Cement Spacer as Definitive Management for Postoperative Ankle Infection

Abstract

Background: Postoperative infection can be a devastating complication of ankle replacement and arthrodesis surgery. Management consists of eradication of the infection and either, revision of the initial surgery or some form of salvage procedure. There are instances however when the patient is asymptomatic, medically unfit, or the local tissue is too tenuous to warrant performing additional surgery. We conducted a retrospective review of the outcome of the use of an antibiotic impregnated cement spacer as the definitive procedure in this kind of patient. Methods: There were nine patients with post operative deep ankle infection following surgery who did not undergo subsequent revision surgery. The initial surgeries were either total ankle replacement (TAR) (n = 6) or ankle arthrodesis (n = 3). The indications for the retention of the cement spacer were patients who were asymptomatic following insertion of the cement spacer, did not desire further surgery, or were medically unfit for further surgery. The patients all underwent removal of hardware or implants, debridement, and insertion of an antibiotic impregnated cement spacer. Six weeks of intravenous antibiotics were administered according to culture sensitivity results. Patients were followed up closely for complications (wound dehiscence, spacer migration, bone loss), resolution of infection, functionality, and satisfaction. Results: The average time of cement spacer retention was 20.1 months, ranging from 6 to 62 months. The most common infecting organisms were Staph. Aureus (n = 3) and Staph. Epidermidis (n = 3). One patient had wound complications, possibly due to the proximity of the cement spacer to the anterior skin surface. One patient had a repeat infection at 52 months. The most common co-morbidities were rheumatoid arthritis (n = 3) and diabetes (n = 2). At final followup, seven patients still had a retained cement spacer and two had subsequent below knee amputations (BKA) performed as a result of delayed complications. Review of the X-rays revealed two patients with loosening and migration of the cement spacer. No patients had signs of excessive bone loss. All patients with a retained antibiotic cement spacer were mobile and able to perform basic activities of daily living with minimal discomfort. Conclusion: The long-term use of antibiotic impregnated cement spacers following postoperative ankle infection is a reasonable option in the low demand patient with surgical or medical co-morbidities.

Level of Evidence: IV; Retrospective Case Series

Keywords

Infection Total Ankle Replacement Ankle Arthrodesis Salvage

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

1. Biring

Kostamo

Garbuz

Masri

Duncan

: Two-stage revision arthroplasty of the hip for infection using an interim articulated Prostalac hip spacer: a 10- to 15-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 91(11): 1431–7, 2009. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1302/0301-620X.91B11.22026

2. Blaha

Calhoun

Nelson

: Comparison of the clinical efficacy and tolerance of gentamicin PMMA beads on surgical wire versus combined and systemic therapy for osteomyelitis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993 Oct;(295):8–12.

3. Bucholz

Elson

Heinert

: Antibiotic loaded acrylic cement: current concepts. Clin Orthop. (109):96–108, 1984.

4. Calhoun

Klemm

Anger

Mader

: Use of antibiotic-PMMA beads in the ischemic foot. Orthopedics. 1994 May;17(5):453–7; discussion 458.

5. Cierny

3rd Cook

Mader

: Ankle arthrodesis in the presence of ongoing sepsis. Indications, methods, and results. Orthop Clin North Am. 20(4): 709–21, 1989.

6. Cierny

3rd Cook

Mader

: Ankle arthrodesis in the presence of continuous sepsis. Indications, methods, and results. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 7(3): 545–63, 1990.

7. Durbhakula

Czajka

Fuchs

Uhl

: Spacer endoprosthesis for the treatment of infected total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 19(6): 760–7, 2004. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1016/j.arth.2004.02.037

8. Fitzgerald

Jr Nolan

Ilstrup

: Deep wound sepsis following total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 59(7): 847–55, 1977.

9. Garvin

Hanssen

: Infection after total hip arthroplasty. Past, present, and future. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 77(10): 1576–88, 1995.

10.

10. Haddad

Masri

Campbell

: The PROSTALAC functional spacer in two-stage revision for infected knee replacements. Prosthesis of antibiotic-loaded acrylic cement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 82(6): 807–12, 2000. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1302/0301-620X.82B6.10486

11.

11. Hawkins

Langerman

Anger

Calhoun

: The Ilizarov technique in ankle fusion. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994 Jun;(303):217–25.

12.

12. Hsieh

Huang

Lee

: Two-stage revision hip arthroplasty for infection: comparison between the interim use of antibiotic-loaded cement beads and a spacer prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 86-A(9): 1989–97, 2004.

13.

13. Jacobs

Christensen

Berend

: Static and mobile antibiotic-impregnated cement spacers for the management of prosthetic joint infection. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 17(6): 356–68, 2009.

14.

14. Kotnis

Pasapula

Anwar

Cooke

Sharp

: The management of failed ankle replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 88(8): 1039–47, 2006. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1302/0301-620X.88B8.16768

15.

15. Lipalo

Douglas

: (v) Post-operative infection in total hip arthroplasty Current Orthopaedics June. 20(3): 192–202, 2006.

16.

16. Lonner

Desai

Dicesare

Steiner

Zuckerman

: The reliability of analysis of intraoperative frozen sections for identifying active infection during revision hip or knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 78(10): 1553–8, 1996.

17.

17. Proubasta

Itarte

Lamas

Escriba

: Permanent articulated antibiotic-impregnated cement spacer in septic shoulder arthroplasty: a case report. J Orthop Trauma. 19(9): 666–8, 2005. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1097/01.bot.0000153448.80988.dc

18.

18. Regis

Sandri

Magnan

Bartolozzi

: Six-year follow-up of a preformed spacer for the management of chronically infected total hip arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 130(9): 1111–5, 2010. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1007/s00402-009-0984-8

19.

19. Saltzman

: Salvage of diffuse ankle osteomyelitis by single-stage resection and circumferential frame compression arthrodesis. Iowa Orthop J. 25:47–52, 2005.

20.

20. Scharfenberger

Clark

Lavoie

: Treatment of an infected total hip replacement with the PROSTALAC system. Part 1: Infection resolution. Can J Surg 50:24–28, 2007.

21.

21. Spangehl

Masri

O'Connell

Duncan

: Prospective analysis of preoperative and intraoperative investigations for the diagnosis of infection at the sites of two hundred and two revision total hip arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 81(5): 672–83, 1999.

22.

22. Stasikelis

Calhoun

Ledbetter

Anger

Mader

: Treatment of infected pilon nonunions with small pin fixators. Foot Ankle. 1993 Sep;14(7): 373–9.

23.

23. Stevens

Tetsworth

Calhoun

Mader

: An articulated antibiotic spacer used for infected total knee arthroplasty: a comparative in vitro elution study of Simplex and Palacos bone cements. J Orthop Res. 2005 Jan;23(1): 27–33. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1016/j.orthres.2004.03.003

24.

24. Themistocleous

Zalavras

Stine

Zachos

Itamura

: Prolonged implantation of an antibiotic cement spacer for management of shoulder sepsis in compromised patients. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 16(6): 701–5, 2007. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1016/j.jse.2007.02.118

25.

25. Thompson

Calhoun

: Advanced techniques in foot and ankle reconstruction. Foot Ankle Clin. 2000 Jun;5(2): 417–42.

26.

26. Windsor

Insall

Urs

Miller

Brause

: Two-stage reimplantation for the salvage of total knee arthroplasty complicated by infection. Further follow-up and refinement of indications. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 72(2): 272–8, 1990.

27.

27. Zimmerli

Trampuz

Ochsner

: Prosthetic-joint infections. N Engl J Med. 351(16): 1645–54, 2004. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1056/NEJMra040181