Differential Settlements and Inelastic Response in Steel Bridge Beams

Abstract

A proposed method for mitigation of pavement faults at bridge abutments (the “bump at the end of the bridge”) is the use of shallow foundations. Abutments on shallow foundations are expected to settle compatibly with embankments and thus to minimize pavement faults. Allowing bridge abutments to settle may reduce faults, but it creates a demand for tolerance of different settlement in bridge superstructures. Current guidelines for tolerable differential settlement of bridges are empirical only, and the application of elastic analysis of bridge superstructures to determine tolerance of settlement has not produced satisfactory results. Inelastic analysis of steel bridge beams was applied to the computation of tolerable differential settlement. Tests of inelastic rotation capacity of steel beams were reviewed and compared with the results of inelastic analyses. A model of tolerable inelastic rotation capacity in steel beams is proposed.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Briaud

J.-L.

, James

R. W.

, and Hoffman

S. B.

. NCHRP Synthesis 234: Settlement of Bridge Approaches. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1997, 75 pp.

DiMillio

A. F.

Performance of Highway Bridge Abutments Supported by Spread Footings on Compact Fill. Report FHWA RD-81-184, FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1982.

Duncan

J. M.

, and Tan

C. K.

. (1991). NCHRP Report 343: Manuals for the Design of Bridge Foundations, Engineering Manual for Estimating Tolerable Movements of Bridges. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., pp. 219–228.

Moulton

L. K.

, GangaRao

H. V. S.

, and Halvorsen

G. T.

. Tolerable Movement Criteria for Highway Bridges. Final Report FHWA/RD-85/107. West Virginia University, Morgantown, 1985.

Galambos

T. V.

, Leon

R. T.

, French

C. W.

, Barker

, and Dishongh

. NCHRP Report 352: Inelastic Rating Procedures for Steel Beam and Girder Bridges. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1993, 111 pp.

Plastic Design in Steel. ASCE Manual No. 41. New York, 1971.

Schilling

C. G.

Unified Autostress Method. AISC Engineering Journal, Vol. 28, No. 4, 1991, pp. 169–175.

Kemp

A. R.

, and Dekker

N. W.

. Available Rotation Capacity in Steel and Composite Beams. The Structural Engineer, Vol. 69, No. 5, 1991, pp. 88–97.

Daali

M. L.

, and Korol

R. M.

. Local Buckling Rules for Rotation Capacity. AISC Engineering Journal, Vol. 31, No. 2, 1994, pp. 41–47.

10.

Lukey

A. F.

, and Adams

P. F.

. Rotation Capacity of Beams Under Moment Gradient. ASCE ST, Vol. 95, No. 6, 1969.

11.

Kuhlmann

Definition of Flange Slenderness Limits on Basis of Rotation Capacity Values. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, Vol. 14, No. 1, 1989, pp. 21–40.

12.

Climenhaga

J. J.

, and Johnson

R. P.

. Local Buckling in Continuous Composite Beams. The Structural Engineer, Vol. 50, No. 9, 1972, pp. 367–374.

13.

Grubb

M. A.

, and Carskaddan

P. S.

. Autostress Design of Highway Bridges—Initial Moment-Rotation Tests. American Iron and Steel Institute Project 188, 1979.

14.

Kemp

A. R.

Interaction of Plastic Local and Lateral Buckling. ASCE ST, Vol. 111, No. 10, 1985, pp. 2181–2195.

15.

Carskaddan

P. S.

Autostress Design of Highway Bridges—Interior-Support Model Test. American Iron and Steel Institute Project 188, 1980.

16.

Hope-Gill

M. C.

, and Johnson

R. P.

. Tests on Three Three-Span Continuous Composite Beams. Proc., Institute of Civil Engineering, Part 2, 1976, pp. 367–381.