Probabilistic Model for Predicting Rail Breaks and Controlling Risk of Derailment

Abstract

A model is developed to analyze the risk of derailment of railway vehicles by using a probabilistic approach to model the development of rail defects leading to rail breaks and further to derailment. The risk of derailment is measured by the expected number of rail breaks multiplied by the severity of rail break. To evaluate the risk, four submodels are combined to predict the rate of occurrence of rail defects and breaks. These submodels include one to predict the expected number of weld defects, considering the effect of rail repair; a fatigue model of the rails; and a grinding model to take into account removal of defects through maintenance. The fourth submodel concerns the impact of inspections that are imperfect and of nonconstant frequency. The performance and application of the proposed combined model are illustrated by an example that shows the effectiveness of alternative measures in reducing the risk of derailment. It also shows that the proposed model can be used as a tool for quantitatively evaluating the risk of derailment and for decision making on control of the risk.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Wiseman

P. W.

A Numerate Criterion for Rail Replacement on Mainline BR Track. Report TM 047. British Rail Research, Derby, United Kingdom, 1990.

Barkan

C. P. L.

Dick

C. T.

and Anderson

. Railroad Derailment Factors Affecting Hazardous Materials Transportation Risk. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1825, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2003, pp. 64–74.

Dick

C. T.

Barkan

C. P. L.

Chapman

E. R.

and Stehly

M. P.

. Multivariate Statistical Model for Predicting Occurrence and Location of Broken Rails. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1825, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2003, pp. 48–55.

Anderson

R. T.

and Barkan

C. P. L.

. Railroad Accident Rates for Use in Transportation Risk Analysis. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1863, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2004, pp. 88–98.

Orringer

Rail Testing: Strategies for Safe and Economical Rail Quality Assurance. In Transportation Research Record 1174, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1988, pp. 28–42.

Zarembski

A. M.

and Palese

J. W.

. Risk-Based Ultrasonic Rail Test Scheduling: Practical Applications in Europe and North America. Proc., 6th International Conference on Contact Mechanics and Wear of Rail/Wheel Systems, Gothenburg, Sweden, 2003, pp. 357–368.

Podofillini

Zio

and Vatn

. Risk-Informed Optimisation of Railway Tracks Inspection and Maintenance Procedures. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2006, pp. 20–35.

Burstow

M. C.

Watson

A. S.

and Beagles

. Application of the Whole Life Rail Model to Control Rolling Contact Fatigue. Proc., International Conference on Maintenance and Renewal of Permanent Way and Structures (Railway Engineering-2002) (CD-ROM), London, Engineering Technics Press, Edinburgh, United Kingdom, 2002.

Berger

J. O.

Statistical Decision Theory: Foundations, Concepts, and Methods. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1980.

10.

Chiang

C. L.

Introduction to Stochastic Processes and Their Applications. R. E. Krieger Publishing Co., Huntington, N.Y., 1980.

11.

Manual for Railway Engineering. American Railway Engineering and Maintenance of Way Associations, Lanham, Md., 2002.

12.

Vatn

Podofillini

Z. E.

and Svee

. A Risk-Based Approach to Determine Type of Ultrasonic Inspection and Frequencies in Railway Applications. Proc., World Congress on Railway Research. Edinburgh, United Kingdom, 2003.

13.

Zhao

Chan

A. H. C.

Stirling

A. B.

and Madelin

K. B.

. Reliability Evaluation and Optimization for Non-Homogeneous Systems Under Imperfect Inspection. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Vol. 92, 2007, pp. 65–73.

14.

Parzen

Stochastic Processes. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia, Pa, 1999.

15.

Zarembski

A. M.

Forecasting of Track Component Lives and Its Use in Track Maintenance Planning. Proc., International Heavy Haul Workshop on Maintenance of Way and Train Operations, Balancing the Conflicts. Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, 1991, pp. 38–44.

16.

Jeong

D. Y.

Tang

Y. H.

and Orringer

. Damage Tolerance Analysis of Detail Fractures in Rail. Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, Vol. 28, 1997, pp. 109–115.

17.

Health and Safety Executive. Railway Safety Statistics Bulletin 2001/02. Press Release C20: 09/02, HSE Information Services, Caerphilly, United Kingdom, 2002.