Incorporation of Reliability into Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design

Abstract

Pavement thickness design traditionally has been based on empiricism. However, mechanistic-empirical (M-E) design procedures are becoming more prevalent, and there is a current effort by AASHTO to establish a nationwide M-E standard design practice. Concurrently, an M-E design procedure for flexible pavements tailored to conditions within Minnesota has been developed and is being implemented. Regardless of the design procedure type, inherent variability associated with the design input parameters will produce variable pavement performance predictions. Consequently, for a complete design procedure, the input variability must be addressed. To account for input variability, reliability analysis was incorporated into the M-E design procedure for Minnesota. Monte Carlo simulation was chosen for reliability analysis and was incorporated into the computer pavement design tool, ROADENT. A sensitivity analysis was conducted by using ROADENT in conjunction with data collected from the Minnesota Road Research Project and the literature. The analysis demonstrated the interactions between the input parameters and showed that traffic weight variability exerts the largest influence on predicted performance variability. The sensitivity analysis also established a minimum number of Monte Carlo cycles for design (5,000) and characterized the predicted pavement performance distribution by an extreme value Type I function. Finally, design comparisons made between ROADENT, the 1993 AASHTO pavement design guide, and the existing Minnesota design methods showed that ROADENT produced comparable designs for rutting performance but was somewhat conservative for fatigue cracking.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Guide for Design of Pavement Structures. AASHTO, Washington, D.C., 1993.

Timm

D. H.

, Birgisson

, and Newcomb

D. E.

Development of Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design in Minnesota. In Transportation Research Record 1629, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1998, pp. 181–188.

Timm

D. H.

, Newcomb

D. E.

, and Birgisson

Mechanistic-Empirical Flexible Pavement Thickness Design, The Minnesota Method. Final Report. Minnesota Department of Transportation, Minneapolis, 199.

Theyse

H. L.

, DeBeer

, and Rust

F. C.

Overview of the South African Mechanistic Pavement Design Analysis Method. In Transportation Research Record 1539, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1996, pp. 6–17.

Monismith

C. L.

Analytically Based Asphalt Pavement Design and Rehabilitation: Theory to Practice, 1962-1992. In Transportation Research Record 1354, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1992, pp. 5–6.

NCHRP Report 1-26: Calibrated Mechanistic Structural Analysis Procedures for Pavements Phase 2. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1992, p. 131.

Kulkarni

R. B.

Rational Approach in Applying Reliability Theory to Pavement Structural Design. In Transportation Research Record 1449, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1994, pp. 13–17.

Harr

M. E.

Reliability Based Design in Civil Engineering, McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York, 1987.

Rosenblueth

Point Estimates for Probability of Moments. Proceedings, National Academy of Science, Vol. 72, No. 10, 1975.

10.

Van Cauwelaert

Distributions de Rosenblueth et fonctions correlées. Symposium on Reliability-Based Design in Civil Engineering, EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland, 1988.

11.

Van Cauwelaert

Use of the ROSENBLUETH Theory for the Determination of the Frequency Distribution of a Function of Random Variables. Proceedings of the CROW Workshop, Ede, Netherlands, 1994.

12.

Eckmann

New Tools for Rational Pavement Design. Proc., 8th International Conference on Asphalt Pavements, Seattle, Wash., 1997, pp. 25–42.

13.

Hart

G. C.

Uncertainty Analysis, Loads and Safety in Structural Engineering. Prentice-Hall, New York, 1982.

14.

Mann

N. R.

, Schafer

R. E.

, and Singpurwalla

N. D.

Methods for Statistical Analysis of Reliability and Life Data. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, 1974.

15.

Timm

D. H.

Incorporation of Reliability in Mechanistic-Empirical Flexible Pavement Thickness Design. M.S. thesis. University of Minnesota, 1997.

16.

Timm

D. H.

, Birgisson

, and Newcomb

D. E.

Variability of Mechanistic-Empirical Flexible Pavement Design Parameters. Fifth International Conference on the Bearing Capacity of Roads and Airfields ( Nordal

R. S.

and Refsdal

, eds.), Trondheim, Norway, 1998, pp. 629–238.

17.

Shah

An Investigation of Overloads on Highway Bridges. M.S. thesis. Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, 1989.

18.

Liu

W. D.

, Cornell

C. A.

, and Imbsen

R. A.

Analysis of Bridge Truck Loads. In Probabilistic Methods in Civil Engineering ( Spanos

P. D.

, ed.). ASCE, 1988, pp. 221–224.

19.

Chia-Pei

J. C.

, and Ching

C.-P.

Truck Load Distribution and Its Impact on Vehicle Weight Regulations in Taiwan. In Transportation Research Record 1501, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1995, pp. 87–94.

20.

Thoft-Christensen

, and Baker

M. J.

Structural Reliability Theory and Its Applications. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1982.

21.

Minnesota Road Design Manual, Design Policy and Criteria. Minnesota Department of Transportation, Minneapolis, 1982.

22.

Ovik

J. M.

Characterizing Seasonal Variations in Pavement Material Properties for Use in a Mechanistic-Empirical Design Procedure. M.S. thesis. University of Minnesota, 1998.