PLAN⋄HOV: Case-Based Reasoning Planning Tool for High-Occupancy Vehicle Lane Analysis in a Geographic Information System Environment

Abstract

Historical cases can be used to inform new planning and policy situations. Existing knowledge about high-occupancy vehicle (HOV) lane cases can provide quantitative and qualitative information to support decisions about proposed HOV lanes. Using case-based reasoning (CBR) to formalize the use of historical cases, a computer program called PLAN⋄HOV is demonstrated. CBR complements formal modeling by systematically presenting knowledge to users in situations in which formal models are under development or qualitative information is important. PLAN⋄HOV is a planning tool developed in a geographic information system environment that allows users to understand the potential impacts of proposed HOV lanes on the basis of experiences with similar HOV lanes. All historical HOV lane cases represented in PLAN⋄HOV have HOV lane attributes, associated impacts, and the implementation context. In addition, historical cases contain information about lessons learned, such as inferences about their success or failure, prescriptions, and case quality. The historical cases can be accessed by matching them with the dimensions of the current context (e.g., population and network structure) and the proposed HOV lane actions, such as adding a 2+-person HOV lane that operates during peak periods. The retrieval and display of historical cases can occur with varying levels of matching stringency. Users can examine the matched case(s) for their qualitative content (such as controversies over HOV lanes) and also use them to anticipate the impacts of the proposed lane (e.g., mode shift caused by HOV lanes). The development and use of this case-based planning tool are described.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Leman

, Schiller

, and Pauly

. Rethinking High Occupancy Vehicle Facilities and the Public Interest. Chesapeake Bay Foundation, 1994.

Khattak

, and Kanafani

. Case-Based Reasoning: A Planning Tool for Intelligent Transportation Systems. Transportation Research C, Vol. 4, No. 5, 1996.

Khattak

, and Kanafani

. PLANiTS: Structuring and Supporting the ITS Planning Process. In Transportation Research Record 1588, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1997, pp. 32–40.

Koloder

Case-Based Reasoning. Morgan-Kaufmann Publishers, San Mateo, Calif., 1993.

Leake

Case-Based Reasoning: Experiences, Lessons, & Future Directions. AAAI Press, Menlo Park, Calif., and MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1996.

Capus

, and Tourigny

. Road Safety Analysis: A Case-Based Reasoning Approach. Presented at 77th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 1998.

Hickman

Comparable Systems Analysis of San Francisco’s Bay Area Rapid Transit System: Lessons for Automated Highway Systems. In Transportation Research Record 1516, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1995, pp. 29–37.

Stokes

, and Marucci

. GIS for Transportation: Current Practices, Problems and Prospects. ITE Journal, March 1995.

Petzold

Yielding the Benefits of GIS. American City and County, March 1994.

10.

Bailey

, and Lewis

. Creating a Municipal Geographic Information System for Transportation: Case Study of Newton, Massachusetts. In Transportation Research Record 1364, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1992, pp. 113–121.

11.

Shaw

GIS for Urban Travel Demand Analysis: Requirements and Alternatives. Computers, Environment, and Urban Systems, Vol. 17, Pergamon Press, 1993, pp. 15–29.

12.

Turnbull

High Occupancy Vehicle Project Case Studies: Historical Trends and Project Experiences. Texas Transportation Institute, College Station, Tex., 1991.

13.

Guide for the Design of High Occupancy Vehicle Facilities. AASHTO, Washington D.C., 1992.

14.

Turnbull

, and Hanks

. A Description of High-Occupancy Vehicle Facilities in North America. Texas Transportation Institute, College Station, Tex., 1990.

15.

Schoon

Transportation Systems and Service Policy: A Project-Based Introduction. International Thomas Publishing, New York, 1996, Chapters 2, 5, 6.

16.

Comsis Corporation. Implementing Effective Travel Demand Management Measures: Inventory of Measures and Synthesis of Experience. Section II B: Preferential HOV Treatments. FHWA and FTA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1993.

17.

Fuhs

NCHRP Synthesis of Highway Practice 185: Preferential Lane Treatments for High-Occupancy Vehicles. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1993, 86 pp.

18.

Pint

, Zimmer

, Kern

, and Palek

. Evaluation of Minnesota I-394 High-Occupancy-Vehicle Transportation System. In Transportation Research Record 1494, TRB, National Research Council, Washington D.C., 1995, pp. 59–66.

19.

Poppe

, Hook

, and Howell

. Evaluation of High-Occupancy-Vehicle Lanes in Phoenix, Arizona. In Transportation Research Record 1446, TRB, National Research Council, Washington D.C., 1994, pp. 1–7.

20.

McMullen

, and Gut

. HOV Lane Effectiveness in Controlling Traffic Congestion. Transportation Quarterly, Vol. 46, 1992.

21.

Ulberg

, and Jacobson

. Evaluation of the Cost-Effectiveness of HOV Lanes. In Transportation Research Record 1181, TRB, National Research Council, Washington D.C., 1988, pp. 13–24.

22.

Parody

Predicting Travel Volumes for High-Occupancy-Vehicle Strategies: A Quick Response Approach. In Transportation Research Record 976, TRB, National Research Council, Washington D.C., 1984, pp. 49–60.

23.

Poplaski

, and Demetsky

. Predicting Travel Volumes for HOV Priority Techniques—User’s Guide. VTRC 94-RI3. Virginia Transportation Research Council, 1993.

24.

Sheppard

, Head

, Joshua

, and Mirchandani

. Simulation-Based Methodology for Evaluation of High-Occupancy-Vehicle Facilities. In Transportation Research Record 1554, TRB, National Research Council, Washington D.C., 1996, pp. 90–98.

25.

Gray

, Harvey

, Haven

, and Dillon

. Caltrans Interstate 15 Reversible High-Occupancy Lanes: 1994 Status. In Transportation Research Record 1494, TRB, National Research Council, Washington D.C., 1995, pp. 48–58.