Analysis of the Effects of Speed Limit Enforcement Cameras: Differentiation by Road Type and Catchment Area

Abstract

A detailed statistical analysis is presented of the effects of speed limit enforcement cameras on injury accident numbers. The approach used is constructed in such a way that it is possible to differentiate not only between the effects of the cameras and the effects of trend and seasonality but actually to produce estimates that are independent of any other overall time-dependent effects. Crucially, the estimates produced are also net of the effects of regression to the mean. To allow for the simultaneous treatment of the different levels of severity, weights are used that reflect the frequency of the different types of accidents. This approach is then used on a data set for all injury accidents in Cambridgeshire between 1990 and 2002, which also contains data from 49 camera sites. To quantify the range of effectiveness of the cameras, estimates of the changes in accident numbers are produced for different distances from the camera site. The analysis shows that, overall, in the immediate vicinity of the camera sites, the installation of a camera can be expected to lead to decreases in weighted injury accident numbers by an astounding 45.74%. Lower, but still significant, decreases are observed in the wider surrounding area. Finally, to provide further insight into the differences in performance on different road types, the sites are grouped together according to road category. This analysis shows that the biggest reduction in accident numbers can be obtained on roads with a higher incidence of speeding offenses.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bowie

, and Walz

. Data Analysis of the Speed-Related Crash Issue. Auto and Traffic Safety, Vol. 1, No. 2, 1994, pp. 31–38.

Hobbs

C. A.

, and Mills

P. J.

. Injury Probability for Car Occupants in Frontal and Side Impacts. TRL Report 1124. Transport Research Laboratory, Crowthorne, United Kingdom, 1984.

Taylor

, Lynam

, and Baruya

. The Effect of Drivers' Speed on the Frequency of Road Accidents. TRL Report 421. Transport Research Laboratory, Crowthorne, United Kingdom, 2000.

Finch

D. J.

, Kompfner

, Lockwood

C. R.

, and Maycock

. Speed, Speed Limits and Accidents. TRL Report 58. Transport Research Laboratory, Crowthorne, United Kingdom, 1994.

Special Report 254: Managing Speed. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1998.

Retting

R. A.

, and Farmer

C. M.

. Evaluation of Speed Camera Enforcement in the District of Columbia. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1830, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2003, pp. 34–37.

Anderson

, and Edgar

A. W.

. Mobile Speed Cameras in the ACT—Slashing Speeds and Cutting Crashes. Presented at the Road Safety Research, Policing and Education Conference, Melbourne, Australia, 2001.

NASCOP: An Evaluation of the Photo-Radar Speed Enforcement Program. City of San Jose, San Jose, Calif., 2001.

Hess

, and Polak

. Effects of Speed Limit Enforcement Cameras on Accident Rates. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1830, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2003, pp. 25–33.

10.

PA Consulting. Cost Recovery System for Traffic Safety Cameras—First Year Report. Road Safety Division, Department of Transport, Local Government and the Regions, London, 2001.

11.

PA Consulting. A Cost Recovery System for Speed and Red-Light Cameras—Two Year Pilot Evaluation. Department for Transport, London, 2003.

12.

Hooke

, Knox

, and Portas

. Cost Benefit Analysis of Traffic Light and Speed Cameras. Police Research Series Paper 20. Home Office Police Research Group, London, 1996.

13.

Bourne

, and Cooke

. Victoria's Speed Camera Program. In Crime Prevention Studies, Vol. 1 ( Clarke

R. V.

, ed.), Criminal Justice Press, New York, 1993.

14.

Cameron

, Cavallo

, and Gilbert

. Evaluation of the Speed Camera Program in Victoria, 1990-1991. Report 42, Monash University Accident Research Centre, Victoria, Australia, 1992.

15.

Deacon

J. A.

, Zegeer

C. V.

, and Deen

R. C.

. Identification of Hazardous Rural Highway Locations. In Transportation Research Record 543, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1975, pp. 16–33.

16.

Gharaybeh

R. A.

Identification of Accident-Prone Locations in Greater Amman. In Transportation Research Record 1318, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1991, pp. 70–74.

17.

Quddus

M. A.

A Technique to Rank Hazardous Intersections. Presented at the 6th International Conference on Application of Advanced Technologies in Transportation Engineering, Singapore, 2000.

18.

Hess

A Statistical Analysis of the Effects of Safety Cameras on Traffic Accident Rates in Cambridgeshire. M. phil. thesis, Statistical Laboratory, Cambridge University, Cambridge, United Kingdom, 2002.

19.

West London Speed Camera Demonstration Project, July 1997. London Accident Analysis Unit, Highways Agency, London, 1997.