A simulation model of a hypothetical highway corridor was used to analyze the effects of converting an existing high-occupancy vehicle (HOV) lane to either a high-occupancy toll (HOT) lane or a mixedflow lane. The simulation model, which uses a nested logit structure with a synthetic sample of individuals, estimates vehicle miles of travel (VMT), vehicle hours of travel, and person hours of travel in the corridor. The analysis suggests that mobility needs can best be served by using excess HOV lane capacity as an HOT lane facility. Capacity expansion alternatives are also analyzed, including adding mixed-flow travel lanes or converting existing lanes to HOV or HOT lanes. Alternative toll levels are also simulated. Results show that managing capacity as an HOT or HOV lane could provide superior mobility benefits with a net decrease in VMT if capacity must be expanded.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
National Transportation Statistics. U.S. Department of Transportation, 1997.
2.
A New Urban Vision: Making Better Communities by Linking Land Use and Transportation. Association of Bay Area Governments, Oakland, Calif., 1999.
3.
DahlgrenJ. W.An Analysis of the Effectiveness of High Occupancy Vehicle Lanes. Institute of Transportation Studies, Berkeley, Calif., 1994.
4.
BMIet al.I-95/I-395 HOV Restriction Study. Volume 1: Summary Report. Virginia Department of Transportation, Richmond, Va., 1999.
5.
KainJ., GittellR., DaniereA., DanielS., SomervilleT., and ZhiL.Increasing the Productivity of the Nation’s Urban Transportation Infrastructure. Federal Transit Administration, DOT-T-92-17, 1992.
6.
ParkanyE.Can High Occupancy/Toll Lanes Encourage Carpooling? Case Study of Carpooling Behavior on the 91 Express Lanes. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1682, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1999, pp. 46–54.
7.
FieldingG., and KleinD. B.High Occupancy Toll Lanes: Phasing in Congestion Pricing a Lane at a Time. Policy Study No. 170. Reason Foundation, Los Angeles, Calif., 1993.
8.
New Jersey Department of Transportation. I-80, I-287 HOV Lanes Opened to All Traffic. News Release, Office of the Governor, Trenton, 1998.
9.
KocieniewskiD.Whitman Says She Will End Car Pool Lanes. New York Times, New York, Oct.23, 1998.
10.
MostD.Car Pool Lanes Could Be History. Northern New Jersey Record, Oct.9, 1998.
11.
SullivanE.Evaluating the Impacts of the SR 91 Variable-Toll Express Lane Facility Final Report. U.S. Department of Transportation and Caltrans, Sacramento, Calif., 1998.
12.
FuhsC., HarakeJ. E., and StocktonB.Tolling HOV Lanes: A Nationwide Perspective on Prospects and Experience. Presented at 67th Annual Meeting of the Institute of Transportation Engineers, Boston, Mass., 1997.
13.
ChuX.Trip Scheduling and Economic Analysis of Transportation Policies. Ph.D. dissertation. University of California, Irvine, 1993.
14.
RossiT. F., and OutwaterM. L.How Valid Is It to Transfer Mode Choice Model Parameters?Presented at Transportation Research Board Transportation Planning Methods Workshop, Boston, Mass., 1999.
15.
SmallK. A.The Scheduling of Consumer Activities: Work Trips. American Economic Review, Vol. 72, No. 3, 1982, pp. 467–479.
16.
ChuX., and FieldingG.Electronic Road Pricing in Southern California: Policy Obstacles to Congestion Pricing. Proc., International Conference on Advanced Technologies in Transportation and Traffic Management. Singapore, 1994.
17.
NolandR. B.Simulated Relationships Between Highway Capacity, Transit Ridership, and Service Frequency. Journal of Public Transportation, Vol. 3, No. 1, 2000, pp. 1–27.
18.
Ben-AkivaM., and LermanS. R.Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1985.
Final Report Sonoma County US 101 Variable Pricing Study. Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade and Douglas, Inc., San Francisco, Calif., 1999.
21.
Traffic Assignment Manual. U.S. Bureau of Public Roads, Washington, D.C., 1964.
22.
LiJ.Explaining High-Occupancy Toll Lane Use. Transportation Research D, Vol. 6, 2001, pp. 61–74.
23.
DahlgrenJ.High Occupancy Vehicle Lanes: Not Always More Effective than General Purpose Lanes. Transportation Research A, Vol. 32, No. 2, 1998, pp. 99–114.
24.
NolandR. B.Relationships Between Highway Capacity and Induced Vehicle Travel, Transportation Research A, Vol. 35, No. 1, 2001, pp. 47–72.
