Comparison of Piezocone and Laboratory Soil Parameters for Bridge Foundation Design on Clays: Case Study in Massachusetts

Abstract

Results of a case study to demonstrate the use of the piezocone (CPTU) for selection of soil parameters for design of bridge foundations at a clay site in Massachusetts are presented. The test site is the location of several timber-supported bridges that have suffered significant deck and foundation deterioration and need replacement. The soil profile generally consists of 1 to 10 m of fine sand and silt, followed by 45 m of a low-plasticity marine clay that rests on a very dense fine to coarse sand. The site investigation consisted of traditional drilling and sampling techniques, field vane testing, and CPTU profiling. Shelby tube samples were used for laboratory tests, including basic soil characterization and measurements of stress-strain-strength behavior through oedometer and K₀ consolidated direct simple shear tests. Results from laboratory tests showed that some of the tube samples had suffered moderate to high levels of sample disturbance, making them unreliable for laboratory stress-strain-strength testing. A comparison of the laboratory results with the CPTU profiles showed that the CPTU provided excellent information on soil stratigraphy and good comparison with the laboratory-determined stress history and undrained shear strength profiles. The CPTU test program involved less time and expense than the laboratory test program and was not susceptible to sample disturbance effects. This case study suggests that state departments of transportation should consider the CPTU as the instrument of first choice in site characterization programs for design of bridges founded on soft clays.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ladd

C. C.

, Foott

, Ishihara

, Schlosser

, and Poulos

H. G.

Stress Deformation and Strength Characteristics. Proc., 9th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Tokyo, Vol. 2, 1977, pp. 421–494.

Ladd

C. C.

Stability Evaluation During Staged Construction. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, Vol. 117, No. 4, 1991, pp. 540–615.

Terzaghi

, Peck

R. B.

, and Mesri

Soil Mechanics in Engineering Practice, 3rd ed. John Wiley, & Sons, Inc., New York, N.Y., 1996.

Lefebvre

, and Poulin

A New Method of Sampling in Sensitive Clay. Canadian Geotechnical J., Vol. 16, No. 1, 1979, pp. 226–233.

La Rochelle

, Sarrailh

, Tavens

, and Roy

Causes of Sampling Disturbance and Design of a New Sampler for Sensitive Soils. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, Vol. 18, No. 1, 1981, pp. 52–56.

Bjerrum

Problems of Soil Mechanics and Construction on Soft Clays. State-of-the-Art Report, Session 4. Proc., VIII International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Moscow, Vol. 3, 1973.

Ladd

C. C.

, and Foott

New Design Procedure for Stability of Soft Clays. Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE, Vol. 100, No. GT7, 1974, pp. 763–786.

Mesri

Discussion on New Design Procedure for Stability of Soft Clays. Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE, Vol. 101, No. GT4, 1975, pp. 409–412.

Kenney

T. C.

Sea-Level Movements and the Geologic Histories of the Post-Glacial Marine Soils at Boston, Nicolet, Ottawa and Oslo. Geotechnique, Vol. 14, No. 3, 1964, pp. 203–230.

10.

GEI Consultants. Laboratory Test Results—Bridges R-5-9, R-5-7, S-5-3—Revere/Saugus. 95356. 1996.

11.

Bjerrum

, and Landva

Direct Simple-Shear Tests on a Norwegian Quick Clay. Geotechnique, Vol. 16, No. 1, 1966, pp. 1–20.

12.

DeGroot

D. J.

, Ladd

C. C.

, and Germaine

J. T.

Direct Simple Shear Testing of Cohesive Soils. R92-18. Consortium Cooperative Research on Arctic Offshore Engineering and Construction, MIT, Cambridge, Mass., 1992.

13.

Dyvik

, Berre

, Lacasse

, and Raadim

Comparison of Truly Undrained and Constant Volume Direct Simple Shear Tests. Geotechnique, Vol. 37, No. 1, 1987, pp. 3–10.

14.

DeGroot

D. J.

, Germaine

J. T.

, and Gedney

An Automated Electropneumatic Control System for Direct Simple Shear Testing. Geotechnical Testing Journal, Vol. 14, No. 4, 1991, pp. 339–348.

15.

Campanella

R. G.

, Gillespie

, and Robertson

P. K.

Pore Pressure During Cone Penetration Testing. Proc., 2nd European Symposium on Penetration Testing, Amsterdam, Balkema, Rotterdam, 1982, pp. 507–512.

16.

Lunne

, Robertson

P. K.

, and Powell

J. J.

Cone Penetration Testing in Geotechnical Practice. Blackie Academic & Professional, London, 1997.

17.

Tavenas

, and Leroueil

State-of-the-Art on Laboratory and In Situ Stress-Strain-Time Behavior of Soft Clays. Proc., International Symposium on Geotechnical Engineering of Soft Soils, Mexico City, 1987, pp. 1–46.

18.

Mayne

P. W.

Profiling Yield Stresses in Clays by In Situ Tests. In Transportation Research Record 1479, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1995, pp. 43–50.

19.

Leroueil

, Demers

, La Rochelle

, Martel

, and Virely

Practical Use of the Piezocone in Eastern Canada Clays. Proc., International Symposium on Cone Penetration Testing, Linköping, Sweden, Vol. 2, 1995, pp. 515–522.

20.

Chen

B. S.

, and Mayne

P. W.

Profiling the Overconsolidation Ratio of Clays by Piezocone Tests. GIT-CEEGEO-94-1. National Science Foundation, 1994.

21.

Lunne

, Lacasse

, and Rad

N. S.

SPT, CPT, Pressuremeter Testing and Recent Developments on In Situ Testing of Soils. General Report from the 12th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Rio de Janeiro, Vol. 4, Balkema, Rotterdam, 1989, pp. 2,339–2,403.

22.

Wroth

C. P.

Penetration Testing—A More Rigorous Approach to Interpretation. Proc. 1st International Symposium of Penetration Testing, Vol. 1, 1988, pp. 303–311.

23.

Proc., Foundation Deformation Prediction Symposium, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Vol. 1, 1975.

24.

Ladd

C. C.

, and Edgers

Consolidated-Undrained Direct Simple Shear Tests on Saturated Clays. Research Report R72-82. Department of Civil Engineering, MIT, Cambridge, Mass., 1972.

25.

Robertson

P. K.

, and Campanella

R. G.

Interpretation of Cone Penetration Tests. Part II. Clay. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, Vol. 20, No. 4, 1983, pp. 718–733.