We’re Really Asking for It: Using Surveys to Engage the Freight Community

Abstract

Freight transportation concerns and issues have received increasing attention during the 1990s. Various public-sector agencies have attempted to identify locations where improvements are needed to facilitate freight movements. Needed improvements have been determined via modeling, technical data and estimates, reviews of plans and other documents, personal observations, and public input. Various observers think that information from these sources should be combined with more specific information from shippers and motor carriers moving freight. No definitive research has been conducted on how best to survey shippers and motor carriers. To establish the most effective means of obtaining views from the freight community about infrastructure problems on state highways and the supporting road network, the Oregon Department of Transportation sponsored the development of a method to conduct a shipper and carrier survey. Pilot instruments and methods were systematically administered to a stratified, random sample of Oregon freight shippers and motor carriers.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Oregon Department of Transportation. Freight Moves the Oregon Economy. Salem, 1999.

Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Southwest Oregon Freight Movement Study. Oregon Department of Transportation, Salem, 1995.

Department of Policy and Planning and Marketing Research, Port of Portland. Freight Movement Needs Study, Portland, Oreg., 1995.

CH2M Hill, BRW, VZM, Intergraph Corporation, Gene Leverton, and Jeanne Lawson & Associates. Oregon’s Intermodal Management System. Oregon Department of Transportation, Port of Portland, and Portland Metro 1997.

Vaca

Memorandum Regarding Freight Logistics Interviews. Cambridge Systematics, Inc., Oakland, Calif., Sept. 25, 1998.

DKS Associates. Freight Users/Shippers Logistics Interviews, Interstate 5 Corridor: Summary Report. Region 1, Oregon Department of Transportation, Portland, 1999.

Morris

A. G.

, Kornhauser

A. L.

, and Kay

M. J.

Urban Freight Mobility: Collection of Data on Time, Costs, and Barriers Related to Moving Product into the Central Business District. In Transportation Research Record 1613, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1998, pp. 27–32.

Aultman-Hall

, Agent

, and Aldridge

Truck Route Access Evaluation: Final Summary Report. College of Engineering, Kentucky Transportation Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Ky., 1999.

Regan

A. C.

, and Golob

T. F.

Freight Operators’ Perceptions of Congestion Problems and the Application of Advanced Technologies: Results from a 1998 Survey of 1,200 Companies Operating in California. Transportation Journal, Vol. 38, No. 3, 1999, pp. 57–67.

10.

Hensher

D. A.

, and Golob

T. F.

Searching for Policy Priorities in the Formulation of a Freight Transport Strategy: A Canonical Correlation of Analysis of Freight Industry Attitudes. Transportation Research E, Vol. 35, 1999, pp. 241–267.

11.

Southwestern Pennsylvania Regional Planning Commission. Freight Transportation Issues in Southwestern Pennsylvania: A Survey of Manufacturers and Transportation Service Providers. Pittsburgh, Penn., 1996.

12.

Transmode Consultants, Inc. Analysis of Freight Movements in the Puget Sound Region. Puget Sound Regional Council, Seattle, Wash., 1994.

13.

American Trucking Associations Foundation, Inc. Preferred Truck Routes: Routes Most Often Used in the Region for the Transportation of Freight. Rumford, R.I., 1997.

14.

American Trucking Associations Foundation, Inc. Motor Carrier and Freight Movement Operational Characteristics in the Baltimore Region. Rumford, R.I., 1997.

15.

Capital District Transportation Committee. Goods Movement in the Capital District: A Performance Report. Albany, N.Y., 1995.

16.

Katz, Okitsu & Associates. I-880 Corridor Truck Access Study, Task 2C Report: Results of Questionnaires. Metropolitan Transportation Commission, Oakland, Calif., 1999.

17.

Lau

S. W.

Truck Travel Surveys: A Review of the Literature and State of the Art. Metropolitan Transportation Commission, Oakland, Calif., 1995.

18.

Moritz

, and Brog

Redesign of the Dutch Travel Survey: Response Improvement. Presented at Transportation Research Board Conference on Personal Travel: The Long and Short of It. Washington, D.C., 1999.

19.

Dillman

Mail and Telephone Surveys: The Total Design Method. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1978.

20.

Souleyrette

R. R.

, Plazak

D. J.

, Strauss

T. R.

, and Andrle

S. J.

Applications of State Employment Data to Transportation Planning. Presented at 80th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2001.