Automatic Passenger Counter Evaluation: Implications for National Transit Database Reporting

Abstract

Findings from a study assessing the accuracy and precision of automatic passenger counter (APC) technology at Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District of Oregon (Tri-Met) are presented. Video surveillance cameras, rather than ride checkers, were used to establish reference values for determining APC accuracy and precision. Analysis of data collection, processing, and reporting methods at Tri-Met indicates that APC data, along with a properly designed sampling plan, can be used for internal monthly ridership reporting and annual national transit database (NTD) reporting. Presently, NTD sampling plans require that bus trips be randomly selected before manual data collection efforts. The sampling methodology developed for this analysis allows APC data to be matched with a random selection of bus trips following automated data collection. This was made possible by the widespread deployment of APC technology at Tri-Met. For transit properties with limited APC resources, other sampling approaches are preferred.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Attanucci

, and Vozzolo

Assessment of Operational Effectiveness, Accuracy, and Costs of Automatic Passenger Counters. Transportation Research Record 947, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1983. pp. 15–23.

Hodges

C. C.

Automatic Passenger Counter Systems: The State of the Practice. Report No. DOT-1-87-36. Urban Mass Transportation Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, June 1985.

Boyle

D. K.

TCRP Synthesis of Transit Practice 29: Passenger Counting Technologies and Procedures. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1998.

Casey

R. F.

, Labell

L. N.

, Holmstrom

, LoVecchio

J. A.

, Schweiger

C. L.

, and Sheehan

Advanced Public Transportation Systems: The State of the Art Update ‘96. Report No. FTA-MA-26-7007-96-1. Federal Transit Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1996.

Multisystems, Inc. An Assessment of Automatic Passenger Counters. Report DOT-I-82-43. Urban Mass Transportation Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1982.

Strathman

J. G.

, and Hopper

J. R.

Evaluation of Automatic Passenger Counters: Validation, Sampling, and Statistical Inference. Transportation Research Record 1308, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1991. pp. 69–77.

Greneker

E. III

, Johnson

, Murphy

, and Rausch

E. O.

Improved Passenger Counter and Classifier System for Transit Operations. Transit-IDEA Program Project Final Report. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., Sept. 1996.

Hobbs

V. J.

, and Poirier

P. J.

Automated Passenger Counting Systems: A Synopsis of Working Group Meeting. Report DOT-TSC-UMTA-83-23. Urban Mass Transportation Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, May 1983.

Strathman

J. G.

, Kimpel

T. J.

, Dueker

K. J.

, Gerhart

R. L.

, Turner

, Griffin

, and Callas

Bus Transit Operations Control: Review and an Experiment Involving Tri-Met’s Automated Bus Dispatching System. Journal of Public Transportation, Vol. 4, No. 1, 2001, pp. 1–26.

10.

National Institute of Standards and Technology. Handbook 44: Specifications, Tolerances, and Other Technical Requirements for Weighing and Measuring Devices. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 1988.

11.

Wonnacott

R. J.

, and Wonnacott

T. H.

Econometrics. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, 1970.

12.

Sampling Procedures for Obtaining Fixed-Route Bus Operating Data Required Under the Section 15 Reporting System. Circular C 2710.1A. Urban Mass Transit Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, July 1988.