Transit-Focused Development and Light Rail Systems: The Lite Connection

Abstract

Building on a 19-region study of transit-focused development, some directions are suggested for evolving development opportunities associated with the light rail transit systems built and planned in recent decades. Transportation and land use planners continue to propound the concept of transit-focused development that can increase use of transit systems, reduce dependency on automobiles, create desirable living and working environments, and help to meet environmental goals. In their expectations of achieving a substantial amount of transit-focused development, however, planners must recognize the realities of the real estate markets, public policy trends, and the nature of rail lines themselves. Especially along the light rail lines that provide service in many regions, development opportunities will be influenced by changes in the development industry and its primary markets, increasing deference to neighborhood and community groups in decision making regarding development, and the generally lower intensity of use of suburban rail stations compared with many stations along heavy rail lines. Successful development around light rail stations, as with heavy rail systems, will require a timely confluence of market demand with supportive public policies and actions. Unlike experience with heavy rail systems, however, noncentral-business-district stations on light rail lines are more likely to attract relatively small, uncomplicated projects. Transit agencies and local governments will be required to invest more time and energy in nurturing these kinds of projects.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Cervero

Transit-Supportive Development in the United States: Experiences and Prospects. National Transit Access Center, Berkeley, Calif., 1993.

Diamond

H. L.

, and Noonan

P. F.

. Land Use in America: The Report of the Sustainable Use of Land Project. Island Press, Washington, D.C., 1996.

Porter

Transit-Focused Development: A Synthesis of Transit Practice. Prepared for the Transit Cooperative Research Program, TCRP Synthesis 20. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., 1997.

Cervero

, and Landis

. Suburbanization of Jobs and the Journey to Work: A Submarket Analysis of Commuting in the San Francisco Bay Area. Journal of Advanced Transportation, Vol. 23, No. 3, 1992, pp. 275–297.

Douglas

Comparison of Commuting Trends Between Downtown, Suburban Centers, and Suburban Campuses in the Washington Metropolitan Area. Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade & Douglas, Inc., Washington, D.C., 1992.

Ewing

, Haliyur

, and Page

G. W.

. Getting round a Traditional City, a Suburban PUD, and Everything In-Between. Presented at the 73rd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 1994.

Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade & Douglas, Inc., R. Cervero, Howard/Stein-Hudson Associates, Inc., and J. Zupan. Transit and Urban Form, Vols. 1 and 2. Prepared for the Transit Cooperative Research Program, TCRP Project H-1. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., 1996.

Cervero

BART@20: Land Use and Development Impacts. Institute of Urban and Regional Development, University of California, Berkeley, 1995.

Bernick

, and Cervero

. Transit Villages in the 21st Century. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1996.

10.

Black

T. J.

Real Estate Capital Markets. Urban Land, Sept. 1996, pp. 27ff.

11.

Dunphy

R. T.

Marketplace Forecasts: Suburbia. In Land Use in Transition. Urban Land Institute, Washington, D.C., 1993, pp. 62–71.

12.

Schumann

J. W.

, and Tidrick

S. R.

. Status of North American Light Rail Transit Systems: 1995 Update. Proc., 7th National Conference on Light Rail Transit, Vol. 1. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., 1995.