Definition of Coordinate System for Three-Dimensional Data Analysis in the Foot and Ankle

Abstract

Background: Three-dimensional data is required to have advanced knowledge of foot and ankle kinematics and morphology. However, studies have been difficult to compare due to a lack of a common coordinate system. Therefore, we present a means to define a coordinate frame in the foot and ankle and its clinical application. Materials and Methods: We carried out ten CT scans in anatomically normal feet and segmented them in a general purpose segmentation program for grey value images. 3D binary formatted stereolithography files were then create and imported to a shape analysis program for biomechanics which was used to define a coordinate frame and carry out morphological analysis of the forefoot. Results: The coordinate frame had axes standard deviations of 2.36 which are comparable to axes variability of other joint coordinate systems. We showed a strong correlation between the lengths of the metatarsals within and between the columns of the foot and also among the lesser metatarsal lengths. Conclusion: We present a reproducible method for construction of a coordinate system for the foot and ankle with low axes variability. Clinical Relevance: To conduct meaningful comparison between multiple subjects the coordinate system must be constant. This system enables such comparison and therefore will aid morphological data collection and improve preoperative planning accuracy.

Level of Evidence: III, Retrospective Case Control Study

Keywords

Coordinate System Foot Ankle Morphology Preoperative Planning

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Beimers

Tuijthof

Maria GJ

Blankevoort

: In vivo range of motion of the subtalar joint using computed tomography. J Biomech. 41 (7): 1390–7, https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.02.020.

Cohen

: 1988. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ.

Dogan

Uslu

Aydinlioglu

Harman

Akpinar

: Morphometric study of the human metatarsals and phalanges. Clin Anat 20: 209–214, 2007. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1002/ca.20348.

Femino

Mueller

: Complications of lesser toe surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 391: 72–88, 2001. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1097/00003086-200110000-00009.

Fitzpatrick

Auger

Lee

: A tibial-based coordinate system for three-dimensional data. Knee 14: 133–137, 2007.

Guyer

Richardson

: Current concepts review: Total ankle arthroplasty. Foot Ankle Int. 29: 256–264, 2008. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.3113/FAI.2008.0256.

Hayes

Tochigi

Saltzman

: Ankle morphometry on 3D-CT images. Iowa Orthop J. 26: 1–4, 2006.

Leardini

: Geometry and mechanics of the human ankle complex and ankle prosthesis design. Clin Biomech. 16: 706–709, 2001. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1016/S0268-0033(01)00022-5.

Maestro

Besse

Ragusa

Berthonnaud

: Forefoot morphotype study and planning method for forefoot osteotomy. Foot Ankle Clin 8: 695–710, 2003. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1016/S1083-7515(03)00148-7.

10.

Perry

Mont

Einhorn

Waller

: The validity of measurements made on standard foot orthoroentgenograms. Foot Ankle 13: 502–507, 1992.

11.

Sammarco

Idusuyi

: Complications after surgery of the hallux. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 391: 59–71, 2001. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1097/00003086-200110000-00008.

12.

Stagni

Leardini

Catani

Cappello

: A new semi-automated measurement technique based on X-ray pictures for ankle morphometry. J Biomech 37: 1113–1118, 2004. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2003.11.017.

13.

Stindel

Udupa

Hirsch

et al.: 3D MR image analysis of the morphology of the rear foot: Application to classification of bones. Comput Med Imaging Graph 23: 75–83, 1999. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1016/S0895-6111(98)00070-6.

14.

Weijers

Kemerink

Van Mameren

et al.: The intermetatarsal and metatarsal declination angles: Geometry as a source of error. Foot Ankle Int. 26: 387–393, 2005.

15.

Weisstein

: The angle between two vectors. In: Wolfram research, 2007.

16.

Siegler

Allard

et al.: ISB recommendation on definitions of joint coordinate system of various joints for the reporting of human joint motion – part I: Ankle, hip, and spine. International Society of Biomechanics. J Biomech. 35: 543–548, 2002. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1016/S0021-9290(01)00222-6.