletes with grade III syndesmosis sprains. Am. J. Sports Med. 35(11):1833–1838, 2007. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1177/0363546507304666.

14.

Teramoto

Kura

Uchiyama

Suzuki

Yamashita

: Three-dimensional analysis of ankle instability after tibiofibular syndesmosis injuries. A biomechanical experimental study Am. J. Sports Med, 36(2):348–352, 2008. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1177/0363546507308235.

15.

Thornes

Walsh

Hislop

Murray

O'Brien

: Suture-endobutton fixation of ankle tibio-fibular diastasis: a cadaver study. Foot Ankle Int, 24(2):142–146, 2003.

16.

Walsh

Frank

Shrive

Hart

: Knee immobilization inhibits biomechanical maturation of the rabbit medial collateral ligament. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 297:253–261, 1993.

17.

Xenos

Hopkinson

Mulligan

Olson

Popovic

: The tibiofibular syndesmosis. Evaluation of the ligamentous structures, methods of fixation, and radiographic assessment J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 77(6):847–856, 1995.