Deep Posterior Compartment Strength and Foot Kinematics in Subjects With Stage II Posterior Tibial Tendon Dysfunction

Abstract

Background: Tibialis posterior muscle weakness has been documented in subjects with Stage II posterior tibial tendon dysfunction (PTTD) but the effect of weakness on foot structure remains unclear. The association between strength and flatfoot kinematics may guide treatment such as the use of strengthening programs targeting the tibialis posterior muscle. Materials and Methods: Thirty Stage II PTTD subjects (age; 58.1 ± 10.5 years, BMI 30.6 ± 5.4) and 15 matched controls (age; 56.5 ± 7.7 years, BMI 30.6 ± 3.6) volunteered for this study. Deep Posterior Compartment strength was measured from both legs of each subject and the strength ratio was used to compare each subject's involved side to their uninvolved side. A 20% deficit was defined, a priori, to define two groups of subjects with PTTD. The strength ratio for each group averaged; 1.06 ± 0.1 (range 0.87 to 1.36) for controls, 1.06 ± 0.1 (range, 0.89 to 1.25), for the PTTD strong group, and 0.64 ± 0.2 (range 0.42 to 0.76) for the PTTD weak group. Across four phases of stance, kinematic measures of flatfoot were compared between the three groups using a two-way mixed effect ANOVA model repeated for each kinematic variable. Results: Subjects with PTTD regardless of group demonstrated significantly greater hind-foot eversion compared to controls. Subjects with PTTD who were weak demonstrated greater hindfoot eversion compared to subjects with PTTD who were strong. For forefoot abduction and MLA angles the differences between groups depended on the phase of stance with significant differences between each group observed at the pre-swing phase of stance. Conclusion: Strength was associated with the degree of flatfoot deformity observed during walking, however, flatfoot deformity may also occur without strength deficits. Clinical Relevance: Strengthening programs may only partially correct flatfoot kinematics while other clinical interventions such as bracing or surgery may also be indicated.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

1. Alvarez

Marini

Schmitt

Saltzman

: Stage I and II Posterior Tibial Tendon Dysfunction Treated by a Structured Nonoperative Management Protocol: An Orthosis and Exercise Program. Foot Ankle Int 26(9):671–4. 2006, 27 2–8

2. Arai

Ringleb

Zhao

: The effect of flatfoot deformity and tendon loading on the work of friction measured in the posterior tibial tendon. Clinical Biomechanics. 22:592–598, 2007. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2007.01.011

3. Bluman

Title

Myerson

: Posterior Tibial Tendon Rupture: A Refined Classification System. Foot and ankle clinics. 12:233, 2007. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1016/j.fcl.2007.03.003

4. Browning

Baker

Herron

Kram

: Effects of obesity and sex on the energetic cost and preferred speed of walking. J. Appl. Physiol. 100:390–398, 2006. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1152/japplphysiol.00767.2005

5. Cole

Nigg

Ronsky

Yeadon

: Application of the joint coordinate system to three-dimensional joint attitude and movement representation: a standardization proposal. J. Biomech. Eng. 115:344–349, 1993. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1115/1.2895496

6. Deland

de Asla

Sung

Ernberg

Potter

: Posterior tibial tendon insufficiency: which ligaments are involved. Foot Ankle Int. 26:427–435, 2005.

7. Diamond

Mueller

Delitto

Sinacore

: Reliability of a diabetic foot evaluation.[erratum appears in Phys Ther 1989 Nov;69(11):994]. Phys. Ther. 69:797–802, 1989.

8. Dyal

Feder

Deland

Thompson

: Pes planus in patients with posterior tibial tendon insufficiency: asymptomatic versus symptomatic foot. Foot Ankle Int. 18:85–88, 1997.

9. Faber

FWM

Kleinrensink

Buyruk

: Doppler imaging of vibrations as a tool for quantifying first tarsometatarsal joint stiffness. Clinical Biomechanics. 15(10):761–5 (21 ref), 2001.

10.

10. Flemister

Neville

Houck

: The relationship between ankle, hindfoot, and forefoot position and posterior tibial muscle excursion. Foot Ankle Int. 28:448–455, 2007. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.3113/FAI.2007.0448

11.

11. Friederich

Brand

: Muscle fiber architecture in the human lower limb. J. Biomech. 23:91–95, 1990. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1016/0021-9290(90)90373-B

12.

12. Fukunaga

Roy

Shellock

: Physiological cross-sectional area of human leg muscles based on magnetic resonance imaging. J. Orthop. Res. 10:928–934, 1992. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1002/jor.1100100623

13.

13. Houck

Nomides

Neville

Flemister

: The effect of Stage II posterior tibial tendon dysfunction on deep compartment muscle strength: a new strength test. Foot Ankle Int. 29:895–902, 2008. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.3113/FAI.2008.0895

14.

14. Imhauser

Siegler

Abidi

Frankel

: The effect of posterior tibialis tendon dysfunction on the plantar pressure characteristics and the kinematics of the arch and the hindfoot. Clinical Biomechanics. 19:161–169, 2004. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2003.10.007

15.

15. Jennings

Christensen

: The effects of sectioning the spring ligament on rearfoot stability and posterior tibial tendon efficiency. J. Foot Ankle Surg. 47:219–224, 2008. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1053/j.jfas.2008.02.002

16.

16. Johnson

Strom

: Tibialis posterior tendon dysfunction. Clin. Orthop. 196–206, 1989.

17.

17. Kitaoka

Luo

: Effect of the posterior tibial tendon on the arch of the foot during simulated weightbearing: biomechanical analysis. Foot Ankle Int. 18:43–46, 1997.

18.

18. Lee

Vanore

Thomas

: Diagnosis and treatment of adult flatfoot. J. Foot Ankle Surg. 44:78–113, 2005. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1053/j.jfas.2004.12.001

19.

19. Maletsky

Sun

Morton

: Accuracy of an optical active-marker system to track the relative motion of rigid bodies. J. Biomech. 40:682–685, 2007. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2006.01.017

20.

20. Mann

Thompson

: Rupture of the posterior tibial tendon causing flat foot. Surgical treatment. Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery – American Volume. 67:556–561, 1985.

21.

21. Ness

Long

Marks

Harris

: Foot and Ankle Kinematics in Subjects with Posterior Tibial Tendon Dysfunction. Gait Posture. 27:331–339, 2008. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2007.04.014

22.

22. Niki

Ching

Kiser

Sangeorzan

: The effect of posterior tibial tendon dysfunction on hindfoot kinematics. Foot Ankle Int. 22:292–300, 2001.

23.

23. Otis

Gage

: Function of the posterior tibial tendon muscle. Foot & Ankle Clinics. 6:1–14, 2001. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1016/S1083-7515(03)00071-8

24.

24. Pierrynowski

Smith

Mlynarczyk

: Proficiency of foot care specialists to place the rearfoot at subtalar neutral. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 86:217–223, 1996.

25.

25. Powell

Milner

: A comparison of Clinical Meausrements of Arch Structure in Recreational Athletes. Preceedings 30th Annual Meeting – American Society of Biomechanics. 2006.

26.

26. Ringleb

Kavros

Kotajarvi

: Changes in gait associated with acute Stage II posterior tibial tendon dysfunction. Gait Posture. 25:555–564, 2007. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2006.06.008

27.

27. Rosenfeld

Dick

Saxby

: The response of the flexor digitorum longus and posterior tibial muscles to tendon transfer and calcaneal osteotomy for Stage II posterior tibial tendon dysfunction. Foot Ankle Int. 26:671–674, 2005.

28.

28. Scott

Menz

Newcombe

: Age-related differences in foot structure and function. Gait Posture. 26:68–75, 2007. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2006.07.009

29.

29. States

Pappas

: Precision and repeatability of the Optotrak 3020 motion measurement system. J. Med. Eng. Technol. 30:11–16, 2006. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1080/03091900512331304556

30.

30. Tome

Houck

Nawoczenski

: Reliability of determining an anatomical zero and its effect on dynamic foot motion. Gait Posture. 20:S1–S59, 2004.

31.

31. Tome

Nawoczenski

Flemister

Houck

: Comparison of foot kinematics between subjects with posterior tibialis tendon dysfunction and healthy controls. J. Orthop. Sports Phys. Ther. 36:635–644, 2006.

32.

32. Torburn

Perry

Gronley

: Assessment of rearfoot motion: passive positioning, one-legged standing, gait. Foot Ankle Int. 19:688–693, 1998.

33.

33. Uchiyama

Kitaoka

Fujii

: Gliding resistance of the posterior tibial tendon. Foot Ankle Int. 27:723–727, 2006.

34.

34. Umberger

Nawoczenski

Baumhauer

: Reliability and validity of first metatarsophalangeal joint orientation measured with an electromagnetic tracking device. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 14:74–76, 1999. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1016/S0268-0033(98)00052-7

35.

35. Valderrabano

Hintermann

Wischer

Fuhr

Dick

: Recovery of the posterior tibial muscle after late reconstruction following tendon rupture. Foot Ankle Int 26(9):671–4. 25:85–95, 2004.

36.

36. Wacker

Calder

Engstrom

Saxby

: MR morphometry of posterior tibialis muscle in adult acquired flat foot. Foot Ankle Int. 24:354–357, 2003.