Survey of Current High-Speed Rail Planning Efforts in the United States

Abstract

Characteristics of the corridors being considered by state and regional agencies for high-speed rail service (HSR) in the United States were surveyed. Through use of a data set of 21 systems at various stages of development, the study shows that initiatives under way involve 64 corridors, tracks of 21 freight railroads, and 15,552 unique mi of route. Findings show that these corridors reach 163 of the 250 largest metropolitan areas in the continental United States. More than 87% of the existing railroad mileage identified for high-speed service is operated by freight-oriented railroads, with 74% being single track. The choice of technology and the need to acquire nonrailroad land to support the development of corridors differ sharply between interstate and intrastate routes. These and other findings illustrate the many opportunities—and challenges—facing proponents of HSR throughout the country.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

High-Speed Ground Transportation for America. FRA, U.S. Department of Transportation, Sept. 1997.

Perl

New Departures: Rethinking Rail Passenger Policy in the Twenty-First Century. University Press of Kentucky, Lexington, 2002.

Levinson

Kanafani

and Gillen

. A Comparison of the Social Costs of Air and Highway. Transport Reviews, Vol. 18, No. 3 1998, pp. 215–240.

Levinson

Kanafani

and Gillen

. Air, High-Speed Rail, or Highway: A Cost Comparison in the California Corridor. Transportation Quarterly, Vol. 53, No. 1 1999, pp. 123–132.

Surface Infrastructure: High-Speed Rail Projects in the United States. Report to the Chairman. U.S. General Accounting Office, Jan. 1999.

de Cerreño

and Evans

D. M.

. High-Speed Rail Projects in the United States: Identifying the Elements for Success. Mineta Transportation Institute, San Jose, Calif., 2005.

Nash

Best Practices in Shared-Use High-Speed Rail Systems. Mineta Transportation Institute, San Jose, Calif., 2003.

Quandel

(ed.). Building a New Industry: High Speed Trains for America. High Speed Ground Transportation Association, Washington, D.C., 2006.

Roth

D. L.

and Aggarwala

R. T.

. Whose Railroad Is This, Anyway? Opportunities and Challenges in Regionalizing the Northeast Corridor. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1785, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2002, pp. 1–9.

10.

Vickerman

High-Speed Rail in Europe: Experience and Issues for Future Growth. Annals of Regional Science, Vol. 31, 1997, pp. 21–38.

11.

Guirao

Menéndez

J. M.

and Rivas

. Bimodal Use of High-Speed Rail Lines. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1916, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2005, pp. 1–7.

12.

Hsu

C.-I.

and Chung

W.-M.

. A Model for Market Share Distribution Between High-Speed and Conventional Rail Services in a Transportation Corridor. Annals of Regional Science, Vol. 31, 1997, pp. 121–153.

13.

Hensher

A Practical Approach to Identifying the Market Potential for High-Speed Rail: A Case Study in the Sydney—Canberra Corridor. Transportation Research A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 31, No. 6 1997, pp. 431–446.

14.

de Rus

and Inglada

. Cost-Benefit Analysis of the High-Speed Train in Spain. Annals of Regional Science, Vol. 31, 1997, pp. 175–188.

15.

Kobayashi

and Okumura

. The Growth of City Systems with HighSpeed Railway Systems. Annals of Regional Science, Vol. 31, 1997, pp. 39–56.

16.

Martin

Justifying a High-Speed Rail Project: Social Value Versus Regional Growth. Annals of Regional Science, Vol. 31, 1997, pp. 155–174.