Development of Silt Fence Tieback Design Methodology for Highway Construction Installations

Abstract

This research effort focuses on improving sediment control practices used at highway construction projects by employing properly designed and correctly installed silt fence applications. Previous research indicated that tying silt fence installations back into the contour and creating a J-shaped hook (or a tieback) is an effective way to improve the efficiency of silt fence installations. Silt fences with tiebacks form a temporary detention basin, which helps facilitate sediment removal by sedimentation. The purpose of this research was to develop a rational numerical method for designing such silt fence tiebacks at highway construction sites. The proposed method employs a hydrological model to estimate the volume of runoff water generated by the watershed and balances the water with the storage capacity of the silt fence installed with a tieback. First, the Soil Conservation Service's method is used to estimate the amount of storm water generated during a design storm event. Then, with the cross-sectional data from a highway construction project, a graph is generated to estimate the storage volume available behind a silt fence for various ditch and highway slopes. Using these data, the designer can determine the proper placement frequencies of silt fence tiebacks along a linear highway construction project. This paper provides the mathematical details of this novel design procedure. An example problem is also provided to illustrate its practical applicability.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Storm Water Phase II Final Rule: Construction Site Runoff Control Minimum Control Measure. EPA 833/F-00/008. Office of Water, 2000.

Alabama State. Alabama Soil and Water Conservation Committee. Alabama Handbook for Erosion Control, Sediment Control, and Storm-water Management on Construction Site and Urban Areas: Vol. 1. Montgomery, Ala., 2003.

Roberts

B. C.

Developing Erosion Control Plans for Highway Construction. In Transportation Research Record 1471, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1994, pp. 38–40.

Fifield

J. S.

Designing for Effective Sediment and Erosion Control on Construction Sites. Forester Press, Santa Barbara, Calif., 2004.

Barrett

M. E.

Kearney

J. E.

McCoy

T. G.

and Malina

J. F.

. An Evaluation of the Use and Effectiveness of Temporary Sediment Controls. Center for Research in Water Resources Technical Report 95–6. The University of Texas at Austin, 1995.

Robichaud

P. R.

McCool

D. K.

Pannkuk

C. D.

Brown

R. E.

and Mutch

P. W.

. Trap Efficiency of Silt Fences Used in Hillslope Erosion Studies. American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, St. Joseph, Mich., 2001, pp. 541–543.

Stevens

Barfield

B. J.

Britton

S. L.

and Hayes

J. S.

. Filter Fence Design Aid for Sediment Control at Construction Sites. EPA 600/R-04/185. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, 2004.

Barrett

M. E.

Malina

J. F.

and Charbeneau

R. J.

. An Evaluation of Geotextiles for Temporary Sediment Control. Water Environment Research, Vol. 70, No. 3, May/June 1998, pp. 283–290.

Zech

W. C.

Halverson

J. L.

and Clement

T. P.

. Evaluating the Effectiveness of Various Types of Silt Fence Installations to Control Sediment Discharge from Highway Construction Sites. ASCE Journal of Hydrologic Engineering (forthcoming).

10.

Kentucky Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Field Guide. www.tetratech-ffx.com/wstraining/pdf/esc_guide.pdf. Accessed June 5, 2006.

11.

Tommy Silt Fence Machine. www.tommy-sfm.com. Accessed Nov. 17, 2005.

12.

Iowa Statewide Urban Design Standards Manual. www.iowasudas.org/documents/7E-28-06.pdf. Accessed July 19, 2007.

13.

Novotny

Water Quality: Diffuse Pollution and Watershed Management. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 2003.

14.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Reissuance of NPDES General Permits for Storm Water Discharges from Construction Activities. Federal Register, Part II, Notice, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 1998.

15.

U.S. Department of Commerce. Technical Paper No. 40: Rainfall Frequency Atlas of the United States for Durations from 30 Minutes to 24 Hours and Return Periods from 1 to 100 Years. Weather Bureau, Washington, D.C., 1961.