Automobile dependence is assessed in terms of its direct and indirect costs for 37 global cities. The data show that cities with the most car use, road provision, and urban sprawl have the highest road expenditure, the least transit cost recovery, the most spent on commuting, the highest external costs from road deaths and emissions, and the largest proportion of city wealth going into transportation. As well, the newly developing Asian cities are showing that their automobile-oriented planning is proving to be costly in economic and environmental terms. The costs of automobile dependence in a globally competitive urban environment cannot be simply rationalized away due to apparent or perceived benefits of automobile-based lifestyles.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
NewmanP., and KenworthyJ.. Cities and Automobile Dependence: An International Sourcebook. Gower, Aldershot, England, 1989.
2.
Conservation Law Foundation. The Costs of Transportation. Apogee Research, Boston, Mass., 1994.
3.
LitmanT.Generated Traffic: Implications for Transport Planning. Presentation to World Bank, Victoria Transport Policy Institute, Canada, Jan. 1998.
4.
NewmanP. W. G., and KenworthyJ. R.. Sustainability and Cities: Overcoming Automobile Dependence. Island Press, Washington, D.C., 1998.
5.
RainbowR., and TanH.. Meeting the Demand for Mobility. In Selected Papers. Shell International, London, 1993.
6.
NewmanP. W. G., and 14 authors. Car-Free Copenhagen: Perspectives and Ideas for Reducing Car-Dependence in Copenhagen. Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, Copenhagen, 1997.
7.
KenworthyJ. R., NewmanP. W. G., BarterP., and PoboonC.. Is Increasing Automobile Dependence Inevitable in Booming Economies? Asian Cities in an International Context. IATSS Research, Vol. 19, No. 2, 1995, pp. 58–67.
8.
PoboonC.Anatomy of a Traffic Disaster: Towards Sustainable Solutions to Bangkok’s Transportation’s Problems. Ph.D. dissertation. Murdoch University, Perth, Australia, 1997.
9.
SACTRA. Trunk Roads and the Generation of Traffic. Department of Transport, United Kingdom, Dec.1994.
10.
ZahaviY., and RyanJ. M.. Stability of Travel Components over Time. In Transportation Research Record 750, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1980, pp. 19–26.
11.
HuG., and KenworthyJ.. A Preliminary Study of Land Use and Transportation Patterns in Chinese Cities: Caging the Automobile Dragon. Paper presented to the Asia Research Centre, Murdoch University, Perth, Western Australia, 1996.
12.
BernickM., and CerveroR.. Transit Villages in the 21st Century. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1996–1997.
13.
OECD/EMT. Urban Travel and Sustainable Development. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris, 1996.
14.
McKenzieJ. J., and WalshM. P.. Driving Forces: Motor Vehicle Trends and Their Implications for Global Warming, Energy Strategies, and Transportation Planning. World Resources Institute, Washington, D.C., 1990.
15.
NewmanP. W. G., et al.Human Settlements. In Australian State of the Environment Report. Department of Environment, Sport, and Territories, Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra, 1996.
16.
KenworthyJ., and NewmanP.. Toronto—Paradigm Regained. Australian Planner, Vol. 31, No. 3, 1994, pp. 137–147.
17.
KenworthyJ.Automobile Dependence in Bangkok: An International Comparison with Implications for Planning Policies. World Transport Policy and Practice, Vol. 1, No. 3, 1995, pp. 31–41.
18.
FrostL.The New Urban Frontier: Urbanisation and City Building in Australasia and the American West. University of N.S.W. Press, Sydney, Australia, 1991.
19.
JacobsJ.Cities and the Wealth of Nations. Penguin, Harmondsworth, 1984.
20.
RobertsJ.Where’s Downtown? “It Went Three Years Ago.”Town and Country Planning, May1988, pp. 139–141.
21.
HallP.Reflections Past and Future in Planning Cities. Australian Planner, Vol. 34, No. 2, 1997, pp. 83–89.
22.
GordonP., and RichardsonH.. Are Compact Cities a Desirable Planning Goal?Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol. 63, No. 10, 1997, pp. 95–106.
