Finite Element Analysis of Nonanatomic Tenodesis Reconstruction Methods of Combined Anterior Talofibular Ligament and Calcaneofibular Ligament Deficiency

Abstract

Background: Nonanatomic tenodesis reconstruction procedures have been used for lateral ankle ligament reconstruction. However, there has been no comparison of Watson-Jones, Evans, and Chrisman-Snook procedures with respect to biomechanical characteristics such as kinematics, ligaments and grafts stresses using finite element analysis. Methods: A three-dimensional finite element model of the ankle including seven bony structures, cartilage and nine principal ligaments surrounding the ankle joint complex was developed and validated. In addition to the intact model, combined anterior talofibular ligament (ATFL) and calcaneofibular ligament (CFL) deficient, Watson-Jones reconstruction, Evans reconstruction and Chrisman-Snook reconstruction models were simulated. Then, the forces in the ligaments and grafts and the kinematics of the talus and calcaneus were predicted for an inversion or internal torque of 1.7 N•m and an anterior drawer stress of 150 N through the range of ankle motion. Results: All three operations were able to improve the stability of the ankle, but the effectiveness of each procedure was dependent on the direction of the stress applied and the position of the ankle in dorsiflexion-plantarflexion. Conclusion: This study showed that the Watson-Jones procedure has advantages with regard to anterior and rotational stabilities as well as ligaments and grafts stresses in comparison with other nonanatomic tenodesis reconstruction methods. Clinical Relevance: The knowledge of stress inside the ligaments and reconstructed grafts could help to better understand the biomechanical behavior of the reconstructed joint.

Keywords

Ankle Nonanatomic Tenodesis Finite Element Biomechanical

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

1. Becker

Schmidt

Gutcke

Gerngross

: Current status of diagnosis and therapy of chronic collateral ligament instability of the ankle joint: results of a survey of 267 German clinics in 1994. Unfallchirurg. 98:493–499, 1995.

2. Bohnsack

Surie

Kirsch

Wulker

: Biomechanical properties of commonly used autogenous transplants in the surgical treatment of chronic lateral ankle instability. Foot Ankle Int. 23:661–664, 2002.

3. Cass

Morrey

Katoh

Chao

: Ankle instability comparison of primary repair and delayed reconstruction after long-term follow-up study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 110–117, 1985.

4. Chrisman

Snook

: Reconstruction of lateral ligament tears of the ankle. An experimental study and clinical evaluation of seven patients treated by a new modification of the Elmslie procedure J. Bone Joint Surg Am. 51:904–912, 1969.

5. Colville

Marder

Zarins

: Reconstruction of the lateral ankle ligaments. A biomechanical analysis Am J Sports Med. 20:594–600, 1992. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1177/036354659202000518.

6. Corazza

Leardini

O'Connor

Parenti Castelli

: Mechanics of the anterior drawer test at the ankle: the effects of ligament viscoelasticity. J Biomech. 38:2118–2123, 2005. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.09.031.

7. Eberhardt

Lewis

Keer

: Contact of layered elastic spheres as a model of joint contact: effect of tangential load and friction. J Biomech Eng. 113:107–108, 1991. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1115/1.2894076.

8. Evans

: Recurrent instability of the ankle; a method of surgical treatment. Proc R Soc Med. 46:343–344, 1953.

9. Fujii

Kitaoka

Watanabe

Luo

: Comparison of modified Brostrom and Evans procedures in simulated lateral ankle injury. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 38:1025–1031, 2006. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1249/01.mss.0000222827.56982.40.

10.

10. Funk

Hall

Crandall

Pilkey

: Linear and quasi-linear viscoelastic characterization of ankle ligaments. J Biomech Eng. 122:15–22, 2000. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1115/1.429623.

11.

11. Golano

Vega

de Leeuw

: Anatomy of the ankle ligaments: a pictorial essay. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 18:557–569, 2010. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1007/s00167-010-1100-x.

12.

12. Hollis

Blasier

Flahiff

Hofmann

: Biomechanical comparison of reconstruction techniques in simulated lateral ankle ligament injury. Am J Sports Med. 23:678–682, 1995. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1177/036354659502300607.

13.

13. Hoy

Henderson

: Results of Watson-Jones ankle reconstruction for instability. The influence of articular damage J Bone Joint Surg Br. 76:610–613, 1994.

14.

14. Imhauser

Siegler

Udupa

Toy

: Subject-specific models of the hindfoot reveal a relationship between morphology and passive mechanical properties. J Biomech, 41:1341–1349, 2008. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2007.12.017.

15.

15. Karlsson

Bergsten

Lansinger

Peterson

: Lateral instability of the ankle treated by the Evans procedure. A long-term clinical and radiological follow-up J Bone Joint Surg Br. 70:476–480, 1988.

16.

16. Krips

Brandsson

Swensson

van Dijk

Karlsson

: Anatomical reconstruction and Evans tenodesis of the lateral ligaments of the ankle. Clinical and radiological findings after follow-up for 15 to 30 years J Bone Joint Surg Br. 84:232–236, 2002. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1302/0301-620X.84B2.12143.

17.

17. Lee

Lee

Sung

: Biomechanical evaluation against calcaneofibular ligament repair in the Brostrom procedure: a cadaveric study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 16:781–786, 2008. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1007/s00167-008-0557-3.

18.

18. Liu

Baker

: Comparison of lateral ankle ligamentous reconstruction procedures. Am J Sports Med. 22:313–317, 1994. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1177/036354659402200303.

19.

19. Mow

Proctor

Kelly

: Biomechanics of articular cartilage. Basic Biomechanics of the Musculoskeletal System. Malvern PA, 31–57, 1989.

20.

20. Rosenbaum

Becker

Wilke

Claes

: Tenodeses destroy the kinematic coupling of the ankle joint complex. A three-dimensional in vitro analysis of joint movement J Bone Joint Surg Br. 80:162–168, 1998. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1302/0301-620X.80B1.8014.

21.

21. Sarrafian

: Anatomy of the foot and ankle: descriptive, topographic, functional, Philadelphia, Lippincott, 1983.

22.

22. Siegler

Block

Schneck

: The mechanical characteristics of the collateral ligaments of the human ankle joint. Foot Ankle. 8:234–242, 1988.

23.

23. van Strien

van der Linden-van der Zwaag

Kaptein

: Computer assisted versus conventional cemented total knee prostheses alignment accuracy and micromotion of the tibial component. Int Orthop. 33:1255–1261, 2009. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1007/s00264-008-0642-8.

24.

24. Veres

Gordon

Carter

Nixon

: What image information is important in silhouette-based gait recognition? IEEE Conference, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 2: 776–782, 2004.

25.

25. Watson-Jones

: Recurrent forward dislocation of the ankle joint. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 134:519, 1952.

26.

26. Younes

Fowles

Fallaha

Antoun

: Long-term results of surgical reconstruction for chronic lateral instability of the ankle: comparison of Watson-Jones and Evans techniques. J Trauma, 28:1330–1334, 1988. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1097/00005373-198809000-00006.