Using probe vehicles to collect real-time traffic information is considered an efficient method in real-world applications. How to determine the minimum number of probe vehicles required for accurate estimate of link travel time is a question of increasing interest. Although it usually is assumed that link travel time is normally distributed, it is shown, on the basis of simulation results, that sometimes this is not true. A heuristic of determining the minimum number of probe vehicles required is developed to accommodate this situation. In addition, the impact of traffic volume on the required probe vehicle number is discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
LigasJ., BowcottS., BoyceD., NelsonP., SchoferJ., KoppelmanF., and KirsonA.. An Update on ADVANCE. IVHS America Annual Proceedings, Washington, D.C., 1993, pp. 621–625.
2.
TurnerS., and HoldenerD.. Probe Vehicle Sample Sizes for Real-Time Information: The Houston Experience. Proceedings of the Vehicle Navigation and Information Systems Conference, Seattle, Wash., IEEE, 1995, pp. 3–10.
3.
GorysJ., and KeenS.. Measuring Congestion Through the Use of Probe Vehicles in Toronto. Presented at 78th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 1999.
4.
BhandariN., KoppelmanF. S., SchoferJ. L., SethiV., and IvanJ. N.. Arterial Incident Detection Integrating Data from Multiple Sources. In Transportation Research Record 1510, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1995, pp. 60–69.
5.
BalkeK., DudekC. L., and MountainC. E.. Using Probe-Measured Travel Times to Detect Major Freeway Incidents in Houston, Texas. In Transportation Research Record 1554, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1996, pp. 213–220.
6.
BoyceD. E., HicksJ., and SenA.. In-Vehicle Navigation Requirements for Monitoring Link Travel Times in a Dynamic Route Guidance System. Operation Review, Vol. 8, No. 1, Jan.1991, pp. 17–24.
7.
CochranW.Sampling Techniques. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, 1963.
8.
SrinivasanK. K., and JovanisP. P.. Determination of Number of Probe Vehicles Required for Reliable Travel Time Measurement in Urban Network. In Transportation Research Record 1537, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1996, pp. 15–22.
9.
MasonR., GunstR., and HessJ.. Statistical Design and Analysis of Experiments: With Applications to Engineering and Science. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, 1989.
10.
ChienS., and ChowdhuryS.. Freeway Capacity Analysis with Microscopic Simulation Models (CORSIM). Research and Development Division, Turner-Fairbanks Highway Research Center, Fairbanks, Alaska, 1997.
11.
Garmen Associates. Interstate 80 Corridor Transportation Needs Assessment. New Jersey Department of Transportation, Trenton, N.J., 1991.
12.
SallJ., and LehmanA.. JMP Start Statistics. Duxbury Press, Pacific Grove, Calif., 1996.
13.
Special Report 209: Highway Capacity Manual. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1994.
