In-Service Response of an Orthotropic Steel Deck Compared with Design Assumptions

Abstract

To minimize the possibility of fatigue cracking on the new orthotropic deck of the Williamsburg Bridge, laboratory tests with a full-scale prototype panel were conducted. During the study, recommendations for improving fatigue resistance of the welded rib-diaphragm connection detail were made before construction. In addition, load testing and long-term remote monitoring of the orthotropic deck were conducted. The field data suggest that actual truckloads are greater than the standard truck-loads assumed in the AASHTO Load and Resistance Factor Design (LRFD) Specifications. They also suggest that modifications to the fatigue design of deck elements may be required because the maximum stress range exceeds twice the stress range provided by the fatigue truck (i.e., twice the fatigue truck assumed by the AASHTO LRFD Specifications).

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Kaczinski

M. R.

, Stokes

F. E.

, Lugger

, and Fisher

J. W.

. Williamsburg Bridge—Orthotropic Deck Fatigue Test, Phase I Final Report. ATLSS Report 97-04. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, Pa., Dec. 1997.

Tsakopoulos

P. A.

, and Fisher

J. W.

. Williamsburg Bridge Replacement Orthotropic Deck As-Built Full-Scale Fatigue Test, Final Report on Phase 2B. ATLSS Report 99-02. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, Pa., May 1999.

AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, 1st ed. AASHTO, Washington, D.C., 1994.

Fisher

J. W.

, Nussbaumer

, Keating

P. B.

, and Yen

B. T.

. NCHRP Report 354: Resistance of Welded Details Under Variable Amplitude Long-Life Fatigue Loading. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1993.

Steel Structures—Material and Design. Draft. International Standard, International Organization for Standardization, 1994.

Schilling

C. G.

Variable Amplitude Load Fatigue, Task A—Literature Review: Volume I—Traffic Loading and Bridge Response. FHWA-RD-87-059. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, July 1990.

Moses

, Schilling

C. G.

, and Raju

K. S.

. NCHRP Report 299: Fatigue Evaluation Procedures for Steel Bridges. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1987.

Guide Specifications for Fatigue Design of Steel Bridges, 1st ed. AASHTO, Washington, D.C., 1989.

Dexter

R. J.

, Connor

R. J.

, and Kaczinski

M. R.

. NCHRP Report 402: Fatigue Design of Modular Bridge Expansion Joints. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1997.