Maximum Possible Weaving Volume for Effective Operations of Ramp-Weave Areas: Online Estimation

Abstract

Understanding the behavior of weaving flows and estimating the effects of time-variant traffic conditions on the capacity of weaving areas are of critical importance in developing effective operational strategies for freeway management. An online procedure for estimation of the maximum possible weaving volume over time for a given ramp-weave area is presented. The method is based on the findings from weaving behavior analysis, which indicates that under moderate to heavy flow conditions the diverging vehicles, that is, the freeway-to-ramp vehicles, tend to move to the auxiliary lane on entering the weaving area, whereas the ramp-to-freeway vehicles travel a short portion of the auxiliary lane before they merge to the main line. Therefore, the beginning portion of an auxiliary lane in a ramp-weave area is shared by both merging and diverging vehicles, and the length of such a shared area, called the effective weaving zone, varies depending on the length of a given weave section and the amount of weaving flow. Such join-then-split weaving behavior implies that the maximum value of the weaving volume in a ramp-weave area with one auxiliary lane is limited by the maximum through capacity of one lane. The proposed method reflects the weaving behavior described above and determines the maximum possible weaving volume for a given time interval as a function of exit and merge capacities, which are dependent on the traffic conditions downstream of weaving areas. Preliminary test results with 5 min of data from a ramp-weave site indicate that the maximum possible weaving volume is estimated with reasonable accuracy.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Special Report 209: Highway Capacity Manual. 1997 Update. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1998.

Cassidy

M. J.

, and May

A. D.

. Proposed Analytical Technique for Estimating Capacity and Level of Service of Major Freeway Weaving Sections. In Transportation Research Record 1320, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1991, pp. 99–109.

Fazio

, and Rouphail

N. M.

. Freeway Weaving Sections: Comparison and Refinement of Design and Operations Analysis Procedures. In Transportation Research Record 1091, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1986, pp. 101–109.

Van Aerde

, Baker

, and Stewart

. Weaving Capacity Sensitivity Analysis Using INTEGRATION. Presented at 75th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 1996.

Fazio

, and Rouphail

N. M.

. Conflict Simulation in INTRAS: Application to Weaving Area Capacity Analysis. In Transportation Research Record 1287, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1990, pp. 96–107.

Ostrom

, Lannon

, and May

A. D.

. Suggested Procedures for Analyzing Freeway Weaving Sections. In Transportation Research Record 1398, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1993, pp. 42–48.

Fitzpatrick

, and Nowlin

. One-Sided Weaving Operations on One-Way Frontage Roads. In Transportation Research Record 1555, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1996 pp. 42–49.

Fredericksen

V. E.

, and Ogden

M. A.

. Proposed Analytical Technique for Analyzing Type A Weaving Sections on Frontage Roads. In Transportation Research Record 1457, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1994, pp. 50–58.

Kalman

R. E.

A New Approach to Linear Filtering and Prediction Problems. Journal of Basic Engineering, Vol. 82D, 1960, pp. 35–45.

10.

Osama

, Papanikolopoulos

, and Kwon

. Vision-Based Monitoring of Weaving Sections. Presented at ITSC99 Conference, Japan, Oct. 1999.

11.

Nihan

, and Davis

. Recursive Estimation of Origin-Destination Matrices from Input/Output Counts. Transportation Research, Vol. 21B, 1987, pp. 149–163.

12.

Van der Zijpp

N. J.

, and Hamerslag

. Improved Kalman Filtering Approach to Estimate Origin-Destination Matrices for Freeway Corridors. In Transportation Research Record 1443, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1994, pp. 54–64.