Jointless Bridges and Bridge Deck Joints in Washington State

Abstract

Highlights of a 1997 Quality Improvement Review (QIR) of jointless bridges and bridge deck joints in Washington State are summarized. The purpose of the QIR is to determine, assess, and disseminate the current state of the practice and to share this information with the other FHWA Region 10 states and other FHWA regions. The inspection team included personnel from FHWA, the Oregon Department of Transportation, and the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT). Interviews were conducted with design, construction, inspection, and maintenance personnel. During the QIR, 18 WSDOT bridges were inspected in the field to gauge the performance of jointless bridges and bridge deck joints. Background information on jointless bridges is given, and current practices involving bridge deck joints are presented. The use of jointless bridges eliminates the need for expansion joints and joint maintenance. The QIR found that WSDOT’s semi-integral jointless bridges, with overall lengths of 122 m and skews less than 30 degrees, performed well. Approach slabs are recommended for jointless bridges to minimize the effects of approach settlement. Quality improvement recommendations are presented in the review. WSDOT has developed a new saw-cutting procedure for compression seals, as well as a specification for a second-generation, fatigue-based, modular bridge-expansion joint to improve long-term durability.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bridge Design Manual M23–50, Washington State Department of Transportation, Olympia, Wash., 1994, pp. 8.4.1-1–8.4.1-10.

Burke

M. P.

Jr. , Semi-Integral Bridges: Movements and Forces. In Transportation Research Record 1460, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1994, pp. 1–7.

Burke

M. P.

Jr. , and Gloyd

C. S.

. Emergence of Semi-Integral Bridges. In Transportation Research Record 1594, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1997, pp. 179–186.

Standard Specifications for Highway Bridges, 16th ed. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C., 1996.

AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications for Highway Bridges, 1st ed. AASHTO, Washington, D.C., 1994.

Roeder

C. W.

Fatigue Cracking in Modular Joints. Report No. WA-RD 306.1, Washington State Transportation Center, June 1993.

Roeder

C. W.

Field Measurements of Dynamic Wheel Load on Modular Expansion Joints. Final Research Report, Research Project T9233, Task 46, Washington State Transportation Center, April 1995.

Van Lund

J. A.

Improving the Quality and Durability of Modular Bridge Expansion Joints. In Transportation Research Record 1393, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1993, pp. 9–16.

Van Lund

J. A.

, Kaczinski

M. R.

, and Dexter

R. J.

. Modular Bridge Expansion Joints for Lacey V. Murrow Floating Bridge. In Transportation Research Record 1594, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1997, pp. 163–171.

10.

Dexter

R. J.

, Connor

R. J.

, and Kaczinski

M. R.

. NCHRP Report 402: Fatigue Design of Modular Bridge Expansion Joints. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1997.

11.

Dethlefs

R. A.

Case Study of Thermal Effects on 148th Avenue NE Undercrossing (SR520/36) Bridge. Master’s thesis. Department of Civil Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, 1996.