Field Evaluation of a Leading Pedestrian Interval Signal Phase at Three Urban Intersections

Abstract

About 37 percent of pedestrian injury crashes and 20 percent of fatal pedestrian crashes occur at intersections. Many conventional countermeasures include traffic control devices that either increase pedestrian attention to potential vehicle-pedestrian conflicts or encourage drivers to yield to pedestrians. A noteworthy limitation of these warning and prompting messages is their reliance on a voluntary behavioral response. Public education and enforcement campaigns have also generally not produced tangible and long-lasting safety benefits. This research, conducted at three urban intersections, examined the influence of a 3-s leading pedestrian interval (LPI)—a brief and exclusive signal phase dedicated to pedestrian traffic—on pedestrian behavior and conflicts with turning vehicles. The introduction of a 3-s LPI reduced conflicts between pedestrians and turning vehicles and reduced the incidence of pedestrians yielding the right-of-way to turning vehicles.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Traffic Safety Facts 1995. Report HS-808-471. U.S. Department of Transportation, 1996.

Retting

R. A.

A Study of Fatal Crashes Involving Pedestrians and Trucks in Four Cities. Journal of Safety Research, Vol. 24, No. 4, 1993, pp. 195–203.

Stutts

J. C.

, Hunter

W. W.

, and Pein

W. E.

. Pedestrian-Vehicle Crash Types: An Update. In Transportation Research Record 1538, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1996, pp. 68–74.

Quaye

, Leden

, and Hauer

. Pedestrian Accidents and Left-Turning Traffic at Signalized Intersections. AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety, Washington, D.C., 1993.

Snyder

M. B.

, and Knoblauch

R. L.

. Pedestrian Safety: The Identification of Precipitating Factors and Possible Countermeasures. Report FH-11-7312. U.S. Department of Transportation, 1971.

Zegeer

C. V.

Synthesis of Pedestrian Safety Research. Report SA-91-034. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1991.

Retting

R. A.

, Van Houten

, Malenfant

, Van Houten

, and Farmer

C. M.

. Special Signs and Pavement Markings Improve Pedestrian Safety. ITE Journal, Vol. 66, No. 12, 1996, pp. 28–35.

Abdulsattar

H. N.

, Tarawneh

M. S.

, McCoy

P. T.

, and Kachman

S. D.

. Effect on Vehicle-Pedestrian Conflicts of “Turning Traffic Must Yield to Pedestrians” Sign. In Transportation Research Record 1553, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1996, pp. 38–45.

Sterling

C. F.

An Analysis of Pedestrian Reaction to the Flashing WALK Indicator. Traffic Engineering Journal, 1974.

10.

Weiner

E. L.

The Elderly Pedestrian: Response to an Enforcement Campaign. Traffic Safety Research Review, Vol. 12, No. 4, 1968, pp. 100–110.

11.

Britt

J. W.

, Bergman

A. B.

, and Moffat

. Law Enforcement, Pedestrian Safety, and Driver Compliance with Crosswalk Laws: Evaluation of a Four-Year Campaign in Seattle (with Discussion and Closure). In Transportation Research Record 1485, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1995, pp. 160–167.

12.

Abrams

C. M.

, and Smith

S. A.

. Selection of Pedestrian Signal Phasing. In Transportation Research Record 629, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1977, pp. 1–6.

13.

Hannan

T. J.

Solving Pedestrian Conflicts with Special Signal Phasing. ITE Compendium of Technical Papers, 1987, pp. 146–149.

14.

Habib

Pedestrian Safety: The Hazards of Left-Turning Vehicles. ITE Journal, Vol. 50, No. 4, 1980, pp. 33–37.

15.

Hoxie

R. E.

, and Rubenstein

L. Z.

. Are Older Pedestrians Allowed Enough Time to Cross Intersections Safely? Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, Vol. 42, No. 3, 1994, pp. 241–244.

16.

Coffin

, and Morrall

. Walking Speeds of Elderly Pedestrians at Crosswalks. In Transportation Research Record 1487, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1995, pp. 63–67.

17.

Knoblauch

R. L.

, Pietrucha

M. T.

, and Nitzburg

. Field Studies of Pedestrian Walking Speed and Start-Up Time. In Transportation Research Record 1538, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1996, pp. 27–38.