Summarized are problems associated with low-volume road (LVR) passive grade crossings, low-cost innovative devices that have been developed and tested to improve safety, policies, and programs that have been developed and promoted in the United States to enhance safety at LVR grade crossings, particularly at night. On the basis of safety studies and years of experience, conclusions and recommendations are presented to reduce drivers’ risk at the typical passive, rail-highway grade crossing found on LVRs. Stressed are the two keys to reducing risk at LVR, passive grade crossings: provide adequate sight distance and make the crossing and warning devices conspicuous, particularly at night.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1988.
2.
Highway-Rail Crossing Accident/Incident and Inventory Bulletin, No. 19. Federal Railroad Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1997.
3.
Continuous Traffic Count Data and Traffic Characteristics on Kansas Highways; Rural Secondary System Counters. Kansas Department of Transportation, Topeka, KS, 1996.
4.
AbramsB. S.Night Eye vs Day Eye. Institute of Vehicular Safety, Columbus, Ohio, 1989.
5.
AbramsB. S.Buckeye Crossbuck. Proc., 2nd International Symposium on Railroad-Highway Grade Crossing Research and Safety, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, 1992.
6.
AbramsB. S.Equilateral Safety Triangle, Passive Rail-Highway Crossing. Institute for Vehicular Safety, Columbus, Ohio, 1993.
7.
RussellE. R., and AbramsB. S.. Recommended Practice for the Use of Additional Retroreflective Material at Rail-Highway Grade Crossings without Active Warning Devices. Proc., Annual Conference of the Canadian Society of Civil Engineering, Winnipeg, Canada, 1994.
8.
RussellE. R., RysM., and AbramsB. S.. Headlight Illumination and Other Study Results Supporting the Use of Additional Retroreflective Material at Grade Crossings. Presented at 3rd International Symposium on Railroad-Highway Grade Crossing Research and Safety, Knoxville, Tenn., 1994.
9.
RussellE. R.Sr.Discussions of Recent Highway Railroad Passive Grade Crossing Issues. Proc., International Symposium of the American Public Works Association, Seattle, Wash., 1995.
10.
RussellE. R., and RysM.. A Review of Theory, Research and Practice Leading to Recommendations for Greater Use of Retroreflectorization at Highway-Rail Crossings at Grade. Proc., Strategic Highway Research Project and Safety on Two Continents, Prague, Czech Republic, 1995.
11.
RussellE. R., HarwoodD. W., RysM., and RysA.. Development of a Headlight Safety Data Base. Final Report Dot HS 807736, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1991.
12.
KeckM.CDSEN. Vicksburg, Miss.
13.
The Conrail Modified Crossbuck: Background, Need Statement and Proposal for Study. Ohio Department of Transportation, Columbus, 1990.
14.
RussellE. R., and KentW.. Highway-Rail Crossing Safety Demonstrations. Final Report, Contract DTFH53-90-C-00034. Federal Railroad Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1993.
15.
BrichS.Investigation of Retroreflective Sign Material at Passive Railroad Crossings. Virginia Transportation Research Council, Richmond, 1995.
16.
RussellE. R., RysM., and LiuL.. Further Studies of the Use of Retroreflective Material at Highway-Rail Grade Crossings. Proc., 4th International Symposium on Railroad-Highway Grade Crossing Research and Safety. University of Tennessee, Knoxville, 1996.
17.
ZwahlenH. T., and SchnellT.. Advances in Passive Railroad-Highway Grade Crossing Protection: The Photometric Performance of the Buckeye Crossbuck. Presented at 5th International Symposium on Grade Crossing Safety and Research, University of Tennessee Transportation Center, Knoxville, 1998.
18.
ZwahlenH. T., and SchnellT.. Unobtrusive Driver Behavior Measurements at Passive Railroad-Highway Grade Crossings Equipped with New Crossbuck Designs. Presented at 5th International Symposium on Grade Crossing Safety and Research, University of Tennessee Transportation Center, Knoxville, 1998.
19.
Study of Adding Reflective Materials to Crossing Signs and Posts. Final Report Draft 01, Beauchemin-Beaton-Lapointe, Inc., Montreal, Quebec, 1997.
20.
RussellE. R., and LiuL.. Characterization of the Typical, Passive Grade Crossing on Kansas Rural Roads. Proc., 4th International Symposium on Railroad-Highway Grade Crossing Research and Safety, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, 1996.
21.
ContiJ., SheridanT. B., and MullerJ.. Experimental Evaluation of Retroreflective Markings on Rail Cars at Highway-Railroad Grade Crossings. Presented at 5th International Symposium on Grade Crossing Safety and Research, University of Tennessee Transportation Center, Knoxville, 1998.
22.
FordR. E., RichardsS. H., and HungerfordJ. C.. Evaluation of Retroreflective Markings to Increase Rail Car Conspicuity. Volpe National Transportation Center, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1996.
