The adoption of enterprise-based financial reporting practices in the public transportation infrastructure has the potential to facilitate the use of profitability analysis and, thus, the management of public transportation infrastructure assets. However, a major challenge for successful implementation is the ability to generate in a public setting what the Governmental Accounting Standards Board refers to as “satisfactory” system input values. Because market prices are not generated in these environments, they must be simulated. Two promising approaches for generating such measurements are reviewed: benefit-cost analysis and econometric studies of the productivity impacts of infrastructure investments (on productivity studies). Although the two approaches are subject to several weaknesses that inhibit them from generating satisfactory system input values, ongoing methodological advances in both indicate fair prospects for generating such values in the future. Therefore, a dismissal of enterprise financial reporting practices for public transportation infrastructure may be premature.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
An Analysis of Issues Related to Accounting and Financial Reporting for Capital Assets of Governmental Entities. Discussion Memorandum, Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB), Norwalk, Conn., 1987, p. 58.
2.
Basic Financial Statements—and Management’s Discussion and Analysis—for State and Local Governments. GASB, Norwalk, Conn., 1999.
3.
LemerA. C.Building Public Works Infrastructure Management Systems for Achieving High Return on Public Assets. Public Works Management and Policy, Vol. 3, No. 3, 1999, pp. 255–272.
4.
SonnenbergD. J., and MoirJ.. City of Minneapolis: State of the Public Infrastructure. Department of Public Works and Finance Department, City of Minneapolis, Minn., 1997.
5.
RiordanT., OriaM., and TussJ.. The Bridge From Dreams to Realities: Dayton’s Capital Allocation Process. Government Finance Review, April1987, pp. 7–13.
6.
BairdM. E., and StammerR. E.Jr.Measuring the Performance of State Transportation Agencies: Three Perspectives. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1729, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2000, pp. 26–34.
7.
LockwoodS. C.Transportation Infrastructure Services in the 21st Century. TR News, No. 192, Sept.-Oct.1997, pp. 3–9.
8.
Service Efforts and Accomplishments Reporting. GASB, Norwalk, Conn., 1992.
9.
von MisesL.Human Action: A Treatise on Economics, 4th ed. Fox & Wilkes, San Francisco, Calif., 1996.
10.
McNameeP., DornanD., and ChaitE.. Understanding GASB 34’s Infrastructure Reporting Requirements: A PricewaterhouseCoopers White Paper. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, Washington, D.C., 1999.
11.
NasT. F.Cost-Benefit Analysis: Theory and Application. SAGE Publications, London, 1996.
12.
GramlichE. M.A Guide to Benefit-Cost Analysis, Waveland Press, Inc., Prospect Heights, Ill., 1990.
13.
FreemanM. A.III. The Measurement of Environmental and Resource Values. Resources for the Future, Washington, D.C., 1992.
14.
ScitovskyT.A Note on Welfare Propositions in Economics. Review of Economic Studies, Nov.1941, pp. 77–88.
15.
SamuelsonP. A.Pure Theory of Public Expenditures. Review of Economics and Statistics, Nov.1954, pp. 387–389.
16.
SamuelsonP. A.Diagrammic Exposition of a Theory of Public Expenditures. Review of Economics and Statistics, Nov.1955, 350–356.
17.
SmithK. V.Resource Evaluation at the Crossroads. Resources, Winter1988, pp. 2–6.
18.
GramlichE. M.Infrastructure Investment: A Review Essay. Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 32, 1994, pp. 1176–1196.
19.
MeierK. J.The Limits of Cost-Benefit Analysis. In Decision Making in the Public Sector (NigroL. J., ed.), Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, 1984, pp. 43–63.
20.
FurubotnE., and PejovichS.. Property Rights and Economic Theory: A Survey of Recent Literature. Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 10, Dec, 1972, pp. 1137–1162.
21.
HayekF. A.The Present State of the Debate. In Collectivist Economic Planning (HayekFreidrich A., ed.), George Routledge and Kegan Paul, Ltd., London, 1935, pp. 201–243.
22.
HayekF. A.The Use of Knowledge in Society. In Individualism and Economic Order (HayekF.A., ed.), The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Ill., 1948, pp. 77–91.
23.
HayekF. A.Individualism and Economic Order. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Ill., 1948.
24.
DixitA. K., and PindyckR. S.. Investment Under Uncertainty. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J., 1994.
25.
MorrisonC., and SchwartzE.. State Infrastructure and Productive Performance. The American Economic Review, Dec.1996, pp. 1095–1111.
26.
AschauerD. Is Public Expenditure Productive? Journal of Monetary Economics, Vol. 23, No. 2, 1989, pp. 177–200.
27.
TatomJ. A.Public Capital and Private Sector Performance. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, Vol. 73, No. 3, May–June1991, pp. 3–15.
28.
KessidesK., and IngramG.. Infrastructure Impact on Development: Lessons from WDR 1994. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, Vol. 1, No. 1, March1995, pp. 16–32.
29.
ButtonK.Infrastructure Investment, Endogenous Growth and Economic Convergence. The Annals of Regional Science, Vol. 32, 1998, pp. 145–162.
30.
LallS. V.The Role of Infrastructure in Regional Growth Productivity Impacts and Investment Criteria. Ph.D. dissertation. George Mason University, Fairfax, Va., 1999.
31.
GriffithD. A., AmrheinC. G., and HuriotJ.-M.. Econometric Advances in Spatial Modelling and Methodology: Essays in Honour of Jean Paelinck. Kluwer Academic, Boston, Mass., 1998.
