Tri-Met, the transit provider in Portland, Oregon, is implementing a new computer-aided bus dispatching system that uses a satellite-based global positioning system to track vehicle location. It is expected that the new system will produce improvements in service reliability. Presented is a baseline analysis of service reliability on selected routes, focusing on running times, headways, and on-time performance. Reliability is found to vary according to route characteristics, direction, and time of day.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbkowitzM., and TozziJ.. Research Contributions to Managing Transit Service Reliability. Journal of Advanced Transportation, Vol. 21, 1987, pp. 47–65.
2.
ClotfelterC.The Private Life of Public Economics. Southern Economic Journal, Vol. 59, No. 4, 1993, pp. 579–596.
3.
Operations Control Plan for the Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District of Oregon (Tri-Met). Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District of Oregon, Portland, Ore., 1991.
4.
EberleinX.Real Time Control Strategies in Transit Operations: Models and Analysis. Ph.D. dissertation. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, 1995.
5.
KhattakA., and HickmanM.. Automatic Vehicle Location and Computer Aided Dispatch Systems: Commercial Availability and Deployment in Transit Agencies. Presented at 77th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 1998.
6.
CaseyR., and ColluraJ.. Advanced Public Transportation Systems: Evaluation Guidelines. Report DOT-VNTSC-FTA-93-9. Volpe National Transportation Systems Center, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1994.
7.
HounsellN., and McLeodF.. AVL Implementation Application and Benefits in the UK. Presented at 77th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 1998.
8.
ReedT.Waiting for Public Transit: The Utility of Real-Time Schedule Information. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, 1994.
9.
Multisystems, Inc. Bus Transit Monitoring Manual. UMTA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1984.
10.
Transportation Research Circular 300: Definition of Practices for Bus On-Time Performance: Preliminary Study. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1986.
11.
HundenskiR.A Matter of Time: Cultural Values and the “Problem” of Schedules. Presented at 77th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 1998.
12.
StermanB., and SchoferJ.. Factors Affecting Reliability of Urban Bus Services. Transportation Engineering Journal, Vol. 102, 1976, pp. 147–159.
13.
HendersonG., KwongP., and AdkinsH.. Regularity Indices for Evaluating Transit Performance. Transportation Research Record 1297, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1991, pp. 3–9.
14.
TurnquistM.A Model for Investigating the Effects of Service Frequency and Reliability on Bus Passenger Waiting Times. Transportation Research Record 663, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1978, pp. 70–73.
15.
StrathmanJ., and HopperJ.. Empirical Analysis of Bus Transit On-Time Performance. Transportation Research-A, Vol. 27A, No. 2, 1993, pp. 93–100.
16.
NakanishiY.Bus Performance Indicators: On-Time Performance and Service Regularity. Transportation Research Record 1571, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1997, pp. 3–13.
17.
WhiteH.A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity. Econometrica, Vol. 48, 1980, pp. 817–838.
18.
WilsonN., MacchiR., FellowsR., and DeckoffA.. Improving Service on the MBTA Green Line Through Better Operations Control. Transportation Research Record 1361, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1992, pp. 296–304.
