Dedicated Truck Facilities as Solution to Capacity and Safety Issues on Rural Interstate Highway Corridors

Abstract

This paper identifies the safety and operational benefits of constructing dedicated truck facilities on a rural Interstate corridor. The Interstate highway segment in the case study is a 164-mi section of I-80 from the Iowa–Illinois border to Altoona, Iowa (an eastern suburb of Des Moines, Iowa). Although many studies have considered constructing an additional lane on freeways and designating it for trucks only, this paper considers the construction of a separate four-lane, limited-access facility for trucks. The I-80 corridor was analyzed with the Highway Economic Requirements Software–state edition (HERS-ST) to measure the performance before and after trucks were removed from the general purpose lanes. Several benefit-to-cost ratios were calculated outside of HERS-ST to determine the economic feasibility (but not the financial feasibility) of constructing dedicated truck lanes. Since there are no similar truck-only facilities in the United States, it is unknown what proportion of motor carriers would choose to use a truck-only facility rather than the mixed-traffic lanes (general purpose lanes), and future policy may or may not require trucks to use parallel truck-only facilities. Therefore, a sensitivity analysis was conducted within the benefit-to-cost analysis to determine the benefits of diverting 100%, 75%, 50%, and 25% of trucks to a dedicated truck facility. At all levels of diversion, the benefits exceed the costs. Although the analysis shows that a truck-only facility is desirable, the policy framework to make such a facility physically and financially feasible does not exist in federal or Iowa policy.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Maze

T. H.

Kroeger

and Berndt

. Trucks and Twin Cities Traffic Management. Prepared for the Minnesota Department of Transportation. Iowa State University Center for Transportation Research and Education, Ames, 2005.

Reich

S. L.

Davis

J. L.

Ferraro

A. J.

and Catala

. Exclusive Facilities for Trucks in Florida: An Investigation of the Potentials for Reserved Truck Lanes and Truckways on the State Highway System. Proc., Mid-Continent Transportation Research Symposium, Iowa State University, Ames, 2003.

Evaluation of the I-10 East Truck Restriction Demonstration Project. Texas Transportation Institute, Texas A&M University, College Station, 2001.

Managed Lanes: State of the Practice. Texas Transportation Institute, Texas A&M University, College Station, 2002.

Forkenbrock

D. J.

and March

. Issues in the Financing of Truck-Only Lanes. Public Roads, Vol. 69, No. 2, Sept.–Oct. 2005.

Poole

R. W.

Jr. and Samuel

. Corridors for Toll Truckways: Suggested Locations for Pilot Projects. Study Number 316. Reason Public Policy Institute, Los Angeles, Calif., 2004.

HERS-ST Highway Economic Requirements System–State Version: Pilot Program Report. FHWA-IF-02-056. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2002.

Overview of Highway Performance Monitoring System (HPMS) for FHWA Field Offices. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2006. www.fhwa.dot.gov/policy/ohpi/hpms/hpmsprimer.htm.

Maze

T. H.

Walter

C. K.

and Smadi

. Policy Issues of an Iowa Longer Combination Vehicle Network. Prepared for Midwest Transportation Center. Iowa State University, Ames, 1994. www.ctre.iastate.edu/reports/long_combo_vehicles.pdf.

10.

Kostyniuk

L. P.

Streff

F. M.

and Zakrajsek

. Identifying Unsafe Driver Actions that Lead to Fatal Car–Truck Crashes. Prepared for AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety. University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute, Ann Arbor, 2002.

11.

Maze

T. H.

Preston

Storm

R. J.

Hawkins

and Burchett

. Safety Performance of Divided Expressways. ITE Journal, Vol. 75, No. 5, May 2005, pp. 48–53.

12.

Grinstead

C. M.

and Snell

J. L.

. Central Limit Theorem. In Introduction to Probability, 2nd revised ed. American Mathematical Society, Providence, R.I., 1997, pp. 325–355.

13.

Manual on Classification of Motor Vehicle Traffic Accidents, 5th ed. ANSI D-16.1–1989. National Safety Council, Itasca, Ill., 1990.

14.

Highway Economic Requirements System State Version: Overview. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2002. isddc.dot.gov/OLPFiles/FHWA/010617.pdf.

15.

A Manual of User Benefit Analysis for Highways, 2nd ed. AASHTO, Washington, D.C., 2003.

16.

Flyvbjerg

Holm

M. S.

and Buhl

. Underestimating Costs in Public Works Projects: Error or Lie? Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol. 69, No. 3, Summer 2002, pp. 279–295.

17.

Jovanis

P. P.

Chang

H.-L.

and Zabaneh

. Comparison of Accident Rates for Two Truck Configurations. In Transportation Research Record 1249, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1989, pp. 18–29.

18.

Woodrooffe

Long Combination Vehicle (LCV) Safety Performance in Alberta 1995 to 1998. Woodrooffe and Associates. Alberta Infrastructure and Transportation, Transportation Policy and Economic Analysis Branch, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, 2001.