Influence of Bridge Approach,Surface Condition,and Velocity on Impact Factors for Fatigue-Prone Details

Abstract

An impact study on a long-span continuous highway steel girder bridge is described. Crawl and full-speed test data were analyzed to examine the influence of bridge approach, surface condition, and truck velocity on impact factors for fatigue-prone details in both main and secondary bridge members. The measured impact factors for fatigue stress categories A, B, E, and E’ details were compared with values obtained using the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) Standard Specifications formula. For fatigue-prone details, the test results showed that surface roughness, truck velocity, and bridge approach affect the impact factor. Measured impact factors varied with the location of the detail. Also, the study showed that the AASHTO design impact factors were unconservative for details located in the bridge approach or end span.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Deatherage

J. H.

, Sanders

M. D.

, Goodpasture

D. W.

, and Burdette

E. G.

. Controlled Load Tests on a Four Girder Steel Bridge. In Transportation Research Record 1476, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1995, pp. 106–116.

Standard Specifications for Highway Bridges. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C., 1992.

Guide Specifications for Fatigue Evaluation of Existing Steel Bridges. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C., 1990.

Peterson

W. S.

, and Kostem

C. N.

. Dynamic Analysis of Beam-Slab Highway Bridges. In Highway Research Record 428, HRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1973, pp. 57–63.

Ghosn

, Moses

, and Gobieski

. Evaluation of Steel Bridges Using In-Service Testing. In Transportation Research Record 1072, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1986, pp. 71–78.

Moses

, and Verma

. NCHRP Report 301: Load Capacity Evaluation of Existing Bridges. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1987.

Nowak

A. S.

, Hong

Y-K.

, and Hwang

E-S.

. Modeling Live Load and Dynamic Load. In Transportation Research Record 1290, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1991, pp. 110–118.

Schilling

C. G.

Impact Factors for Fatigue Design. Journal of the Structural Division, ASCE, Vol. 108, No. ST9, 1982, pp. 2034–2044.

Nowak

A. S.

, and Nassif

H. H.

. Dynamic Load Spectra for Girder Bridges. In Transportation Research Record 1476, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1995, pp. 69–83.

10.

Yang

Y-B.

, Liao

S-S.

, and Lin

B-H.

. Impact Formulas for Moving Vehicles Moving Over Simple and Continuous Beam. Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 121, No. 11, 1995, pp. 1644–1650.

11.

Cantieni

Dynamic Behavior of Highway Bridges Under the Passage of Heavy Vehicles. EMPA, Dubenclorf, Switzerland, 1992.

12.

Deatherage

J. H.

, Goodpasture

D. W.

, Burdette

E. G.

, and Clarke

S. N.

. Investigation of the Fatigue Behavior of the Holston River Bridge, Final Report. Transportation Center, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, March 14, 1996.

13.

Moses

, Schilling

C. G.

, and Raju

K. S.

. NCHRP Report 299: Fatigue Evaluation Procedure for Steel Bridges. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1987.