Evaluation of Road Surface Profiler and Transverse Profilograph for Determination of Rut Depths

Abstract

In recent years, the road surface profiler (RSP), also known as the high-speed profiler, has been used as the standard equipment for measurement of rut depths. Typically, for highway pavements an RSP with a three-sensor configuration is used to measure rut depth. Rut-depth measurements were taken with an RSP with three sensors at a spacing of 0.87 m and with a transverse profilograph (TP) on six projects, each of which was approximately 8 km (5 mi) long. At any given location the rut depth taken with the RSP was, on average, three times less than that taken with the TP. Different values of rut depth were determined by simulating the lateral movement of the vehicle, effectively, vehicle wander. Comparison of the rut-depth measurements obtained with the actual RSP and those obtained with the simulated RSP showed that the RSP vehicle had wandered from the center in almost all cases and that the wander in some cases was up to 0.57 m. The distance between the maximum rut depths within each wheel-path varied from 1.55 to 2.19 m, with an average of 1.86 m. The measured rut depth increased by as much as 300 percent when the sensor spacing was varied from 0.75 to 1.20 m. Measurement of the transverse profile was determined to be the most accurate method of rut-depth measurement. It will be possible to accomplish this either with additional sensors required to capture the transverse profile in the RSP or with a TP.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Asnani

, Ksaibati

, and Al-Suleiman

T. I.

Consistency of Roughness and Rut Depth Measurement Collected with 11 South Dakota Road Profilers. In Transportation Research Record 1410, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1993, pp. 41–51.

Gramling

W. L.

, Hunt

J. E.

, Muraoka

, and Suzuki

G. S.

Obtaining Rut Depth Information for Strategic Highway Research Program Long-Term Pavement Performance Sites. In Transportation Research Record 1410, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1993, pp. 19–24.

Bertrand

, Hudson

W. R.

, and Lu

Procedure to Develop Index Quantifying Transverse Profile and Rutting of Flexible Pavements. In Transportation Research Record 1344, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1992, pp. 130–138.

DuBose

J. B.

Comparison of the South Dakota Road Profiler with Other Rut Measurement Methods. In Transportation Research Record 1311, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1991, pp. 1–6.

Gramling

W. L.

, Hunt

J. E.

, and Suzuki

G. S.

Rational Approach to Cross-Profile and Rut Depth Analysis. In Transportation Research Record 1311, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1991, pp. 173–179.

Simpson

A. L.

, Characterization of Transverse Profile. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1655, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1999, pp. 185–191.

Karamihas

S. M.

, Gillespie

T. D.

, Kohn

S. D.

, and Perera

R. W.

NCHRP Report 434: Guidelines for Longitudinal Pavement Profile Measurement. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1999.

McNamara

R. L.

, and Miley

W. G.

Evaluation of the Laser Road Surface Tester for Use as a Production Condition Survey System in Florida. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1988.

McNamara

R. L.

, and Miley

W. G.

Ultrasonic Rutbar Evaluation, International Cybernetics Corporation, Inc. State Materials Office, Florida Department of Transportation, Tallahassee, 1992.