Trapped Vehicle Detection System for Four-Quadrant Gates in High Speed Rail Corridors: Design Methodology and Implementation Issues

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to determine the location of sensors in the track system functioning as checkpoints to provide information to a train on the status of the crossing and provide evasive maneuver time for the train and trapped vehicle. Two train-operating scenarios are evaluated: the first provides no deceleration when a trapped vehicle is detected; the second scenario has the train decelerate at a tolerable deceleration rate to passengers when a trapped vehicle is detected. The findings indicate that there is a trade-off between minimizing the distances to locate the trapped vehicle detection sensors in the track system and potential issues of reliability of vehicle detection and maximization of safety. Recommendations include provision of on-board real-time status information on the crossing(s) in the train with automatic train location and control to continuously provide safe stopping distances in event of a trapped vehicle.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Coleman

III , and Moon

Y. J.

. Design of Gate Delay and Gate Interval Time for Four-Quadrant Gate System at Railroad-Highway Grade Crossings. In Transportation Research Record 1553, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1997, pp. 124–131.

Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD). FHWA, U. S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., 1988.

Emergency Order No. 15, Notice No. 4. Amendment of Emergency Order No. 15. FRA, Federal Register, Vol. 58, No. 177, September 15, 1993, pp. 48415–48420.

New York State’s High Speed Technology Demonstration Proposal. New York State Department of Transportation, Oct. 1993.

Sheffi

, and Mahmassani

. A Model of Driver Behavior at High-Speed Signalized Intersections. Transportation Science, Vol. 15, No. 1, Feb. 1981, pp. 50–61.

Gazis

, Herman

, and Maradudin

. The Problem of the Amber Signal Light in Traffic Flow. Operations Research, Vol. 8, No. 1, 1960, pp. 112–132.

Olson

P. L.

, and Rothery

R. W.

. Deceleration Levels and Clearance Times Associated with the Amber Phase of Traffic Signals. Traffic Engineering, Vol. 42, No. 4, April 1972, pp. 16–19.

Crawford

Driver Judgment and Error During the Amber Period at Traffic Lights. Ergonomics, Vol. 5, 1962, pp. 513–532.

Herman

, et al. Problem of the Amber Signal Light. Traffic Engineering and Control, Vol. 5, 1963, pp. 298–304.

10.

Zeeger

Effectiveness of Green-Extension Systems at High-Speed Intersections. Kentucky Department of Transportation, Research Report 472, May 1977.

11.

Railroad-Highway Grade Crossing Handbook, Second Edition. FHWA-TS-86-215. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation.

12.

Transportation and Traffic Engineering Handbook. ITE, Washington, D.C., 1990.

13.

Envirodyne Engineers, Inc. Chicago-St. Louis High Speed Rail Study Grade Crossing Safety Analysis. Illinois Department of Transportation, Vol. I, Oct. 1993.

14.

Ullman

K. B.

, and Bing

A. J.

. Operations and Safety Considerations in High Speed Passenger/Freight Train Corridors. In Transportation Research Record 1489, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1996, pp. 37–49.