Parametric Study on Behavior of Stress-Laminated Southern Pine Bridge Decks

Abstract

Stress-laminated timber bridge decks have gained popularity in the United States in recent years. As with all wood exposed to the environment, wood for these decks must be treated with preservatives. There has been reluctance to build chromated copper arsenate (CCA)-treated wood bridges because of concerns about dimensional stability. Because no research has been undertaken to investigate the use of CCA-treated southern pine stress-laminated bridge decks, a good resource for economical rural bridges has remained untapped. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the performance of various wood preservatives on stress-laminated southern pine bridge decks. A total of nine decks with seven different preservatives were built and exposed to the environment for more than 2 years. Force levels in prestressing rods and wood moisture contents from each deck were continuously monitored. It was found that the short-term variations in the rod stress levels are less for decks with oil-type preservatives than for decks with CCA preservatives. The long-term performances of decks with both preservative types were found to be similar. The anchorage effect on deck performance was found to be negligible.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

National Bridge Inventory. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1998.

Batchelor

, Van Dalen

, Hachborn

, and Lee

. Structural Characteristics of Transversely Prestressed Laminated Wood Bridge Decks. Report 8305. Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada, 1979.

Ontario Highway Bridge Design Code. Ministry of Transportation and Communications, Downsview, Ontario, Canada, 1983.

Oliva

M. G.

, Dimakis

A. G.

, Ritter

, and Tuomi

T. L.

. Stress-Laminated Wood Bridge Decks; Experimental and Analytical Evaluations. Research Paper FPL-RP-495. Forest Products Laboratory, USDA Forest Service, Madison, Wis., 1990.

Barger

, Gangarao

H. V. S.

, and Raju

. Experimental and Theoretical Evaluation of Stress-Laminated Timber T, Bulb T and Box Systems. Constructed Facilities Center Report No. CFC-93-162. West Virginia University, Morgantown, 1993.

Lopez-Anido

, and Gangarao

H. V. S.

. Systematic Approach Towards the Design of Stressed Timber T and Box Beam Bridges. Constructed Facilities Center Report No. CFC-93-163. West Virginia University, Morgantown, 1995.

Standard Specifications for Highway Bridges, 15th ed. AASHTO, Washington, D.C., 1996.

Wacker

J. P.

, and Ritter

M. A.

. Field Performance of Timber Bridges: 4. Graves Crossing Stress-Laminated Deck Bridge. Research Paper FPL-RP-539. Forest Products Laboratory, USDA Forest Service, Madison, Wis., 1995.

Wacker

J. P.

, Ritter

M. A.

, and Conger

. Field Performance of Timber Bridges: 8. Lynches Woods Park Stress-Laminated Deck Bridge. Research Paper FPL-RP-551. Forest Products Laboratory, USDA Forest Service, Madison, Wis., 1996.

10.

Book of Standards. American Wood Preserver’s Association, Woodstock, Md., 1990.

11.

Ritter

M. A.

Timber Bridges: Design, Construction, Inspection and Maintenance. EM 7700-8. USDA Forest Service, Madison, Wis., 1992.

12.

Design Values for Wood Construction. A Supplement to the 1991 Edition of the National Design Specification. American Forest Products Association, Washington, D.C., 1991.

13.

Steel Manual: Load and Resistance Factor Design, 2nd ed. American Institute of Steel Construction, Chicago, Ill., 1994.

14.

Wood Handbook: Wood as an Engineering Material. Agricultural Handbook 72. Forest Products Laboratory, USDA Forest Service, Washington, D.C., 1987.