Several microscopic traffic flow models were tested with a publicly available data set. The task was to predict the travel times between several observers along a one-lane rural road, given as boundary conditions the flow into this road and the flow out of it. By using nonlinear optimization, the best matching set of parameters for each of the models was estimated. For this particular data set, the models that performed best were the ones with the smallest number of parameters. The average error rate of the best models is about 16%; however, this value is not very reliable: the error rate fluctuates between 2.5% and 25% for different parts of the data set.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ChowdhuryD., SantenL., and SchadschneiderA.. Statistical Physics of Vehicular Traffic and Some Related Systems. Physics Reports, Vol. 329, 2000, p. 199. (See also www.arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0070053.)
2.
HelbingD.Traffic and Related Self-Driven Many-Particle Systems. Reviews of Modern Physics, Vol. 73, No. 4, 2001, pp. 1067–1141. (See also www.arxiv.org/abs/condmat/0012229.)
SkabardonisA.Assessment of Traffic Simulation Models. Washington Department of Transportation, Olympia, 1999.
5.
Clearingstelle für Verkehrsdaten und Verkehrsmodelle (Clearinghouse for Data and Models; (currently in German only). German Aerospace Centre, Berlin. www.clearingstelle-verkehr.de.
6.
PressW. H., TeukolskyS. A., VetterlingW. T., and FlanneryB. P.. Numerical Recipes in C(Chapter 10 and references therein). Cambridge University Press, 2002.
7.
PowellM. J. D.UOBYQA: Unconstrained Optimization by Quadratic Approximation. Report 2000/14. Cambridge Numerical Analysis Group, Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, Cambridge University, United Kingdom, 2000. www.damtp.cam.ac.uk/user/na/reports.html.
8.
PowellM. J. D.A Direct Search Optimization Method That Models the Objective and Constraint Functions by Linear Interpolation. In Advances in Optimization and Numerical Analysis (GomezS. and HennartJ.-P., eds.), Kluwer Academic, 1994.
9.
IngberL.Simulated Annealing: Practice Versus Theory. Journal of Mathematical Computer Modelling, Vol. 18, 1993, pp. 29–57.
10.
NagelK., and SchreckenbergM.. Journal de Physique I, Vol. 2, 1992, p. 2221.
11.
DaganzoC. F.The Cell Transmission Model: A Simple Dynamical Representation of Highway Traffic. Transportation Research, Vol. 28B, 1994, pp. 269–287.
12.
FritzscheH. T.A Model for Traffic Simulation. Transportation Engineering Control, Vol. 5, 1994, pp. 317–321.
13.
GippsP. G.A Behavioral Car Following Model for Computer Simulation. Transportation Research, Vol. 15B, 1981, pp. 105–111.
14.
KraussS., WagnerP., and GawronC.. Metastable States in a Microscopic Model of Traffic Flow. Physical Review, Vol. 55E, 1997, pp. 5597–5605.
15.
TreiberM., HenneckeA., and HelbingD.. Congested Traffic States in Empirical Observation and Numerical Simulations. Physical Review, Vol. 62E, 2000, pp. 1805–1824.
16.
NewellG. F.Theories of Instabilities in Dense Highway Traffic. Journal of the Operations Research Society Japan, Vol. 5, 1962.
17.
BandoM., HasebeK., NakayamaA., ShibataA., and SugiyamaY.. Dynamical Model of Traffic Congestion and Numerical Simulation. Physical Review, Vol. 51E, 1999, pp. 239–253.
18.
AhmedK.I.Modeling Drivers’ Acceleration and Lane-Changing Behavior. Ph.D. thesis. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1999.
19.
GazisD. C., HermanR., and MontrollE. W.. Non-Linear Follow-the-Leader Models of Traffic Flow. Operations Research, Vol. 9, 1961, pp. 545–560.
20.
CrowtherB. C.A Comparison of CORSIM and INTEGRATION for the Modeling of Stationary Bottlenecks. Master’s thesis. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Va., 2001.
21.
KnospeW., SantenL., SchadschneiderA., and SchreckenbergM.. Towards a Realistic Microscopic Description of Highway Traffic. Journal de Physique, Vol. 33A, 2000, p. L477.
22.
KernerB. S., KlenovS. L., and WolfD. E.. Cellular Automata Approach to the Three Phase Theory of Traffic Flow. www.arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0206370.
23.
NewellG. F.A Simplified Car-Following Theory: A Lower Order Model. Transportation Research, Vol. 36B, 2002, pp. 195–205.
SmilowitzK. R., and DaganzoC. F.. Experimental Verification of Time-Dependent Accumulation Predictions in Congested Traffic. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1710, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2000, pp. 85–95.
26.
WilsonR. E.An Analysis of Gipps’ Model of Highway Traffic. IMA Journal of Applied Mathematics, Institute of Mathematics and Its Applications, Vol. 66, 2001, pp. 509–537.
