Prefabricated vertical drains (PVDs) are often used to improve soils by speeding up the rate of consolidation, and they are increasingly used for remediation of contaminated soils. When PVDs are installed in the ground, there is always a zone of disturbed soil surrounding them. The extent and the impact of this "smear" zone are difficult to quantify, and this uncertainty complicates the use of laboratory values in design. Consequently, obtaining in situ values for the hydraulic conductivity and horizontal coefficient of consolidation that include the effects of smear would be of great use to engineers who use PVDs in design. A method that utilizes PVDs to obtain in situ measurements of these parameters is described. The primary advantages of this method are its cost-effectiveness and the inclusion of smear in the results. A trial test was conducted on San Francisco Bay, California, mud. Some problems encountered during the initial phase of testing are described, and possible solutions are discussed. This promising method yields values that are logical and that compare well with published values for San Francisco Bay mud.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
CollazosO. M., BowdersJ. J., and BouazzaM.. Soil Vapor Extraction Enhanced with PV Drains. Missouri Waste Control Coalition Conference, 2001 A Waste Odyssey, July7-9, The Missouri Waste Control Coalition, Columbia, 2001, pp. 82–88.
2.
WelkerA. L., and GilbertR. B.. An Experiment to Assess a PVD Remediation System. Waste Management, Vol. 22, No. 7, 2002, pp. 791–801.
3.
GabrM. A., SabodishM., WilliamsonA., and BowdersJ. J.. BTEX Extraction from Clay Soil Using Prefabricated Vertical Drains (PVDs). Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Vol. 125, No. 7, 1999, pp. 615–618.
4.
ChaiJ.-C., and MiuraN.. Investigation of Factors Affecting Vertical Drain Behavior. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Vol. 125, No. 3, 1999, pp. 216–226.
5.
BarronR. A.Consolidation of Fine-Grained Soils by Drain Wells. Transactions of ASCE, Vol. 113, 1947, pp. 718–742.
6.
BergadoD. T., AsakamiH., AlfaroM. C., and BalasubramaniamA. S.. Smear Effects of Vertical Drains on Soft Bangkok Clay. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, Vol. 117, No. 10, 1991, pp. 1,509-1,529.
7.
HansboS.Design Aspects of Vertical Drains and Lime Column Installations. Proc., 9th Southeast Asian Geotechnical Conference, Dec.7-11, 1987, Southeast Asian Geotechnical Society, Bangkok, Thailand, 1987, pp. 8-1-8–12.
8.
SharmaJ., and XiaoD.. Determination of Smear Zone Around Vertical Drains. Soft Ground Technology. Geotechnical Special Publication 112, American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, Va., 2001, pp. 270–279.
9.
GuidoV. A., and LudewigN. M.. A Comparative Laboratory Evaluation of Band-Shaped Prefabricated Drains. In Consolidation of Soils: Testing and Evaluation, ASTM STP-892 (YoungR. N. and TownsendF. C., eds.), ASTM, Conshohocken, Pa., 1986, pp. 642–662.
10.
IndraratnaB., and RedanaI. W.. Plane-Strain Modeling of Smear Effects Associated with Vertical Drains. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Vol. 123, No. 5, 1997, pp. 474–478.
11.
HansboS.Consolidation of Fine-Grained Soils by Prefabricated Vertical Drains. Proc., 10th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundations Engineering, Stockholm, Sweden, June15-19, 1981, A. A. Balkema, Rotterdam, Netherlands, 1981, pp. 677–682.
12.
IndraratnaB., and RedanaI. W.. Laboratory Determination of Smear Zone Due to Vertical Drain Installation. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Vol. 124, No. 2, 1998, pp. 180–184.
13.
QuarantaJ. D., GabrM. A., CookE. E., and SzaboD.. Developments in Prefabricated Vertical-Drain-Enhanced Soil Flushing. Proc., 7th International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, Honolulu, Hawaii, May25-30, 1997, International Society of Offshore and Polar Engineers, Golden, Colo., 1997, pp. 703–706.
14.
HansboS.Consolidation of Clay by Band-Shaped Vertical Drains. Ground Engineering, Vol. 12, No. 5, 1979, pp. 16-18, 21–25.
15.
LongR., and CovoA.. Equivalent Diameter of Vertical Drains with an Oblong Cross Section. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, Vol. 120, No. 9, 1994, pp. 1,625-1,630.
16.
AtkinsonM. S., and EldredP. J. L.. Consolidation of Soil Using Vertical Drains. Geotechnique, Vol. 31, No. 1, 1981, pp. 33–43.
17.
FelleniusB. H., and CastonguayN. G.. The Efficiency of Band Shaped Drains—A Full-Scale Laboratory Study. Report to National Research Council and the Industrial Research Assistance Programme, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, 1985.
18.
WelkerA. L., and HerdinK. M.. Evaluation of Four Equivalent Diameter Formulations for Prefabricated Vertical Drains Using Flow Rates. Geosynthetics International, Vol. 10, No. 3, 2003.
19.
HvorslevM. J.Time Lag and Soil Permeability in Ground Water Observations. Bulletin No. 36. Waterways Experiment Station, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Vicksburg, Miss., 1951.
20.
BouwerH., and RiceR. C.. A Slug Test for Determining Hydraulic Conductivity of Unconfined Aquifers with Completely or Partially Penetrating Wells. Water Resources Research, Vol. 12, No. 3, 1976, pp. 423–428.
21.
MarchallP., and BarczewskiB.. The Analysis of Slug Tests in the Frequency Domain. Water Resources Research, Vol. 25, No. 11, 1989, pp. 2,388–2,396.
22.
AvciC. B., GulerE., and KilancB.. Variable Head Test Analysis for Partially Penetrating Wells. In Proceedings of Geoenvironment 2000 (AcarY. and DanielD., eds.), American Society of Civil Engineers, New York, 1995, pp. 213–217.
23.
KoutsoftasD. C.Post-Preload Settlements of a Soft Bay Mud Site. In Soil Behavior and Soft Ground Construction (GermaineJ. T., SheahanT. C. and WhitmanR. V., eds.), Geotechnical Special Publication 119. American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, Va., 2002, pp. 291–324.
24.
MieussensC., and DucasseP.. Measure en Place des Coefficients de Permeability et des Coefficients de Consolidation Horizontaux et Verticaux [in French]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, Vol. 14, No. 1, 1977, pp. 76–90.
25.
FoxP. J., DiNicolaM., and QuigleyD. W.. Piecewise-Linear Model for Large Strain Radial Consolidation. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Vol. 129, No. 10, 2003, pp. 940–950.
26.
TavernasF., DieneM., and LeroueilS.. Analysis of the in Situ Constant Head Permeability Tests in Clay. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, Vol. 27, 1990, pp. 305–314.
27.
WilkinsonW. B.Constant Head in Situ Permeability Tests in Clay Strata. Geotechnique, Vol. 18, 1968, pp. 172–194.
28.
KammererA. M., HuntC., and RiemerM.. UC Berkeley Geotechnical Testing for the East Bay Crossing of the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge. Geotechnical Engineering Research Report UCB/GT/99-18. University of California, Berkeley, 1999.
