Pricing Commuter,Intercity,and Freight Trains in a Terminal Railway Context: An Approach

Abstract

The cost-of-service (or fully allocated cost) pricing model has been criticized in the economics literature. The criticisms generally focus on the issues of cross-subsidization problems from using average costs and economically inefficient pricing. A fully allocated cost model, applied to a terminal railroad setting, is presented that can substantively overcome these criticisms by using a resource consumption approach for key cost drivers. A successful implementation of a new cost recovery system in Toronto, Ontario, Canada, is used that applies these resource consumption concepts. A necessary precondition to this approach is the charting of the classes of traffic (commuter, intercity, and freight) into operated-track segmented paths, each of which consists of a set of one or more track links. Each traffic class path is characterized as either consisting of sole-use links, joint-use links, or a combination thereof. Operating and capital costs directly attributable to the track links are calculated. A reverse engineering work-effort-per-activity approach is used for assigning the total routine maintenance of way and maintenance of signals budget dollars to the terminal track links. The resource consumption approach provides a logical framework and analytical platform for analyzing link infrastructure complexity; system, path, and link capacity; path and link cost performance; and path and link renewal and replacement capital planning and capital sharing responsibility.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bertie

, Francey

, and Sward

. Rail User Pricing Guide Pertaining to GO Transit’s Toronto Terminal Rail Corridor: A Discussion Paper. GO Transit, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, March 2000.

de Neufville

Airport Privatization: Issues for the United States. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1662, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1999, pp. 24–31.

Waters

W. G.

II Optimal Pricing Under Joint and Common Costs. Working Paper No. 17. Transport Studies, University of Oxford, Oxford, England, 1976.

Góméz-Ibáñez

, Tye

W. B.

, and Winston

, eds. Essays in Transportation Economics and Policy: A Handbook in Honor of John R. Meyer. Brookings Institution, Washington, D.C., 1999, pp. 60–61, 63, 108–109.

Boyer

K. D.

Principles of Transportation Economics. Addison Wesley Longman, Inc., New York, 1999, pp. 248–249, 271–277.

Zarembski

A. M.

Factors Involved in Turnout Maintenance. Railway Track & Structures, March 1997.

NCHRP Report 399: Multimodal Corridor and Capacity Analysis Manual. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1998, pp. 12–13.

Davis

D. D.

, and Lopresti

. Comparisons of Two Turnout Designs in Revenue Service. Railway Track & Structures, July 1997.

Resor

R. R.

, and Patel

P. K.

. Allocating Track Maintenance Cost on Shared Rail Facilities. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1785, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2002, pp. 25–32.

10.

Mohring

, ed. The Economics of Transport, Vol. 1. Edward Algar Publishing Limited, Hants, England, 1997, p. xviii.

11.

Holloway

Straight and Level: Practical Airline Economics. Ashgate Publishing Limited, Hants, England, 1997, pp. 21–22.

12.

Morlok

E. K.

, and Riddle

S. P.

. Estimating the Capacity of Freight Transportation Systems: A Model and Its Application in Transportation Planning and Logistics. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1653, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1999, pp. 1–8.

13.

Special Report 255: Entry and Competition in the U.S. Airline Industry: Issues and Opportunities. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1999.