Effect of Free Parking on Commuter Mode Choice: Evidence from Travel Diary Data

Abstract

This study assesses the effect of free parking on mode choice and parking demand. A multinomial logit model is developed to evaluate the probabilities that commuters who do and do not receive free parking at work will choose to drive alone, ride in a carpool, or use transit for the trip to work in the central business district (CBD) of Portland, Oregon. The mode choice model predicts that with free parking, 62 percent of commuters will drive alone, 16 percent will commute in carpools, and 22 percent will ride transit; with a daily parking charge of $6, 46 percent will drive alone, 4 percent will ride in carpools, and 50 percent will ride transit. The mode choice model predicts that a daily parking charge of $6 in the Portland CBD would result in 21 fewer cars driven for every 100 commuters. This translates to a daily reduction of 147 vehicle miles traveled (VMT) per 100 commuters and an annual reduction of 39,000 VMT per 100 commuters. These findings are consistent with previous studies on how parking cost affects mode choice. The policy variables that help influence mode choice decisions for commuters are the parking cost and the travel time by transit. The results suggest that raising the cost of parking at work sites and decreasing the transit travel time (by improving service and decreasing headways) will reduce the drive alone mode share. The results provide little support for the contention that land use is a significant factor in mode choice decisions.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Shoup

D. C.

An Opportunity to Reduce Minimum Parking Requirements. Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol. 61, No. 1, 1995, pp. 14–28.

Data Collection in the Portland, Oregon Metropolitan Area. Cambridge Systematics, Oakland, Calif., 1996.

The Pedestrian Environment, Vol. 4A, Making the Land Use, Transportation, Air Quality Connection. 1000 Friends of Oregon, Portland, 1993. http//www.friends.org/resources/lut_reports.html

Willson

R. W.

, and Shoup

. Parking Subsidies and Travel Choice: Assessing the Evidence. Transportation, Vol. 17, 1990, pp. 141–157.

Mildner

, Strathman

J. G.

, and Bianco

M. J.

. Travel and Parking Behavior in the United States. Working Paper. Center for Urban Studies, Portland State University, Oreg., 1998.

Horowitz

J. L.

Modeling Choices of Residential Location and Mode of Travel to Work. In The Geography of Urban Transportation, 2nd ed. ( Hanson

, ed.), The Guilford Press, New York, 1995, pp. 219–239.

Crane

, and Crepeau

. Does Neighborhood Design Influence Travel? A Behavioral Analysis of Travel Diary and GIS Data. Transportation Research, Part D, Vol. 3, No. 4, 1998, pp. 225–238.

Willson

R. W.

Estimating the Travel and Parking Demand Effects of Employer-Paid Parking. Regional Science and Urban Economics, Vol. 22, 1992, pp. 133–145.

Shoup

D. C.

Cashing Out Employer-Paid Parking: A Precedent for Congestion Pricing? In Special Report 242: Curbing Gridlock, Vol. 1, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1994, pp. 152–199.

10.

Shoup

Evaluating the Effects of Cashing Out Employer-Paid Parking: Eight Case Studies. Transport Policy, Vol. 4, No. 4, 1997, pp. 201–216.