Is it Necessary to Re-Fuse a Non-Union of a Hallux Metatarsophalangeal Joint Arthrodesis?

Abstract

Background: The standard treatment for a non-union of the hallux metatarsophalangeal joint fusion has been to revise the fusion. Revision fusion is technically more demanding, often involving bone grafting, more substantial fixation and prolonged period of immobilization postoperatively. We present data to suggest that removal of hardware and debridement alone is an alternative treatment option. Materials and Methods: A case note review identified patients with a symptomatic non-union after hallux metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ) fusion. It is our practice to offer these patients revision fusion or removal of hardware and debridement. For the seven patients that chose hardware removal and were left with a pseudarthrosis, a matched control group was selected from patients who had had successful fusions. Three outcome scores were used. Hallux valgus and dorsiflexion angles were recorded. Results: One hundred thirty-nine hallux MTPJ arthrodeses were carried out. Fourteen non-unions were identified. The rate of nonunion in males and following previous hallux MTPJ surgery was 19% and 24%, respectively. In females undergoing a primary MTPJ fusion, the rate was 2.4%. Twelve non-union patients were reviewed at 27 months (mean). Eleven patients had elected to undergo removal of hardware and debridement. Four patients with pseudarthrosis were unhappy with the results and proceeded to either revision fusion or MTPJ replacement. Seven non-union patients, who had removal of hardware alone, had outcome scores marginally worse compared to those with successful fusions. Conclusion: Removal of hardware alone is a reasonable option to offer as a relatively minor procedure following a failed arthrodesis of the first MTPJ. This must be accepted on the proviso that in this study four out of 11 (36%) patients proceeded to a revision first MTPJ fusion or first MTPJ replacement. We also found that the rate of non-union in primary first MTPJ fusion was significantly higher in males and those patients who had undergone previous surgery.

Level of Evidence: III, Retrospective Comparative Series

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

1. Baumhauer

J.F.

DiGiovanni

B.F.

: Salvage of first metatarsophalangeal joint arthroplasty complications. Foot Ankle Clin. 8: 37–48, 2003. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1016/S1083-7515(02)00129-8

2. Bennett

G.L.

Kay

D.B.

Sabatta

: First Metatarsophalangeal Joint Arthrodesis: An Evaluation of Hardware Failure. Foot Ankle Int. 26: 593–596, 2005

3. Brodsky

J.W.

Ptaszek

A.J.

Morris

S.G.

: Salvage first MTP arthrodesis utilising ICBG: clinical evaluation and outcome. Foot Ankle Int. 21: 290–296, 2000

4. Budiman-Mak

Conrad

K.J.

Roach

K.E.

: The foot function index: a measure of foot pain and disability. J Clin Epidemiol: 44: 561–570, 1991. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1016/0895-4356(91)90220-4

5. Coughlin

M.J.

Mann

R.A.

: Arthrodesis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint as salvage for the failed Keller procedure. J Bone Joint Surg [Am]. 69-A: 68–75, 1987

6. DeOrio

J.K.

: Technique Tip: Arthrodesis of the first metatarsopha-langeal joint—prevention of excessive dorsiflexion. Foot Ankle Int. 28: 746–7, 2007. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.3113/FAI.2007.0746

7. Fitzgerald

J.A.W.

: A review of the long term results of arthrodesis of the first metatarso-phalangeal joint. J Bone Joint Surg [Br]. 51: 488–493, 1969

8. Grimes

J.S.

Coughlin

M.J.

: First metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis as a treatment for failed hallux valgus surgery. Foot Ankle Int. 27: 887–893, 2006

9. Hyer

C.F.

Glover

J.P.

Berlet

G.C.

: Cost comparison of crossed screw versus dorsal plate construct for first metatarsophanlangeal joint arthrodesis. Foot and Ankle Surgery. 47: 13–8, 2008. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1053/j.jfas.2007.08.016

10.

10. Jarde

Laya

Olory

: Arthrodesis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint using convex and concave drills. A report on 50 cases. Acta Orthop Belg. 71: 76–82, 2005

11.

11. Kitaoka

H.B.

Alexander

I.J.

Adelaar

R.S.

: Clinical rating systems for the ankle-hindfoot, midfoot, hallux, and lesser toes. Foot Ankle Int. 15: 349–353, 1994

12.

12. Marks

R.M.

: Arthrodesis of the First Metatarsophalangeal Joint. AAOS Instructional Course Lectures. 54: 263–268, 2005

13.

13. Myerson

M.S.

Miller

S.D.

Henderson

M.R.

: Staged arthrodesis for salvage of the septic hallux metatarsophalangeal joint. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 307: 174–81, 1994

14.

14. Raikin

S.M.

Ahmad

Pour

A.E.

: Comparison of arthrodesis and metallic hemiarthroplasty of the hallux metatarsophanlangeal joint. J Bone Joint Surg [Am]. 89-A: 1979–85, 2007. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.2106/JBJS.F.01385

15.

15. Richter

Zech

Geerling

: A new foot and ankle outcome score: Questionnaire based, subjective, Visual-Analogue-Scale, validated and computerized. Foot and Ankle Surgery. 12: 191–199, 2006. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1016/j.fas.2006.04.001

16.

16. Schneider

Kahn

: Poor agreement between prospective and retrospective assessment of hallux surgery using the AOFAS hallux scale. Foot Ankle Int. 26: 1062–6, 2005

17.

17. Vienne

Sukthankar

Favre

: Metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis after failed Keller-Brandes procedure. Foot Ankle Int. 27: 894–901, 2006