Ankle and Foot Contributions to Extreme Plantar- and Dorsiflexion in Female Ballet Dancers

Abstract

Background: Female ballet dancers require extreme ankle motion. The objective of this study was to quantify the relative contributions of the ankle and various foot joints to extreme plantarflexion (PF) and dorsiflexion (DF) in female ballet dancers using an X-ray superimposition technique and digital graphics software. Materials and Methods: One asymptomatic ankle was studied in each of seven experienced female ballet dancers. Three lateral weightbearing X-rays were taken of each ballet dancer's ankle: en pointe (maximum PF), in neutral position, and in demi-plié (maximum DF). Using graphics software, a subject's three X-ray images were superimposed and the tall were aligned. On each image the tibia, navicular, intermediate cuneiform, and first metatarsal were marked. Positional differences of a bone's line among the three images demonstrated angular movement of the bone in degrees. The neutral position was the reference from which PF and DF of the bones were calculated. Results: The talocrural joint contributed the most motion of any pair of bones evaluated for both PF and DF, with mean movements of 57.6 ± 5.2 degrees en pointe and 24.6 ± 9.6 degrees in demi-plié. Approximately 70% of total PF and DF were attributable to the talocrural joint, with the remaining 30% coming from motion between adjacent pairs of the studied foot bones. Conclusion: Superimposed X-rays for assessing ankle and foot contributions to the extreme positions required of female ballet dancers offer insight into how these positions are attained that is not available via goniometry. Clinical Relevance: Functional information gained from this study may assist clinicians in assessing ankle and foot pain in these individuals.

Keywords

Ankle Ankle Joint Foot Sports Medicine Dance Ballet

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons: Joint Motion: Method of Measuring and Recording, Chicago, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 1965.

Barnett

Napier

: The axis of rotation at the ankle joint in man: Its influence upon the form of the talus and the mobility of the fibula. J Anat. 86 (1): 1–9, 1952.

Christman

: The normal foot and ankle, In: Christman

Foot and Ankle Radiology. St. Louis, Churchill Livingstone, 2003. 10.1016/B978-0-443-08782-0.50012-2.

Garrick

Requa

: Ballet injuries: An analysis of epidemiology and financial outcome. Am J Sports Med. 21 (4): 586–590, 1993. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1177/036354659302100417.

Hamilton

: Foot and ankle injuries in dancers. Clin Sports Med. 7 (1): 143–173, 1988.

Hamilton

: Posterior ankle pain in dancers. Clin Sports Med. 27 (2): 263–277, 2008. 10.1016/j.csm.2007.12.002. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1016/j.csm.2007.12.002.

Hamilton

Geppert

Thompson

: Pain in the posterior aspect of the ankle in dancers: Differential diagnosis and operative treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 78 (10): 1491–1500, 1996.

Hamilton

Marshall

Molnar

: A profile of the musculoskeletal characteristics of elite professional ballet dancers. Am J Sports Med. 20 (3): 267–273, 1992. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1177/036354659202000306.

Hicks

: The mechanics of the foot. I. The joints. J Anat. 87 (4): 345–357, 1953.

10.

Kitaoka

Luo

K N

: Three-dimensional analysis of normal ankle and foot mobility. Am J Sports Med. 25 (2): 238–242, 1997. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1177/036354659702500218.

11.

Luke

Kinney

D'Hemecourt

et al.: Determinants of injuries in young dancers. Med Probl Perform Art. 17 (3): 105–112, 2002.

12.

Lundberg

: Kinematics of the ankle and foot: In vivo roentgen stereophotogrammetry. Acta Orthop Scand. 60(Suppl 233):1–24, 1989. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.3109/17453678909154185.

13.

Lundberg

Goldie

Kalin

Selvik

: Kinematics of the ankle/foot complex: Plantarflexion and dorsiflexion. Foot Ankle. 9 (4): 194–200, 1989.

14.

Nihal

Rose

Trepman

: Arthroscopic treatment of anterior ankle impingement syndrome in dancers. Foot Ankle Int. 26 (11): 908–912, 2005.

15.

Norkin

White

: Measurement of Joint Motion: A Guide to Goniometry, 4th ed., Philadelphia, F. A. Davis, 2009.

16.

Novella

: Simple techniques for quantifying choreographically essential foot and ankle extents of motion. J Dance Med Sci. 8 (4): 118–122, 2004.

17.

O'Kane

Kadel

: Anterior impingement syndrome in dancers. Curr Rev Musculoskel Med. 1 (1): 12–16, 2008. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1007/s12178-007-9001-4.

18.

Peace

KAL

Hillier

Hulme

Healy

: MRI features of posterior ankle impingement syndrome in ballet dancers: A review of 25 cases. Clin Radiol. 59: 1025–1033, 2004.

19.

Sammarco

Burstein

Frankel

: Biomechanics of the ankle: A kinematic study. Orthop Clin N Am. 4 (1): 75–96, 1973.

20.

Segal

: Ankle function: Measurement and functional bracing of the fractured ankle, In: Bateman

Trott

The Foot and Ankle: A Selection of Papers from the American Orthopaedic Foot Society Meetings. New York, Brian C. Decker Publishers, 1980.

21.

Steinberg

Hershkovitz

Peleg

et al.: Range of joint movement in female dancers and nondancers aged 8 to 16 years. Am J Sports Med. 34 (5): 814–823, 2006. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1177/0363546505281805.

22.

Tochigi

Suh

Amendola

Saltzman

: Ankle alignment on lateral radiographs. Part 2: reliability and validity of measures. Foot Ankle Int. 27 (2): 88–92, 2006.

23.

Weseley

Koval

Kleiger

: Roentgen measurement of ankle flexion – extension motion. Clin Orthop. 65: 167–174, 1969. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1097/00003086-196907000-00020.